EPTSTOP "PROTECT IP (S. 968)/SOPA (HR. 3261)" - Page 17
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Elite__
Canada976 Posts
| ||
|
ExileR
United States89 Posts
| ||
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
On December 16 2011 01:47 psteeleneg wrote: http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/mark_12152011.html This stream doesn't go down. Open it with gom player if you have it. Thanks  | ||
|
teh_longinator
Canada725 Posts
On December 16 2011 01:59 aksfjh wrote: I'm confused how in the world this is meant to protect consumers. It's not. It's meant to protect the suppliers. | ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
+national security +not technologically equipped +the people who are voting dont know fuck about the internet for: +only blocking international site from the source +help the economy: jobs, money etc +the new version of the bill has improved... (what?) | ||
|
driftme
United States360 Posts
On December 16 2011 02:04 NB wrote: against: +national security +not technologically equipped +the people who are voting dont know fuck about the internet for: +only blocking international site from the source +help the economy: jobs, money etc +the new version of the bill has improved... (what?) the argument that piracy has killed thousands of jobs is totally baseless, as is the argument that this bill will harm jobs. i don't think it can be argued either way, but i do think that this bill could do more harm to jobs/economy than help | ||
|
driftme
United States360 Posts
| ||
|
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
| ||
|
ExileR
United States89 Posts
On December 16 2011 02:08 driftme wrote: the argument that piracy has killed thousands of jobs is totally baseless, as is the argument that this bill will harm jobs. i don't think it can be argued either way, but i do think that this bill could do more harm to jobs/economy than help Yeah, I agree with the whole jobs being harmed in the US from pirating.. but it's just a slight dent in the %. Even if this does get passed, many will still be jobless, even more so. People being paid for doing their job online will be forced to not be able to be creative/innovative with all the censorship all around the net. Everyone would end up being on their toes while online instead of free minded imo. | ||
|
driftme
United States360 Posts
On December 16 2011 02:13 aksfjh wrote: I'm surprised there hasn't been hearings from technical experts. This thing really is being rushed through. They've had more attempts of insight in Major League Baseball nonsense. Theres a reason for that, its because the people creating these hearings are in favor of the bill and they know with expert testimony it will be harder to pass. | ||
|
HeavenS
Colombia2259 Posts
| ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
On December 16 2011 02:13 aksfjh wrote: I'm surprised there hasn't been hearings from technical experts. This thing really is being rushed through. They've had more attempts of insight in Major League Baseball nonsense. to be fair if you look at it from a corporation point of view money and rushing is their only hope.... wait for the next 3-4 years until the next generation hold the power they simply wont be able to do a thing... anyone who was borned after 1985 would against internet censorship | ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
| ||
|
HeavenS
Colombia2259 Posts
thats us guys xD | ||
|
Phenny
Australia1435 Posts
| ||
|
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On December 16 2011 02:16 Xxio wrote: "Us non-nerd, non-technical people" "haste makes waste" | ||
|
ExileR
United States89 Posts
| ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
| ||
|
ExileR
United States89 Posts
That's one of the things that has made sense to me from him speaking thus far. =] | ||
| ||
