Firefox as backup ;p
I used to use firefox a lot more until I got my macbook, where I was too lazy to switch my main browser
Forum Index > General Forum |
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
Firefox as backup ;p I used to use firefox a lot more until I got my macbook, where I was too lazy to switch my main browser | ||
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
| ||
anzient
Denmark119 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:23 DarkOptik wrote: Is it just me or does Adblock for Chrome not work for Jtv ads? It's definitely installed for me, but it doesn't seem to block ads embedded into Flash. It works fine with FF4/5 though. No it's not just you, and it's the sole reason I don't use chrome. | ||
Comeh
United States18918 Posts
Guess my eyes will have to die to the eternal whiteness :[[[[[[[[ | ||
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
| ||
Xapti
Canada2473 Posts
3.6 was nice, and I've had very very little problems with it. I will move on to 5 eventually, but it's still unknown as to when that may be. | ||
RaLakedaimon
United States1564 Posts
| ||
Legatus Lanius
2135 Posts
| ||
unichan
United States4223 Posts
| ||
rabidch
United States20288 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:03 xarthaz wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2011 05:47 rabidch wrote: On June 25 2011 02:58 ruthless69 wrote: On June 25 2011 01:17 Nizaris wrote: On June 25 2011 00:43 xarthaz wrote: On June 25 2011 00:21 Snipershot wrote: is it any good i switched to chrome along time ago :d On June 25 2011 00:22 Zhiroo wrote: If it's as bad as Firefox 4.0 I will not bother. Happy with Chrome at the moment. On June 25 2011 00:37 TadH wrote: I actually like IE9. I still use chrome though ;/ Ironic really. Chrome users claim to be the ones aspiring toward fast speed and efficient usage, while their browser fails at both these facets: its slower than opera, uses the most memory of all mainstream browsers, and doesnt have plugin flexibility to make up for it. In short, Chrome is a load of hot air. just because the latest iteration of a previously crap browser is 0.1% faster then chrome doesn't mean i'm gonna switch. Chrome will implement hardware acceleration soon too. Besides i call bullshit about chrome using more mem then ff or ie got a source? Chrome the only browser to resist pwn2own for years. I'm gonna ask you to open 15 tabs in chrome and then in FF. Chrome will most probably have 1 process for each tab with however much memory used because of it crash protection thingy. And then check FF with same 15 tabs open Should be one process and less memory because only one instance of an application is open. Not sure about IE but it sucks no matter what they do. I like the fact that Chrome keeps things in separate processes, for numerous reasons. If one tab crashes the whole thing doesn't burn and I don't have to restart the browser. As for increased memory usage from this it is really a negligible amount. Chrome is weakest in the add-ons. Firefox is still the best at this since it's very open source and been like this for a while, AdBlockPlus and NoScript are just a couple of examples. As for switching browsers, I've been on Opera and Chrome for years, switching is a pretty big hassle. Come on, at least be honest dude. Try opening 50 tabs in opera/ff. its gonna take around 500.600 meg assuming typical blog/forum style pages. then try it in chrome: it will take 2 gigs or more. Chrome is flat out terrible in memory use, its that simple. honest? rofl, i dont open 50 tabs in chrome. why should i? i never actually open that many tabs, maybe 20 max. its different for everybody, everybody uses browsers differently, you cant just make a blanket statement on why other people should use the browser you like. i always find it amusing that these arguments on internet browsers are such that people have to use the words "be honest" in replies to me i've also had resource issues in the past and present with all of the listed browsers and they all fail in some cases, but the multi process design of chrome makes it much easier to handle when something goes wrong in memory usage since individual processes can just be killed manually in chrome using its built in manager. this is really the design i wish more browsers had but dont, i think that creating new processes should be a little smarter than the way chrome does it but it is a step in the right direction to making a more easily controllable browser (hence why they have chrome OS now) On June 25 2011 09:23 DarkOptik wrote: Is it just me or does Adblock for Chrome not work for Jtv ads? It's definitely installed for me, but it doesn't seem to block ads embedded into Flash. It works fine with FF4/5 though. chrome does not block embeeded flash ads well, if at all--i have not seen it properly block