|
On December 17 2004 20:16 Gene wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2004 12:30 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote:
Buddha was outside almost his whole life. to be in solitutde does not mean to live inside your house o.O chosen solitude is different from forced solitude. teroru, have you ever seen Runaway Jury? it seems everyone on this forum has seen every movie ever. You never have, but in that post you reminded me of that police officer who kept going "ALL SHE WANTS IS A HANDOUT"
i have not seen that movie, is it worth seeing?
And in contrast to everyone on this forum, i watch a movie maybe once every 3 months. Sometimes i will watch 2 in one night, but thats as rare as taking part in watching lesbian porn.
|
this is the internet you realise, and with an all text message, with no smilies, or italics present in the original post, and no previous history with you, its pretty easy to take someone for what they say. Had this conversation taken place in person, i doubt i would have slipped up the same way. Granted perhaps i should not have jumped on you so quickly after already admitting i didnt know you, but someone comes up in this thread using the terms niggers & fags, and i think its understandable how i got mixed up.
|
On December 17 2004 21:46 n00bsaibot wrote:
this is the internet you realise, and with an all text message, with no smilies, or italics present in the original post, and no previous history with you, its pretty easy to take someone for what they say. Had this conversation taken place in person, i doubt i would have slipped up the same way. Granted perhaps i should not have jumped on you so quickly after already admitting i didnt know you, but someone comes up in this thread using the terms niggers & fags, and i think its understandable how i got mixed up.
Understandable, yes. i'm just saying that i found it shocking. I didn't expect you to misunderstand me is all.
I called them niggers and fags because i felt it lent weight to what i had to say. Black people have/had to deal with being called nigger, and homo's deal with being called fags. This makes their life harder being that they are freaks in their own right.
But with people like baal posting in this thread, you are very right in understanding ur misunderstanding. 
|
On December 17 2004 20:35 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote:
Why would he want a gay bash? He is gay...
And biblically, all gays that act on their homosexual tendencies are going to hell.
Yup...
I haven't even read the whole thread, but, wow, what a distortion of the way things are now, according to the Bible. According to the Bible, homosexuality is no worse than me lying to you. If I lie, do I go to hell? Not necessarily. Just because they sin doesn't mean they are damned (though they probably are heathens [I've recently become fond of that word]) that doesn't mean every gay man, or woman is an unbeliever, and is doomed to hell.
|
On December 17 2004 22:05 SickofLife wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2004 20:35 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote:
Why would he want a gay bash? He is gay...
And biblically, all gays that act on their homosexual tendencies are going to hell.
Yup... I haven't even read the whole thread, but, wow, what a distortion of the way things are now, according to the Bible. According to the Bible, homosexuality is no worse than me lying to you. If I lie, do I go to hell? Not necessarily. Just because they sin doesn't mean they are damned (though they probably are heathens [I've recently become fond of that word]) that doesn't mean every gay man, or woman is an unbeliever, and is doomed to hell.
Are you telling me you honestly believe that there is not a single Christian Believer who says homosexuals are going to hell? We're not talking about correct interpretations about what the bible says/means. We are talking about common interpretations. Being that i have been told i am going to hell by many Christians, i would even venture to say that it is the more common interpretation.
But please, lets end it here. This thread is not about religion, nor should be. Please leave it at that.
|
|
|
yeah it is pretty sad.
also... all heterosexuals should commit suicide? that is really stupid. also, i have many friends who are gay, so don't think i am just bashing you.
of course peoples likes and dislikes differ on everything, that does not mean anyone should commit suicide. anybody.
|
Hope the kid can lead a normal life.
|
That really makes me grateful for having a face O_O
|
On December 18 2004 01:07 wishterran wrote:
yeah it is pretty sad.
also... all heterosexuals should commit suicide? that is really stupid. also, i have many friends who are gay, so don't think i am just bashing you.
of course peoples likes and dislikes differ on everything, that does not mean anyone should commit suicide. anybody.
Agreed, that is pretty stupid. Thats why i said: Hell, if i lived by your rules, i'd tell you to all commit suicide. It boggles the mind how any heterosexual cannot wish to end his life. You're fucking heterosexual. Might as well be born without a face. ;(
|
On December 17 2004 22:05 SickofLife wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2004 20:35 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote:
Why would he want a gay bash? He is gay...
And biblically, all gays that act on their homosexual tendencies are going to hell.
Yup... I haven't even read the whole thread, but, wow, what a distortion of the way things are now, according to the Bible. According to the Bible, homosexuality is no worse than me lying to you. If I lie, do I go to hell? Not necessarily. Just because they sin doesn't mean they are damned (though they probably are heathens [I've recently become fond of that word]) that doesn't mean every gay man, or woman is an unbeliever, and is doomed to hell.
I'm well aware, I am using the same hyperbole most believers of the bible have.
