• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:47
CEST 04:47
KST 11:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202543Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up5LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced58
StarCraft 2
General
Clem Interview: "PvT is a bit insane right now" Serral wins EWC 2025 TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Would you prefer the game to be balanced around top-tier pro level or average pro level? Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? BW General Discussion Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Bitcoin discussion thread 9/11 Anniversary
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 608 users

Human Centipede II banned in the UK - Page 12

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 31 Next All
Please read the topic before responding to the title. The film has been cut and given a rating, it is no longer banned. - KwarK
emythrel
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United Kingdom2599 Posts
June 07 2011 23:01 GMT
#221
Damn i don't remember a film being banned since The Exorcist...... this must be some heavy shit if it got banned in the UK... we have pretty liberal film ratings these days, films that were 18's when the were released 15 years ago are now 12's lol
When there is nothing left to lose but your dignity, it is already gone.
Kamais_Ookin
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada4218 Posts
June 07 2011 23:01 GMT
#222
On June 08 2011 07:52 vyyye wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2011 07:50 Sindsygafnatur wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:46 Bleak wrote:
Sounds like good material for Cannibal Corpse to write a new song.

True! I wonder why their music haven't been banned, if you follow the logic of the people who agree with the ban on the movie. http://www.darklyrics.com/c/cannibalcorpse.html awesome stuff.

Their lyrics are almost as good as their music. Quality writing right there.
I'm so happy that people here acknowledge the greatness of Cannibal Corpse!
I <3 Plexa.
D10
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Brazil3409 Posts
June 07 2011 23:03 GMT
#223
Hehehe, I smiled while I read this

Banning something is a tad too strong, but screw it, this movie is so retarded it deserves it
" We are not humans having spiritual experiences. - We are spirits having human experiences." - Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
NIJ
Profile Joined March 2010
1012 Posts
June 07 2011 23:03 GMT
#224
On June 08 2011 07:48 skeldark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2011 07:44 zobz wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:38 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:32 Olinim wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:15 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:11 Klaus1986 wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:05 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 06:56 Sindsygafnatur wrote:
On June 08 2011 06:49 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 06:42 Sindsygafnatur wrote:
[quote]

I heard about this movie...where someone kills another person, just because he's evil and mean. Have you seen it?

you dont get the difference about a movie where someone shot someone and a movie where they show how people are tortured in detail?


Okay so movies involving torture should be banned because they make people dangerous. Are there other unpleasant things we should be sheltered from? How about people being mean to each other? People who don't wash their hands after they pee? God they make me wanna blow shit up!


I never say it makes you dangerous. a child perhaps... if you want to watch this you are allready dangerous.

The majority have the right to deny rights. that why we make laws. To deny rights of minority to the better good of all.
Only because there is a law dont mean it must be good. we should ask ourself every time if our rules are good or if we need new rules.
But there is no overall problem on denying something, our society base on this.

So i say the right of many to live secure is more worth than the right of few who likes to watch how people get torture.

The danger that this ill people will harm someone more likely because they see such movies is small but still big enough to deny them this right.

I can understand that people want to give them the right to watch this. even if they are dangerous watching this movie must not mean the start to act like this. But i think the little chance is enough.


This may be the dumbest post I have ever read in my entire life. The majority have absolutely no right to determine what is acceptable to a minority and indeed is one of the founding aspects of democracy everywhere. To protect minority rights is paramount.

You are a dunce.


so we dont have to right to deny a person the right to kill someone?
we dont have the right to make laws and rules?
We determine whats acceptable with every law we write. we do this everyday our hole life in every social group. we make rules. this is how society works.
this have nothing to do with democracy at all. one of the rules of democracy is that we everyone have the kind of the same rights. not that everyone have all rights.
perhaps you misunderstand my use of the word minority.
i don't mean a special group i mean the group who want to break the rule.

im sorry when i dont end with a blaming. i know that for people like you this is normal and social standard. and you know what? Here you perhaps have the right to do so. I would give it to you because you right of speaking like you want is in this case more worth than my right of not being blamed. you have to weigh, every time... ;')

1. Your posts are unbelievably stupid.
2. I don't believe English is your first language, though on account of 1 it's not impossible.
3. You don't understand what a "right" is at least in terms of law. Either that or your comprehension of the English language is so abysmal you can't properly articulate a single thought.