flash ads ever. even opera does better than chrome at this, but if you want a browser that actually blocks everything you hate, use firefox. i dont know if chrome will ever improve upon this. the opera way of blocking ads is more crude than firefox and can actually sometimes be detrimental to performance with some badly made filters. On June 25 2011 15:06 daedelus wrote: I've had issues with some flash players breaking on Chrome. Firefox is going to load everything because it's been around for so long web designers are used to programing for it. With 5.0 Firefox is also catching back up in terms of speed. I find all the chrome fanboys strange. I tried chrome, it didn't load pages correctly broke flash players. Maybe it's gotten better but not loading all webpages is fail for a browser. That said I keep switching back and forth between safari(on Mac) and firefox. Safari keeps flash from loading in new tabs until you actually switch to the tab saving battery life for laptops. never had that issue, opera sure sucks at handling some webscripts though. | ||
Highways
Australia6098 Posts
This is pathetic from Mozilla, 4 was just released a month ago.... | ||
maitiu
Germany58 Posts
On June 25 2011 16:43 anzient wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2011 09:23 DarkOptik wrote: Is it just me or does Adblock for Chrome not work for Jtv ads? It's definitely installed for me, but it doesn't seem to block ads embedded into Flash. It works fine with FF4/5 though. No it's not just you, and it's the sole reason I don't use chrome. If Chrome blocked ads in streams I would have never seen the hilarious Old Spice ad ![]() | ||
Cryhavoc
372 Posts
On June 25 2011 17:27 Highways wrote: Wow wtf, updated to 5.0 and none of the addons work anymore. This is pathetic from Mozilla, 4 was just released a month ago.... just use this https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter all addons will work again | ||
Xapti
Canada2473 Posts
On June 25 2011 17:03 unichan wrote: Wow, the new Internet Explorer 9 is so much better. All of you bandwagoners using firefox lol? And the people here saying google chrome? LOLOL. Seriously both of those are so ugly, just use internet explorer... firefox is crap. I hope you're trolling. Firefox has extremely customizable appearance (in multiple ways), and is generally always ahead in web standards and feature support over Internet Explorer. Bandwagoning has nothing to do with it — it's about using an excellent product, one that caters to the user with a huge amount of extensions that will provide the exact features a user needs, and one which is highly configurable via screens like about:config. | ||
![]()
MrHoon
![]()
10183 Posts
Ever since FF4, it seems like any flash related site has a 1/4 chance of crashing my firefox, it's driving me mad. | ||
Depetrify
978 Posts
On June 26 2011 15:03 MrHoon wrote: just a question, has anyone else's Firefox been crashing like crazy these past weeks? Ever since FF4, it seems like any flash related site has a 1/4 chance of crashing my firefox, it's driving me mad. YES! I thought it was just me. | ||
enigamI
Canada385 Posts
![]() Edit : But honestly I don't have a huge preference between the big three. Lot of exaggerated hate going around in this thread... Try to take a deep breath, reread your post, then decide if it's worth it :S | ||
![]()
MrHoon
![]()
10183 Posts
On June 26 2011 15:07 Depetrify wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2011 15:03 MrHoon wrote: just a question, has anyone else's Firefox been crashing like crazy these past weeks? Ever since FF4, it seems like any flash related site has a 1/4 chance of crashing my firefox, it's driving me mad. YES! I thought it was just me. wow guess this wasn't my computer's problem Sometimes youtube will crash when I minimize or try to close firefox if it has 2 or more tags and it's really pissing me off, ctrl-alt-delete won't fix it. I just have to wait a long time until it finally asks me "U WANT TO CLOSE TABS YES/NO??" I really don't want to jump ship to chrome because DownloadthemAll is an amazing addon which chrome doesn't have ![]() edit: On a side note, if chrome has downloadthemall addon, I would jump ship. Or anything even similar to it. | ||
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
Eknoid4
United States902 Posts
I would think that was obvious | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Hyuk Dota 2![]() Flash ![]() ZerO ![]() Soulkey ![]() Pusan ![]() Sharp ![]() TY ![]() NaDa ![]() ToSsGirL ![]() Aegong ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • LUISG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • StrangeGG ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends |
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs TriGGeR
Cure vs SHIN
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|