EPTPedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure - Page 18
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
mrblue182
United States151 Posts
| ||
|
Mellotron
United States329 Posts
But... you bring the "speech" to their doorstep and suddenly the will to play politically correct diminishes to nothing. You know, it wouldnt hurt my neighbor at all if i took a shit on my lawn every day right in front of him. Its disgusting. But, all id have to do is say hey, its my yard, its natural, and you dont have to watch. I could probably even say its my "right" and its my "freedom of speech". But i dont do it. Why? Because even if it felt GREAT to me to shit on my lawn i know it bothers him. I know what it feels like to be disgusted, even though i (in this fantasy scenario as the lawn shitter himself) am not disgusted by it. I take it upon myself to hide the pieces of myself that upset others. I do this to ensure peace in a world constantly split and constantly inconsistent. I dont shit on my lawn in front of you. I spare you that even though its my "freedom" and there "is no such thing as right and wrong". So keep your child rape books off my Amazon. | ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
On November 11 2010 11:57 Mellotron wrote: You know, it wouldnt hurt my neighbor at all if i took a shit on my lawn every day right in front of him. Its disgusting. But, all id have to do is say hey, its my yard, its natural, and you dont have to watch. I could probably even say its my "right" and its my "freedom of speech". But i dont do it. Why? Because even if it felt GREAT to me to shit on my lawn i know it bothers him. I know what it feels like to be disgusted, even though i (in this fantasy scenario as the lawn shitter himself) am not disgusted by it. I take it upon myself to hide the pieces of myself that upset others. I do this to ensure peace in a world constantly split and constantly inconsistent. I dont shit on my lawn in front of you. I spare you that even though its my "freedom" and there "is no such thing as right and wrong". So keep your child rape books off my Amazon. That's called indecent exposure, and it is a crime. This example is pretty entertaining if not retarded. | ||
|
Seide
United States831 Posts
This thread has it all. | ||
|
hefty
Denmark555 Posts
On November 11 2010 11:39 g50000 wrote: So if I write a book that talks about how to kill the presidentl; possesing both racism and anti-islamic ideologies and that there should be a mass genocide that parallels that of the holocaust, you wouldn't condemn it? You think that people should be able to purchase it? Exactly, that is what I thought. I believe such literature is legal here, and I think it funny that you are so certain we should all oppose to the idea. I support the freedom to publish such a book. On November 11 2010 11:39 g50000 wrote: The secret service sure as hell wouldn't think twice about deleting any evidence of the book and making the author "disappear". Freedom of speech is very important in democratic societies, however, there is an extent when freedom of speech is taken too far, which, in this case it has. Writing a book about breaking the law should in-itself be breaking the law, however, with twisted ideals it isn't - too lazy to make an analogy that is simple-minded enough for you. P.S. once this hits national news, I would be money that the ACLU will be quick to try and defend the author of the book. "Writing a book about breaking the law".. Does this include fiction as well? Because otherwise I could just disguise it all as fiction and publish anyway. The idea that talking/writing about criminality should be punished is stupid to me. And the secret service part is quite laughable. | ||
|
BoX
United States214 Posts
The silver lining, in my opinion, is that feds may be able to use the sales history of this pedo-bible to track these shitbags. | ||
|
hefty
Denmark555 Posts
On November 11 2010 11:43 Romantic wrote: Pedophilia has been linked with brain structures in more ways than one and can easily be found on pubmed. Whether or not these will ever been strongly correlated enough to make decisions in early months of pregnancy is yet to be seen. We can only hope, eh? Correlations do not allow for judgments on causality.. | ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
On November 11 2010 07:48 Manifesto7 wrote: Since they already publish the names, photos, and addresses of convicted sex offenders, just extend that to publish the names and places of people who buy this book. Privacy: you have just ruined it. Reading this book does not make you a pedophile. However, being convicted of pedophilia is a matter of public record, so Melissa's law is at least somewhat defensible. But the court has ruled that the reading or owning the Anarchist Cookbook is not a crime, so neither should reading this book. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On November 11 2010 12:04 MangoTango wrote: Privacy: you have just ruined it. Reading this book does not make you a pedophile. However, being convicted of pedophilia is a matter of public record, so Melissa's law is at least somewhat defensible. But the court has ruled that the reading or owning the Anarchist Cookbook is not a crime, so neither should reading this book. It's up to a pedophile to decide if he or she wants to come out about it. People have the right to know who is a child molester in their neighborhood but I wouldn't support any measure that just increases discrimination against innocent pedophiles. | ||
|
LionsFist
Australia164 Posts
| ||
|
sikyon
Canada1045 Posts
On November 11 2010 11:57 Mellotron wrote: Anyone else find that a person's will to defend freedom of speech is directly proportionate to how it affects them personally? Yeah i could come here trying to be all smart and claim that there "is no such thing as wrong" and "we cant judge others". And id feel GREAT about myself for being oh so smart and wise to grasp and unravel the great mysteries and fallacies of the human mind. But, the minute it was my kid getting fondled or even fondled mentally by some pedophile id be raging. I think youll find that from a distance, everyone likes to play Mr. "Pro Freedom of Speech". They like the idea of themselves as smart and observant. But... you bring the "speech" to their doorstep and suddenly the will to play politically correct diminishes to nothing. The fact that the majority does not live in fear is how the wheels on democracy keep working. That the majority remains rational - informed, educated. As soon as something like that happens to you you are no