EPT19 people killed at the Love Parade - Page 7
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
polgas
Canada1723 Posts
| ||
|
USn
United States376 Posts
User was banned for this post. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
WOW SO TASTELESS. | ||
|
ultramagnetics
Poland215 Posts
| ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
We have tried to change our harmful ways towards the environment for 50 years +- 20 years, and failed at that. We tried to increase our effeciency so we wouldnt waste so much. That, we failed at, we cant have succes through means of increasing our effeciency, sure it will help but we wont reach the goal. We need to look into the fact that we are 7 billion people and do something about it. | ||
|
Ksyper
Bulgaria665 Posts
On July 27 2010 08:34 exeexe wrote: Lets be harsh here, but not so harsh that i am crazy but harsh in a balanced way. People are destroying the environment, so when 19 people dies its good for the environment, thus it was good. Ofcourse ppl get injuried in the proces too and thats where it is sad. What i am trying to say is that we are almost 7 billion people, just how bad can it be then that 19 people dies? We have tried to change our harmful ways towards the environment for 50 years +- 20 years, and failed at that. We tried to increase our effeciency so we wouldnt waste so much. That, we failed at, we cant have succes through means of increasing our effeciency, sure it will help but we wont reach the goal. We need to look into the fact that we are 7 billion people and do something about it. How about we start by killing you, your family and all your friends? | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On July 27 2010 08:38 Ksyper wrote: How about we start by killing you, your family and all your friends? I propose a global stampede to help counter overpopulation issues. | ||
|
BlackJack
United States10347 Posts
On July 27 2010 08:34 exeexe wrote: Lets be harsh here, but not so harsh that i am crazy but harsh in a balanced way. People are destroying the environment, so when 19 people dies its good for the environment, thus it was good. Ofcourse ppl get injuried in the proces too and thats where it is sad. What i am trying to say is that we are almost 7 billion people, just how bad then, can it be that 19 people dies? We have tried to change our harmful ways towards the environment for 50 years +- 20 years, and failed at that. We tried to increase our effeciency so we wouldnt waste so much. That, we failed at, we cant have succes through means of increasing our effeciency, sure it will help but we wont reach the goal. We need to look into the fact that we are 7 billion people and do something about it. This is such stupid logic. Why should we give 2 craps about the environment? | ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
living in friendly environment > living in hostile environment | ||
|
BlackJack
United States10347 Posts
On July 27 2010 10:02 exeexe wrote: Because living in friendly environment > living in hostile environment So you regard your quality of life over people's actual lives? nice | ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
| ||
|
furymonkey
New Zealand1587 Posts
Edit: Some people were just standing on stairs watching. Death toll has also raised to 20. | ||
| ||