1. looks like you are form that group that learned to start your post with a blaming.
you should team up with the other guy who comes from the "end a post with a blaming" group.
2. give this man 100 points. btw you can check by just looking at the header of a post....
strange that you didnt find this out yet after 500 posts.
3. i dont talk over a right in terms of law. how can i talk over right in terms of law when i talk over right to make a law?

Sorry if english isn't your first language and you're a bit handicapped, but take the extra time you need to make a post that's actually comprehensible will you? I have no idea what that last sentence is supposed to mean.


Why are you sorry for that? im not sorry for you that English is your first language.
if you dont understand nr 3, it have nothing to do with language^^

Anyways i wanted to give some arguments why its not a violence of freedom of speach or art if you ban this movie. I have the feeling my english is just to bad to make my points clear.

And i have the feeling most of the guys here are to young and to be honest just not able to make such a discussion. it was a mistake to start it. TL is not the place for stuff like this.
So sorry for my interruption. go on with "yeah freedom of speech" "shit movie".....

Ok I'm not gonna call you dumb but your english is clearly lacking cause some of your posts are incomprehensible. I don't think its just me since everyone else seems to be clueless about what you're trying to communicate like I am.

And secondly you obviously have no idea how civil rights works. Or what tyranny of majority is if you think majority has rights to deny minority rights.
Act of thinking logically cannot possibly be natural to the human mind. If it were, then mathematics would be everybody's easiest course at school and our species would not have taken several millennia to figure out the scientific method -NDT
Yiska
Profile Joined November 2010
141 Posts
June 07 2011 23:04 GMT
#225
On June 08 2011 07:48 skeldark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2011 07:44 zobz wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:38 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:32 Olinim wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:15 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:11 Klaus1986 wrote:
On June 08 2011 07:05 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 06:56 Sindsygafnatur wrote:
On June 08 2011 06:49 skeldark wrote:
On June 08 2011 06:42 Sindsygafnatur wrote:
[quote]

I heard about this movie...where someone kills another person, just because he's evil and mean. Have you seen it?

you dont get the difference about a movie where someone shot someone and a movie where they show how people are tortured in detail?


Okay so movies involving torture should be banned because they make people dangerous. Are there other unpleasant things we should be sheltered from? How about people being mean to each other? People who don't wash their hands after they pee? God they make me wanna blow shit up!


I never say it makes you dangerous. a child perhaps... if you want to watch this you are allready dangerous.

The majority have the right to deny rights. that why we make laws. To deny rights of minority to the better good of all.
Only because there is a law dont mean it must be good. we should ask ourself every time if our rules are good or if we need new rules.
But there is no overall problem on denying something, our society base on this.

So i say the right of many to live secure is more worth than the right of few who likes to watch how people get torture.

The danger that this ill people will harm someone more likely because they see such movies is small but still big enough to deny them this right.

I can understand that people want to give them the right to watch this. even if they are dangerous watching this movie must not mean the start to act like this. But i think the little chance is enough.


This may be the dumbest post I have ever read in my entire life. The majority have absolutely no right to determine what is acceptable to a minority and indeed is one of the founding aspects of democracy everywhere. To protect minority rights is paramount.

