EPT
Republican nominations - Page 353
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Powerpill
United States1693 Posts
| ||
|
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
Doesn't warrant a follow-up. | ||
|
SoLaR[i.C]
United States2969 Posts
Santorum counters with push-button word "Jihadists" | ||
|
Saryph
United States1955 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
"By beating them." lol | ||
Falling
Canada11607 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:51 Saryph wrote: Santorum and Romney are suggesting increasing government spending by sending mountains of aid to democratize Cuba (a jihadist weapons platform???), and building fleets of new naval vessels. So much for fiscal conservatism. | ||
|
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
Guardian liveblog: Newt Gingrich actually thinks that if the Dodd-Frank financial regulation reforms, the economy will recover over-night: "If they were to repeal that tomorrow morning you would have a better housing market the next day." Also, unicorns would be seen on the grounds of the White House. | ||
|
BryanSC
United States455 Posts
| ||
|
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:54 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Ron Paul just made the most sense on that question but sounded the worst u_u He doesn't have the flair, or charisma of the others...but he makes sense and give smart answers. Sadly the American public likes their one liners.... | ||
|
gruff
Sweden2276 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:52 GGTeMpLaR wrote: How do you win a war in Afghanistan without talking to the taliban Romney? "By beating them." lol Technically that might work though it leads to the follow-up question, how?  | ||
|
GreenManalishi
Canada834 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:51 Saryph wrote: Santorum and Romney are suggesting increasing government spending by sending mountains of aid to democratize Cuba (a jihadist weapons platform???), and building fleets of new naval vessels. There are loads of Jihadists in Cuba. All of the ones in Guantanamo Bay. | ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:54 Derez wrote: I like Paul's answer on Cuba, but answers like this scare me. Wait, why? It made perfect sense to me...I don't think Iran actually wants to close the Straits and hurt their economy | ||
|
Saryph
United States1955 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:56 GreenManalishi wrote: There are loads of Jihadists in Cuba. All of the ones in Guantanamo Bay. I didn't know the prisoners there were assembling missile platforms to attack the United States though, really surprising that the guards would allow such a thing. | ||
|
GreenManalishi
Canada834 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:57 1Eris1 wrote: Wait, why? It made perfect sense to me...I don't think Iran actually wants to close the Straits and hurt their economy If you read the statement, it is pretty clear Iran wants the EU to keep buying their oil. Closing the straights was a threat to prevent the EU from leveling more sanctions against Iran. | ||
|
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
Ron Paul consistently makes the most sense on foreign policy, but because of the militant conservatives he'll never win based on that. | ||
|
Saryph
United States1955 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:58 Kimaker wrote: Sad fact of this debate, and the whole republican nomination process with the given candidates: Ron Paul consistently makes the most sense on foreign policy, but because of the militant conservatives he'll never win based on that. No, no he doesn't. None of them make that much sense, but if you put aside Iran, Paul probably makes the least amount of sense. | ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
On January 24 2012 11:58 GreenManalishi wrote: If you read the statement, it is pretty clear Iran wants the EU to keep buying their oil. Closing the straights was a threat to prevent the EU from leveling more sanctions against Iran. Of course they do? Are you saying they shouldn't stand up against the EU and just let themselves get sanctioned? | ||
|
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
Iran is a Shiite state, Al-Qaeda is Sunni filtered through Salafiyyah and Qutbism. Not even close ideologically.... | ||
| ||
