EPTOn March 15 2011 07:09 HolydaKing wrote:
now is that good or bad? depends if it is fixable right? ^^
now is that good or bad? depends if it is fixable right? ^^
at this stage nothing at any of these reactors is fixable :/
Crisis in Japan - Page 120
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Thread is about the various issues surrounding Japan in the aftermath of the recent earthquake. Don't bring the shit side of the internet to the thread, and post with the realization that this thread is very important, and very real, to your fellow members. Do not post speculative and unconfirmed news you saw on TV or anywhere else. Generally the more dramatic it sounds the less likely it's true. | ||
|
naim
41 Posts
at this stage nothing at any of these reactors is fixable :/ | ||
|
Railgan
Switzerland1509 Posts
On March 15 2011 07:09 HolydaKing wrote: now is that good or bad? depends if it is fixable right? ^^ if there is a defect its most likly baid | ||
|
hugman
Sweden4644 Posts
That's about as vague as you can get, NO ONE can draw a conclusion from that | ||
|
bebe01
Korea (South)512 Posts
| ||
|
Razith
Canada431 Posts
" 2208: However, there has been no sharp rise in radiation levels at reactor 2, Mr Edano adds." I believe they mean reactor 2 as you can see the followup statement references reactor 2. This is reported on BBC. | ||
|
AntiLegend
Germany247 Posts
On March 14 2011 13:42 AntiLegend wrote: maybe my quote was a little bit too short, but the question is, what happens to the sea water which is being pumped into the reactor containments. at some point it will also get too hot and have to be replaced by new sea water, but by this time it should be highly radioactive. follow up on this: news agency dapd has asked NISA what happens to the sea water which has been pumped into the reactors, the answer is: the radiated water is just pumped back into the sea | ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
the problem with reactor no. 2 is that NYT says there might be a leak, so they can't actually completely fill up the reactor vessel with seawater anymore. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/world/asia/15nuclear.html?_r=1&ref=global-home | ||
|
Slago
Canada726 Posts
| ||
|
AntiLegend
Germany247 Posts
On March 15 2011 07:55 Slago wrote: oh man there now predicting a 9.0 quake to hit where I live I'm so creeped out now that is so sad was any timeframe given? | ||
|
dump
Japan514 Posts
On March 15 2011 07:55 Slago wrote: oh man there now predicting a 9.0 quake to hit where I live I'm so creeped out now that is so sad Wait what where? I'm in Vancouver, which is on the ring of fire... so... | ||
|
hugman
Sweden4644 Posts
| ||
|
Maggeus
France277 Posts
On March 15 2011 08:01 hugman wrote: Venting the steam from the water that cooled the molten core? That does NOT sound good They've already been doing that since the beginning to avoid a vapor explosion. The steam is absolutely nothing as a threat compared to a real leak. Btw, they announced the containment building from the 2nd reactor has a leak, but the radiation did not rise. I can't understand how it could not rise, apart from the fact there's no meltdown in it. And even so, this seems strange. NEWS : An explosion has been heard at n°2. | ||
|
Razith
Canada431 Posts
http://live.reuters.com/Event/Japan_earthquake2 BREAKING NEWS: Blast heard at 6:10 a.m. at Fukushima's No.2 reactor: gov't (08:02) http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/ | ||
|
AntiLegend
Germany247 Posts
"Breaking news: Blast heard at no.2 reactor" | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
dump
Japan514 Posts
On March 15 2011 08:05 Razith wrote: FLASH: Explosion heard at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi No.2 reactor: Jiji News Agency http://live.reuters.com/Event/Japan_earthquake2 BREAKING NEWS: Blast heard at 6:10 a.m. at Fukushima's No.2 reactor: gov't (08:02) http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/ NHK analyst says that there's a possibility that the containment vessel is compromised... | ||
|
Maggeus
France277 Posts
On March 15 2011 08:07 HolydaKing wrote: oh shit that sounds seriously not good. If it's the same result as the reactor 1 and 3, we could say we evaded the worst... But there's already a leak at 2 before the explosion (surely hydrogen explosion), so... | ||
|
Razith
Canada431 Posts
On March 15 2011 08:08 dump wrote: NHK analyst says that there's a possibility that the containment vessel is compromised... Reactor 1 and 3 both survived an explosion, however they stated reactor 2 containment vessel had a defect.. that is what worries me. Plus it was only 'heard' so lets wait and see. Hopefully everything is still intact. | ||
|
AntiLegend
Germany247 Posts
| ||
|
dump
Japan514 Posts
| ||
| ||
