EPTFFox 5.0 Beta Thread
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/5.0/releasenotes/
wtf, 4.0 was released a few months ago and 5.0 is already out?!
Firefox 5.0!
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
FFox 5.0 Beta Thread http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/5.0/releasenotes/ wtf, 4.0 was released a few months ago and 5.0 is already out?! | ||
|
Snipershot
United Kingdom59 Posts
| ||
|
Zhiroo
Kosovo2724 Posts
| ||
|
[N3O]r3d33m3r
Germany674 Posts
no it is not as "bad" as ff 4.0, it's a great improvement. Mozilla announced a few months ago that they wanna release newer versions faster to concide with other developers. it just sounds mor dandy if it goes from ff 5.0 to 6.0 than 3.6.4. or 4.0.7 this year we will see ff6 & 7 too =D as for the changes http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/5.0/releasenotes/ and all the bug fixes http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/5.0/releasenotes/buglist.html | ||
|
TadH
Canada1846 Posts
I still use chrome though ;/ | ||
|
DarKcS
Australia1237 Posts
Stability and ability to change add-ons without a full browser restart are the best changes though. | ||
|
xarthaz
1704 Posts
On June 25 2011 00:21 Snipershot wrote: is it any good i switched to chrome along time ago :d On June 25 2011 00:22 Zhiroo wrote: If it's as bad as Firefox 4.0 I will not bother. Happy with Chrome at the moment. On June 25 2011 00:37 TadH wrote: I actually like IE9. I still use chrome though ;/ Ironic really. Chrome users claim to be the ones aspiring toward fast speed and efficient usage, while their browser fails at both these facets: its slower than opera, uses the most memory of all mainstream browsers, and doesnt have plugin flexibility to make up for it. In short, Chrome is a load of hot air. | ||
|
DerBeefman
Germany226 Posts
But actually the new layout with tabs on the top and so is kinda nice. | ||
|
sh4w
United States713 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On June 25 2011 00:45 DerBeefman wrote: Hhmmm used old Firefox version till I auto-updated some days ago. I'm not really used to the new menu layout, it looks nice no doubt but its kinda weard that all options and functions are in that orange box top right :D. But actually the new layout with tabs on the top and so is kinda nice. Hitting 'alt' brings the menu back, just like on IE7+. I for one, noticed zero changes. Except that I don't have my adblock/greasemonkey icons visible anymore. Meh. <edit> What is wrong with 4? I liked it... | ||
|
Elasticity
3420 Posts
IE: random thing that need to open fast. FF5: All stuff with 30+ tabs divided in many group tabs. Chrome: + Show Spoiler [Click this only if you're 18+] + + Show Spoiler [I forgot at some places you need to be…] + + Show Spoiler [Are you really sure?] + pornnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Safari: nice icon sitting on the dock <3 LOL | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On June 25 2011 00:48 sh4w wrote: Yeah chrome is really really really really bad. I am probably going to stick with 3.6 forever. 4 was so bad that I'm not even going to try 5. The only (little) things that I don't like are the way bookmarks are shown as well as the different "work offline" menu. Otherwise, it's MUCH better than Firefox 3.x imho. | ||
|
Flameling
United States413 Posts
| ||
|
Gak2
Canada418 Posts
Downloading firefox 5 as I type this FYI, not updating leaves your browser with known security vulnerabilities | ||
|
[N3O]r3d33m3r
Germany674 Posts
On June 25 2011 00:45 DerBeefman wrote: Hhmmm used old Firefox version till I auto-updated some days ago. I'm not really used to the new menu layout, it looks nice no doubt but its kinda weard that all options and functions are in that orange box top right :D. But actually the new layout with tabs on the top and so is kinda nice. you can change the looks of it to anything you want, you can make it look the same as 3.6, you are not forced to use it as it came On June 25 2011 00:53 Gak2 wrote: FYI, not updating leaves your browser with known security vulnerabilities ye anybody who is not updating is a scrub | ||
|
Trang
Australia324 Posts
| ||
|
vnlegend
United States1389 Posts
They're still missing Chrome's open last tab closed option, and a blank page with previously closed tabs. That's about the only weakness. Firefox is great for surfing with adblockplus. Chrome's addon is not on par with FF's. | ||
|
Blyadischa
419 Posts
On June 25 2011 01:07 vnlegend wrote: The new 4.0-5.0 version of Firefox is good. It loads MUCH faster and they basically copied Chrome in terms of the tabs at the top + fast loading speed. I also like their extra 1-click options such as highlight http text -> open in new tab. They're still missing Chrome's open last tab closed option, and a blank page with previously closed tabs. That's about the only weakness. Firefox is great for surfing with adblockplus. Chrome's addon is not on par with FF's. History -> Recently Closed Tabs -> click | ||
|
Monokeros
United States2493 Posts
Chrome : Standard Browser Opera : porn. | ||
|
Nizaris
Belgium2230 Posts
On June 25 2011 00:43 xarthaz wrote: Ironic really. Chrome users claim to be the ones aspiring toward fast speed and efficient usage, while their browser fails at both these facets: its slower than opera, uses the most memory of all mainstream browsers, and doesnt have plugin flexibility to make up for it. In short, Chrome is a load of hot air. just because the latest iteration of a previously crap browser is 0.1% faster then chrome doesn't mean i'm gonna switch. Chrome will implement hardware acceleration soon too. Besides i call bullshit about chrome using more mem then ff or ie got a source? Chrome the only browser to resist pwn2own for years. | ||
| ||