longer impartial, you are emotional. That is exactly why judges will not preside over cases in which they have a conflict of interest. On November 11 2010 11:57 Mellotron wrote: You know, it wouldnt hurt my neighbor at all if i took a shit on my lawn every day right in front of him. Its disgusting. But, all id have to do is say hey, its my yard, its natural, and you dont have to watch. I could probably even say its my "right" and its my "freedom of speech". But i dont do it. Why? Because even if it felt GREAT to me to shit on my lawn i know it bothers him. I know what it feels like to be disgusted, even though i (in this fantasy scenario as the lawn shitter himself) am not disgusted by it. I take it upon myself to hide the pieces of myself that upset others. I do this to ensure peace in a world constantly split and constantly inconsistent. That's your choice. There are lots of situations when people don't like their neighbors. Get over it. On November 11 2010 11:57 Mellotron wrote: I dont shit on my lawn in front of you. I spare you that even though its my "freedom" and there "is no such thing as right and wrong". So keep your child rape books off my Amazon. Who the hell are you. Are you jeff bezos? Do you own a 51% share of Amazon Stock? No? | ||
|
opsayo
591 Posts
its easy to spout america freedom home of the free when everything is agreeing with you | ||
|
Swwww
Switzerland812 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
Mellotron
United States329 Posts
On November 11 2010 11:59 _Darwin_ wrote: That's called indecent exposure, and it is a crime. This example is pretty entertaining if not retarded. Man I really thought i had a thread ending post there. I really thought i had something that would kill this sucker once and for all. I had humor, i had truth, i insulted and praised both sides of the argument, i had swearing (but not too much), and so much more. I put a lot of heart and soul into that thread breaker. And you killed it. But you forgot that in the eyes of the freedom of speech/there is no such thing as wrong mindset, indecent exposure shouldnt be illegal because according to them there is no thing that can be done that is wrong or can be judged. So now i have to go ahead and make this post to diffuse your shoddy diffusion of my post that i gave a piece of my very own soul to compose. Next time just think for a little bit about what i write so that i dont have to explain what should be obvious and steal the thunder out from under my threadbreaker attempt posts. Please i beg ya. Nah nah im not going down like that. I broke this thread. You arent going to get people to rape kids. And you arent going to get people to not rape kids. There is no amount of citing whatever you learned in college last week that will change that. So, we have to still live in this society amongst others. Without killing each other. So lets agree that sometimes you gotta hide the sick stuff away from the 99 percent of epople who dont want to see it, and are justified in not wanting to see it. You think i give a rats ass if in the grande scheme of the universe that there is in fact "no right and wrong"? That means jack squat to me. It probably should. But, sadly, it does not. Especially when it comes to kids. Sorry man, i dont have the will to be that open minded. Ill admit it. You got me beat. I cant be the smartest and most open minded free speech guy. I have to draw the line at pro child rape books posted on public websites that are regularly visited by 99 percent of humans who find that extremely offensive. Maybe we should all just draw a line in the sand and everyone who thinks its smart to let a society of fools, morons, criminals, and uneducated scum do whatever they want in the name of "freedom of speech" go over to the left. Everyone who thinks that freedom of speech originally was meant to give people a voice against the suppression of the people in what was the previous forms of government rather than a vehicle for future child rape book monopolies can go on the other side. We wont bother you, you dont bother us. Some of us have things we want to get done on this planet before we die that dont involve letting sickos go as far as they possibly can while we defend them using the endless logic loophole that is "freedom of speech". | ||
|
Hanners
United States142 Posts
I would like to read this book. I am curious to know more about the world in which I live. If I were to go out and perform an illegal act of expressed pedophillia, then that is something that I *chose* to do. Myself. And I should be solely held responsible for my actions. To deny me the right to make choices and decisions is to deny yourself the same right. Congratulations, you've just limited your access to the human experience due to fear. You say I can't read this book? I say you can't watch Dexter or any movie that has people performing any sort of illegal action and getting away with it. Your collective knee-jerk, fear-induced stupidity astounds me. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
On November 11 2010 12:09 Gfox wrote: 9mm round for anyone who bought this book and its author. I'd love to live in your society where the act of buying a book is punishable by death. Salmun Rushdie and the satanic verses anyone? | ||
|
Romantic
United States1844 Posts
On November 11 2010 12:02 hefty wrote: Correlations do not allow for judgments on causality.. Blah, blah. It is a good start. Only acting on the genetic\developmental correlations will be able to provide a counterfactual needed to determine causality. | ||
|
Kurt_Russell
Canada147 Posts
Edit: Oh, and it would seem that "The anarchists cookbook" does not contain actual IED (and such) recipes, that those written in the book give faulty and dangerous instructions and was possibly even written by the government to mislead individuals (possibly even to death because of unsafe IED creation procedures) who would be interested in reading and using the content of this literature. | ||
|
Tensai176
Canada2061 Posts
On November 11 2010 12:10 XeliN wrote: I'd love to live in your society where the act of buying a book is punishable by death. Salmun Rushdie and the satanic verses anyone? I was going to say, "You're an idiot," but yours was more clever... | ||
|
Scroobius
Australia9 Posts
On November 11 2010 07:48 Manifesto7 wrote: Since they already publish the names, photos, and addresses of convicted sex offenders, just extend that to publish the names and places of people who buy this book. Agreed.These people are dangerous. At the very least Interpol should keep a record and watch them closley | ||
| ||
