EPTWell there was no objection so it is relevant.. I'm just saying it's a simple question with a simple answer. he could of answered it ages ago and it would of been over much quicker instead of dancing around it.
Shooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 318
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23221 Posts
Well there was no objection so it is relevant.. I'm just saying it's a simple question with a simple answer. he could of answered it ages ago and it would of been over much quicker instead of dancing around it. | ||
|
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:02 GreenHorizons wrote: Well there was no objection so it is relevant.. I'm just saying it's a simple question with a simple answer. Instead of dancing around it. ... Whether the punch is EXACTLY to the T how it would have occurred is irrelevant imo. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23221 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:03 sc2superfan101 wrote: ... Whether the punch is EXACTLY to the T how it would have occurred is irrelevant imo. Perhaps to a murder 2 conviction but not to the admissibility of the animation | ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:00 GreenHorizons wrote: No it's not accurate. It's an estimate. Pretty simple Question and answer. Could of been a jab could of been a cross or hook. Don't think we even have evidence of which hand Trayvon punched with. It's an accurate simulation base on evidence submitted. If the evidence isn't accurate well that's another story. Also it doesn't matter what type of hit at all. | ||
|
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:04 NEOtheONE wrote: It's an accurate simulation base on evidence submitted. If the evidence isn't accurate well that's another story. Also it doesn't matter what type of hit at all. Exactly, and I don't see how the prosecutor asking us to assume that the evidence isn't accurate is really valid... he basically claimed that the testimony of the witnesses were all wild estimations without ever (afaik) asking the witnesses themselves: "Is this an estimation?" | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23221 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:04 NEOtheONE wrote: It's an accurate simulation base on evidence submitted. If the evidence isn't accurate well that's another story. Also it doesn't matter what type of hit at all. The prosecution is demonstrating that there are multiple estimations within the video and we all know the more estimations included in a calculation the less accurate it is. The prosecution is arguing that the amalgamation of all of the estimations results in an inaccurate portrayal. | ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:08 GreenHorizons wrote: The prosecution is demonstrating that there are multiple estimations within the video and we all know the more estimations included in a calculation the less accurate it is. The prosecution is arguing that the amalgamation of all of the estimations results in an inaccurate portrayal. Motion capture is obscenely precise, the only estimation going on is the witness testimony which is being used as "fact" for the purpose of the simulation. EDIT: also, John Good John Good. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:22 sc2superfan101 wrote: LOL this defense is so awesome. what happened!??!? | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
judge - john good, john good, john good. lol | ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:29 dAPhREAk wrote: judge - fuck y'all, im going to ask my own questions. judge - john good, john good, john good. lol Pretty much. Even the judge is jumping on the John Good bandwagon, lol. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23221 Posts
| ||
|
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
it's hard to explain. the whole prosecution was to try to say that you couldn't line up the John Good/Jenna Laure(sp?) timelines. thats absurd of course, and the defense tried using two parallel lines to barney style it. doesn't look like it worked though. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23221 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:35 Kaitlin wrote: She's gonna make them take out the Jenna Lauer 911 recording from the animation. Calling it now. Yeah sounds about right | ||
|
Craton
United States17250 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
video is dead i guess. | ||
| ||