I'd also like to note that heathen is a pagan(by the celtic term, so neo-pagan I guess), not a non-believer. It is as bad as calling black people niggers or gay people fags..please respect my religion if nothing else.
FrEaK
|
Teroru comparing being called a nigger or a fag with having no freaking face its stupid, would you rather have no face and being heterosexual? wtf is that -_-;
SickofLife i can find arround a dozen of quotes of the bible condenming homosexuality with eternal hell, read the bible 
And the difference between sidharta and this girl its that this girl is "forced" to live in solitude, she can have a life through the internet as eri said and thats what will probably happen but death before she even has concience is a better choice imo, probably because i have a very different concept of death of most of you...
And n00bsaibot i had one close death-experience and no i didnt feel an urge to live, i guess now you will say im fucked up because admiting your mistakes its not something you will do, in the other posts i showed you several mistakes wich you totally ignored and continued arguing.
But with people like baal posting in this thread, you are very right in understanding ur misunderstanding.
what was that suppoused to mean -_-
|
United Kingdom10597 Posts
|
And the difference between sidharta and this girl its that this girl is "forced" to live in solitude, she can have a life through the internet as eri said and thats what will probably happen but death before she even has concience is a better choice imo, probably because i have a very different concept of death of most of you...
I dont feel like finding it, but were you not saying earlier that youd be perfectly happy even killing the girl now that shes alive and 2 years old? If all you ever meant was abortion, then i would probably aggree with you, as i support abortion in instances where children are born into unloving homes (i.e. kids having kids) for the same reasons you think this person will have a miserable life. Although the key there is the lack of love and desire for the child, at least this kid has parents who do actually want her, and a likely plethora of people who feel sorry for her, and whether or not its pity, will treat her kindly.
However, you continue to maintain this idea that she is forceably disallowed from participating in society. Explain this. What do you see happening when she walks out the front door and goes to the grocery store at age 33?
|
On December 18 2004 19:27 Chibi[OWNS] wrote:no offense but i don't evben look at a girl unless she sparks my fancy in a club for instance. mind you i have fucked up tastes but anything over 12 stone is goin to turn me off and i think it's a totally realistic viewpoint that less advantaged peoples are treated 'worse' than others. too bad but that's life  i'm a fucking ugly little shit but i have an ounce of common sense and if someone's goodlooking (dont care about age - and this is a totally new discussion altogetjer) i'll fucking want to bone them no matter what they say and no matter how they act.
Lucky for me, i share your view. I want to fuck at least 80% of bw players.
i bet ur included.
|
n00b i never meant i'd have the soul to kill the girl at 2 years of age. i meant they should have killed her at birth or very, VERY shortly after. doing so now would be wrong. but also having her live life as she looks presently i find rather inhumane also.
|
|
|
On December 18 2004 21:42 Teroru wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2004 19:27 Chibi[OWNS] wrote:no offense but i don't evben look at a girl unless she sparks my fancy in a club for instance. mind you i have fucked up tastes but anything over 12 stone is goin to turn me off and i think it's a totally realistic viewpoint that less advantaged peoples are treated 'worse' than others. too bad but that's life i'm a fucking ugly little shit but i have an ounce of common sense and if someone's goodlooking (dont care about age - and this is a totally new discussion altogetjer) i'll fucking want to bone them no matter what they say and no matter how they act. Lucky for me, i share your view. I want to fuck at least 80% of bw players. i bet ur included.
thank god you hate my guts too much for being in that 80%... i can sleep tight tonight :D
|
On December 18 2004 19:52 n00bsaibot wrote:Show nested quote +And the difference between sidharta and this girl its that this girl is "forced" to live in solitude, she can have a life through the internet as eri said and thats what will probably happen but death before she even has concience is a better choice imo, probably because i have a very different concept of death of most of you...
I dont feel like finding it, but were you not saying earlier that youd be perfectly happy even killing the girl now that shes alive and 2 years old? If all you ever meant was abortion, then i would probably aggree with you, as i support abortion in instances where children are born into unloving homes (i.e. kids having kids) for the same reasons you think this person will have a miserable life. Although the key there is the lack of love and desire for the child, at least this kid has parents who do actually want her, and a likely plethora of people who feel sorry for her, and whether or not its pity, will treat her kindly. However, you continue to maintain this idea that she is forceably disallowed from participating in society. Explain this. What do you see happening when she walks out the front door and goes to the grocery store at age 33?
Well you say she should be aborted but not killed after, that kind of explains the point and i think you actually think its brutal murder after the birth.
Anyway we seem to disagree in the possible future of that girl, you picture her buying stuff at the grocery store, i picture her walking on the street and people staring at her whispering between then with scared faces and moving over to let her pass...
So i want you to assume she will have a misserable future... you have a crystal ball and you saw it... if that is the case would you choose to kill her now?
|
baaal so you would take your own life if you had an accident that left you with no face?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