You are a dunce.


so we dont have to right to deny a person the right to kill someone?
we dont have the right to make laws and rules?
We determine whats acceptable with every law we write. we do this everyday our hole life in every social group. we make rules. this is how society works.
this have nothing to do with democracy at all. one of the rules of democracy is that we everyone have the kind of the same rights. not that everyone have all rights.
perhaps you misunderstand my use of the word minority.
i don't mean a special group i mean the group who want to break the rule.

im sorry when i dont end with a blaming. i know that for people like you this is normal and social standard. and you know what? Here you perhaps have the right to do so. I would give it to you because you right of speaking like you want is in this case more worth than my right of not being blamed. you have to weigh, every time... ;')

1. Your posts are unbelievably stupid.
2. I don't believe English is your first language, though on account of 1 it's not impossible.
3. You don't understand what a "right" is at least in terms of law. Either that or your comprehension of the English language is so abysmal you can't properly articulate a single thought.


1. looks like you are form that group that learned to start your post with a blaming.
you should team up with the other guy who comes from the "end a post with a blaming" group.
2. give this man 100 points. btw you can check by just looking at the header of a post....
strange that you didnt find this out yet after 500 posts.
3. i dont talk over a right in terms of law. how can i talk over right in terms of law when i talk over right to make a law?

Sorry if english isn't your first language and you're a bit handicapped, but take the extra time you need to make a post that's actually comprehensible will you? I have no idea what that last sentence is supposed to mean.


Why are you sorry for that? im not sorry for you that English is your first language.
if you dont understand nr 3, it have nothing to do with language^^

Anyways i wanted to give some arguments why its not a violence of freedom of speach or art if you ban this movie. I have the feeling my english is just to bad to make my points clear.

And i have the feeling most of the guys here are to young and to be honest just not able to make such a discussion. it was a mistake to start it. TL is not the place for stuff like this.
So sorry for my interruption. go on with "yeah freedom of speech" "shit movie".....


Actually the age ad hominem does work against you. Fairly sure most of the people argueing against your point are older than you and that is not a coincidence . You've yet to make the required experience to understand how ignorant your statement is, essentially starting in the fact that you've yet to see the movie. Baffling.
Bleak
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Turkey3059 Posts
June 07 2011 23:07 GMT
#226
Also, looking the story, they might have as well named it "The Daisy Chain"
"I am a beacon of knowledge blazing out across a black sea of ignorance. "
muse5187
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
1125 Posts
June 07 2011 23:07 GMT
#227
This is some freaky stuff. Not ban worthy though. Just dont sell it in stores.
Deekin[
Profile Joined December 2010
Serbia1713 Posts
June 07 2011 23:08 GMT
#228
ah this film, I look forward to it, I love the saw film with alot of gore and phsycological stuff. Might even be worth going to the cinema.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ CJ Entus fighting! I am a Leta, Hydra, Mind and (ofcourse) Firebathero fan. (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Shiragaku
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong4308 Posts
June 07 2011 23:15 GMT
#229
On June 08 2011 08:08 Deekin[ wrote:
ah this film, I look forward to it, I love the saw film with alot of gore and phsycological stuff. Might even be worth going to the cinema.

I see how it is...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serbian_Film
+ Show Spoiler +
Not racist
skeldark
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2223 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-07 23:22:11
June 07 2011 23:19 GMT
#230
ok, ok last try....

I used some word that you guys misunderstand. and perhaps your right i just misused them.

1)
Even in a society that have the main right of freedom of speech it can be ok to ban a movie.
Every right stops where it hurts another right.
Its just to easy and simple to say banning is always bad and we need total freedom of speech.

2) However When you ban a movie you cut the rights of the people who want to see it.
So you must weigh if the right of this group is more worth than the right of the other group, who are afraid that such movie can be dangerous.

3) in this special case i think the 2. right win.
Because even if the chance is very small that people who watch this do something dangerous,
it is pretty obvious that people who want to see such movies have big mental problems.
So if we cut the right of people to watch such movies -that let them feel good when they see people torture- it is OK in my opinion.
Save gaming: kill esport
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
June 07 2011 23:21 GMT
#231
In society we build rules which we are all to obey, else face consequences like prison. I take no issue with restricting freedom, as long as freedom is restricted in ways that I accept. You're not allowed to steal from people: good. You're not allowed to hit people: good. You're no allowed to sell dehumanizing, gore porn: good.

