EDIT: Woot, started two pages in a row :D
Republican nominations - Page 337
Forum Index > General Forum |
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
EDIT: Woot, started two pages in a row :D | ||
Corvette
United States433 Posts
However he has won polls in other states such as texas and idaho. also I am sure that Paul will campaign the whole time because of something he said "Im not just campaigning for presidency, but also to spread my ideas" (Paraphrasing, cant find exact quote) | ||
SoLaR[i.C]
United States2969 Posts
Florida is the worst state in the US and I refuse to even acknowledge it. ![]() | ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
Oh here it is. The stream knows me well. Gingrich goes up in 5. | ||
Terry Bogard
36 Posts
On January 22 2012 10:35 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Here's % of the votes he got in the three states in 2008 Iowa: 10% New Hampshire: 8% South Carolina: 4% Here's those same three states in 2012 Iowa: 21% New Hampshire: 23% South Carolina: 13% (As of now) Still not sure it's growing? You are retarded and I'd be willing to make a significant financial bet with you that Paul won't win the nomination. That is how sure I am that he will not win. First of all, he came last in South Carolina. Secondly, the only reason he gets high percentages is when Democrats and Independents are allowed to vote. Thirdly, he tries explaining shit in the debates. AMURICANS don't like explanations - they like Patriotic/evangelical statements that don't require much thought. Paul would get more votes if he said: "I want to win back America for Jesus," than explaining the economic benefits of a zero percent tax rate. Thinking that Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination is like believing that the hot chick in your class is going to go out with you if only she could see what a special person you are when you're a fucking computer nerd. User was warned for this post | ||
BobTheBuilder1377
Somalia335 Posts
On January 22 2012 10:51 aksfjh wrote: That's the way it seems. Any long drawn out battle that goes to the last state will favor Romney, and then Paul. Paul went all the way to the convention 4 years ago as well. See, this is the kind of ignorance I'm talking about. Ron Paul did not attend the Republican Convention four years ago because they didn't let him in. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Republican_National_Convention | ||
acker
United States2958 Posts
| ||
Corvette
United States433 Posts
On January 22 2012 10:53 SoLaR[i.C] wrote: I think Ron has a good chance of winning Nevada. He could put up a good showing in Maine as well. Florida is the worst state in the US and I refuse to even acknowledge it. ![]() as someone who lives in florida, i whole heartedly agree with you. But I am still going to go watch the debates monday since they are coming to my school ^^ | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On January 22 2012 10:56 Terry Bogard wrote: You are retarded and I'd be willing to make a significant financial bet with you that Paul won't win the nomination. That is how sure I am that he will not win. First of all, he came last in South Carolina. Secondly, the only reason he gets high percentages is when Democrats and Independents are allowed to vote. Thirdly, he tries explaining shit in the debates. AMURICANS don't like explanations - they like Patriotic/evangelical statements that don't require much thought. Paul would get more votes if he said: "I want to win back America for Jesus," than explaining the economic benefits of a zero percent tax rate. Thinking that Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination is like believing that the hot chick in your class is going to go out with you if only she could see what a special person you are when you're a fucking computer nerd. You didn't read my post or the post it was directed at. Please read before you post with ironic accusations. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
forgottendreams
United States1771 Posts
On January 22 2012 10:58 acker wrote: Can anyone from South Carolina explain how Gingrich managed to win by such a large margin? IIRC South Carolina is extremely high in terms of religiosity for evangelical protestants which would pretty much destroy Romney's chances in the first place, even worse Romney completely bombed in the debate. So that leaves voters to chose in their eyes an isolationist coward (Ron Paul), or Rick Santorum who looked unremarkable in the debate. The only shocking part for me is how far back Santorum is. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Doublemint
Austria8366 Posts
On January 22 2012 11:08 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Newt Gingrich should be coming up next. Yeah, let´s see what sort of victory dance/speech he is gonna deliver^^ | ||
Corvette
United States433 Posts
On January 22 2012 11:07 forgottendreams wrote: IIRC South Carolina is extremely high in terms of religiosity for evangelical protestants which would pretty much destroy Romney's chances in the first place, even worse Romney completely bombed in the debate. So that leaves voters to chose in their eyes an isolationist coward (Ron Paul), or Rick Santorum who looked unremarkable in the debate. The only shocking part for me is how far back Santorum is. "coward"? | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![]() Anyways, Gingrich is starting to pull ahead right now, did he already make his speech? | ||
Terry Bogard
36 Posts
On January 22 2012 10:56 BobTheBuilder1377 wrote:See, this is the kind of ignorance I'm talking about. Ron Paul did not attend the Republican Convention four years ago because they didn't let him in. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Republican_National_Convention See, this is the kind of spin I'm talking about. Ron Paul did not attend the Republican Convention four years ago because he didn't want to. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul's_Campaign_for_Liberty#Rally_for_the_Republic | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
On January 22 2012 11:07 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: How much has Romney spent so far in three states, almost 20 million? How is it good, especially when it comes to PR, to spend more and more money to try and wrap up a long winded primary. Super PAC's have been a monster even Republicans admit is out of control it won't look good if Romney and his Super PAC's spend over 100 million to win just the nomination. 17 million from his campaign, another 12 from his Super PAC. | ||
Doublemint
Austria8366 Posts
On January 22 2012 11:10 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: As a Space nut Florida should be interesting as ya know Newt is going to mention the shuttle program. "Citizens, Patriots, good people of America, I am going to make sure that under the Presidency of my humble self Newt Gingrich, the Sky is the limit as it used to be before the Reign of Obama and his radical Czars!" | ||
| ||