EPTIt's remarkable either way, though.
Man travels 96500km, takes 37000 pics of space. - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
It's remarkable either way, though. | ||
Medzo
United States627 Posts
These pictures are all taken when the earth is facing away from the sun. So its not really as if you were viewing from the earths perspective. What he could of done is take a picture everyday for a year and then maybe have a sorta accurate view. edit; actually I dont understand why he had to travel at all to do this. If you could take 2 pictures (to get a view from top to bottom) on the same longitude every night for a year you would get an accurate result. | ||
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
| ||
|
Freak Ivan
United States11 Posts
| ||
|
Mafs
Canada458 Posts
| ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
means no God 37000 pictures and no one showed aliens means no aliens So which star is closest to us on that 3D thingy? User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
judochopaction
United States533 Posts
On May 08 2011 04:46 DorF wrote: Where is the earth ? my friend... at the center? i dont really know how to make you understand if you dont get it. hes on the earth? | ||
|
RyanRushia
United States2748 Posts
| ||
|
Roeder
Denmark735 Posts
Brb staring at that picture for 20 mins. | ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
On May 08 2011 04:51 Mafs wrote: Cool, but sucks you can zoom in and get greater resolution after a certain point. Im waiting for more information on the exo-planets being discovered. Why dont you just launch your own rocket and go out there yourself? | ||
|
Kolvacs
Canada1203 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On May 08 2011 04:51 exeexe wrote: 37000 pictures and no one showed God means no God 37000 pictures and no one showed aliens means no aliens So which star is closest to us on that 3D thingy? what? what does that have to do with anything, in addition to being irrelevant to it's own conclusions (regardless of whether the conclusions are true or not) great derail "37000 pictures and no one showed humans means no humans" flawless logic right? | ||
|
Gatsbi
United States1134 Posts
| ||
|
Quesadilla
United States1814 Posts
| ||
|
DKo
United States187 Posts
| ||
|
onewingedmoogle
Canada434 Posts
| ||
|
Beef Noodles
United States937 Posts
| ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
On May 08 2011 04:57 GGTeMpLaR wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 08 2011 04:51 exeexe wrote: 37000 pictures and no one showed God means no God 37000 pictures and no one showed aliens means no aliens So which star is closest to us on that 3D thingy? what? what does that have to do with anything, in addition to being irrelevant to it's own conclusions (regardless of whether the conclusions are true or not) great derail "37000 pictures and no one showed humans means no humans" flawless logic right? Lets not discuss if its a derail or not, because that would be the true derail. Anyways the pictures was made by a human ... so there goes your proof. | ||
|
MiniRoman
Canada3953 Posts
exeexe: u started the derailing with something stupid. #1 - God and Aliens are not the same thing. Maybe to certain people who believe Alien's = god but God does not = alien. #2 - 37,000 pictures is not enough proof of space to say "no aliens". Aliens prolly further away. If any were close by they be cloaked like Arb and full of predators probably. (P.S. Think about how huge space is) | ||
|
boon2537
United States905 Posts
this is incredible ^^ | ||
| ||