If a work doesn't have redeeming social value I don't mind that it is banned. I think people who argue for 100% freedom are silly. You have 100% freedom if you want it. It's just that you have to face the real world. If you want to live in society, then sacrifice some of your freedoms. I want to be protected.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
vyyye
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden3917 Posts
June 07 2011 23:22 GMT
#232
On June 08 2011 08:19 skeldark wrote:

it is pretty obvious that people who want to see such movies have big mental problems.

This is why no one is taking you seriously. Well, one of the reasons. Your complete logical fallacies play a part too.
meep
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States1699 Posts
June 07 2011 23:22 GMT
#233
This movie is so bad, I guess the only thing you'd be missing is the comedy.
閑静 しずか (ノ・_・)ノ
thekibk
Profile Joined April 2010
United States116 Posts
June 07 2011 23:25 GMT
#234
On June 08 2011 08:01 emythrel wrote:
Damn i don't remember a film being banned since The Exorcist...... this must be some heavy shit if it got banned in the UK... we have pretty liberal film ratings these days, films that were 18's when the were released 15 years ago are now 12's lol


Lol, I got interested and did some research on what has been banned. There have been 11 bans in the United Kingdom:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banned_films#United_Kingdom

only Three Remained Banned:
Visions of Ecstacy (for religious crimes)
Mikey (A Child murders people)
Grotesque (Japanese)

I don't really care. I hate all forms of horror movies. But freedom of speech seems kinda important, even though this would inspire some fucked up shit.
Corn is no place for a mighty warrior!
Zocat
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2229 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-07 23:27:38
June 07 2011 23:26 GMT
#235
On June 08 2011 08:19 skeldark wrote:
ok, ok last try....

I used some word that you guys misunderstand. and perhaps your right i just misused them.

1)
Even in a society that have the main right of freedom of speech it can be ok to ban a movie.
Every right stops where it hurts another right.
Its just to easy and simple to say banning is always bad and we need total freedom of speech.

2) However When you ban a movie you cut the rights of the people who want to see it.
So you must weigh if the right of this group is more worth than the right of the other group, who are afraid that such movie can be dangerous.

3) in this special case i think the 2. right win.
Because even if the chance is very small that people who watch this do something dangerous,
it is pretty obvious that people who want to see such movies have big mental problems.
So if we cut the right of people to watch such movies -that let them feel good when they see people torture- it is OK in my opinion.


3.
So you are okay that the German governments bans all "killerspiele" (shooters for us non-Germans^^), because many people claim that violent video games are the reason for murders & shooting sprees?
And keep in mind that those people have the same "facts" backing up their statements like you do: none. Or you might enlighten a lot of us here and show a scientific study that shows that people who watch those movies have big mental problems.

skeldark
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2223 Posts
June 07 2011 23:28 GMT
#236
On June 08 2011 08:22 vyyye wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2011 08:19 skeldark wrote:

it is pretty obvious that people who want to see such movies have big mental problems.

This is why no one is taking you seriously. Well, one of the reasons. Your complete logical fallacies play a part too.

you guys think its fun to watch such movies?
i was thinking you agree with me that its shit and just argue for the general freedom of speech.
So if you really enjoy stuff like this than i total misunderstand the situation!
If you feel something like fun when you look such crap than there is just nothing i have to say to you...
Save gaming: kill esport
Befree
Profile Joined April 2010
695 Posts
June 07 2011 23:29 GMT
#237
I don't think I'll ever understand why this or even other milder horror films are created.

I'm just glad its extreme violence that they are banning a movie for, rather than things like pornography, language, or political message. I think our priorities in censorship are at least getting more on track.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
June 07 2011 23:30 GMT
#238
On June 08 2011 08:19 skeldark wrote:
ok, ok last try....

I used some word that you guys misunderstand. and perhaps your right i just misused them.

1)
Even in a society that have the main right of freedom of speech it can be ok to ban a movie.
Every right stops where it hurts another right.
Its just to easy and simple to say banning is always bad and we need total freedom of speech.

2) However When you ban a movie you cut the rights of the people who want to see it.
So you must weigh if the right of this group is more worth than the right of the other group, who are afraid that such movie can be dangerous.

3) in this special case i think the 2. right win.
Because even if the chance is very small that people who watch this do something dangerous,
it is pretty obvious that people who want to see such movies have big mental problems.
So if we cut the right of people to watch such movies -that let them feel good when they see people torture- it is OK in my opinion.


First of all, no, it's not obvious at all. In fact, you're just wrong.

Then there's this other issue of why is it wrong for them to enjoy such movies just because you don't? Are you the moral authority of mankind? (You're not) Just like there's people who enjoy scat sex (that's sex where poo is involved) there are people who enjoy these movies. All you have to do is not get involved and it wont bother or disturb your life in the slightest. Just move along. <insert obligatory deal-with-it pic here>
vyyye
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden3917 Posts
June 07 2011 23:32 GMT
#239
On June 08 2011 08:28 skeldark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2011 08:22 vyyye wrote:
On June 08 2011 08:19 skeldark wrote:

it is pretty obvious that people who want to see such movies have big mental problems.

This is why no one is taking you seriously. Well, one of the reasons. Your complete logical fallacies play a part too.

you guys think its fun to watch such movies?
i was thinking you agree with me that its shit and just argue for the general freedom of speech.
So if you really enjoy stuff like this than i total misunderstand the situation!
If you feel something like fun when you look such crap than there is just nothing i have to say to you...

Oh? So if my preferences in entertainment clashes with yours you are somehow superior to me?
XiaoJoyce-
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
China2908 Posts
June 07 2011 23:33 GMT
#240
I just watch this movie 2-3 months ago!

But it is not as disgusting as what people might think. In fact, I find it very boring because I dont understand anything at all.

When I noe this movie from friend, It make me want to watch because I want to know how 3 people joined up to form a centipede, what is the story behind, what kind of difficulties they have to face to go back to normal life. I expect alot alot from the movie.

But when I watch, they are just joined up by using the cloth used to wrap mummies with, and wrap 1 face to another backside. 2 times. To form a human centipede with 3 people.

The story behind it, some guy want to have human centipede as pet.

If u wan me summary the whole plot, it is "Life of the centipede and it's master" for 2 hours. So u noe how boring it is?

When I start to feel dissapointing, I somehow predict what kind of scary thing or disgusting thing the movie is trying to do to scare me. I predict it quite accurate so when it happens, I just feel "..."

Ah...Don't feel sad if it got ban, because I feel the sequel, they make it look interesting so u will go watch but when u watch, u will feel dissapointed.
Pew! Pew! Chitty Chitty Bang Bang!
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 31 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#43
PiGStarcraft400
CranKy Ducklings135
SteadfastSC91
davetesta47
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft400
RuFF_SC2 121
SteadfastSC 91
-ZergGirl 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 813
ggaemo 403
Sharp 66
JulyZerg 62
Sexy 48
Icarus 10
Dewaltoss 5
Stormgate
WinterStarcraft1395
UpATreeSC204
Nina101
Dota 2
monkeys_forever181
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 285
Other Games
summit1g10020
shahzam1580
Fnx 901
C9.Mang0245
ViBE204
Maynarde104
Trikslyr40
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1117
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH151
• practicex 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush923
Other Games
• Scarra1266
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Summer Champion…
8h 13m
Stormgate Nexus
11h 13m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
13h 13m
The PondCast
1d 7h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 21h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.