EPT"GG"
Chemical weapon bomb in Iraq - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
maleorderbride
United States2916 Posts
"GG" | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
 | ||
|
Pacifist
Israel1683 Posts
| ||
|
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
| ||
|
Pob
880 Posts
| ||
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
| ||
|
Amnesty
United States2054 Posts
| ||
|
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
On May 17 2004 21:54 BroOd wrote: Is there some sort of statute of limitations on biochemical warfare that I'm not aware of? The US would hope there is, considering we supported him when he actually had WMD... | ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12237 Posts
On May 17 2004 21:40 TeCh)PsylO wrote: Reading past the headlines tends to help. Know what else helps? Reading instead of skimming. The "shell" you refer to was the mustard gas shell found a couple of weeks ago. This is brand new stuff. | ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12237 Posts
On May 17 2004 21:48 Pob wrote: was made before 1991 , probably just forgotten about or planted If it was forgotten it was still Saddam's responsibility to destroy it. If it was planted... come on... planted? Get real. The smartest time to plant evidence would be right as we arrive to topple Baghdad, or a couple weeks thereafter. There has already been a major scandal regarding the WMDs and a major international backlash. Why would they wait for MONTHS after this backlash to plant something? I swear, there is not enough tinfoil on this earth to satisfy you =( | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
You hardly disproved planting, btw. | ||
|
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
This is brand new stuff. You're right. There are WMD factories in Iraq right now producing WMD. They were also there before we entered Iraq, when the UN inspectors were there. Iraq must have just hidden everything in trucks and trains and moved it all around minutes before we arrived!, as proven by Collin Powells breathtaking UN presentation. Iraq was proabably also making them when the UN inspectors were there in the 90's, and also when we were bombing the crap out of them during Operation Desert Fox(or badger as Bush likes to call it... ) For godsakes, get a clue. | ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12237 Posts
On May 17 2004 23:30 Servolisk wrote: Why didn't Saddam use it if he had it (I'm sure HE wouldn't have a problem using it and taking out some of his people as collateral damage to hit Americans)? You hardly disproved planting, btw. Why don't you ask him yourself? Seriously =[ Don't forget that Saddam wasn't in control of the military after that decapitation strike on his palace. That's when he and his family went into hiding. He probably had to give an executive order to use these. We also disrupted communications among the three main guard units. How did I not disprove planting? Sure it's possible but it's stupid to do it NOW when they could have done it THEN. Seriously, it seems like every time there's even the slightest possibility that some positive news could turn up for the Bush administration and America, you guys jump all over it and claim it's fabricated. Thus my tinfoil statement. | ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12237 Posts
On May 17 2004 23:31 TeCh)PsylO wrote: You're right. There are WMD factories in Iraq right now producing WMD. They were also there before we entered Iraq, when the UN inspectors were there. Iraq must have just hidden everything in trucks and trains and moved it all around minutes before we arrived!, as proven by Collin Powells breathtaking UN presentation. Iraq was proabably also making them when the UN inspectors were there in the 90's, and also when we were bombing the crap out of them during Operation Desert Fox(or badger as Bush likes to call it... ) For godsakes, get a clue. Look. Psylo. Friend. Earlier this month, some trace residue of mustard agent, an older type of chemical weapon, was detected in an artillery shell found in a Baghdad street, a U.S. official said Monday, speaking on condition of anonymity. The shell was believed to be from one of Saddam's old stockpiles and was not regarded as evidence of recent weapons of mass destruction production in Iraq. That is NOT the same thing as the sarin shell found today. The sarin discovery is brand new. They didn't bring the mustard gas shell to light because they didn't think it was a recent agent. This is different. You just can't handle being wrong, can you? | ||
|
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
it seems like every time there's even the slightest possibility that some positive news could turn up for the Bush administration and America, you guys jump all over it and claim it's fabricated. What would it take for you to lose respect for this administration? | ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12237 Posts
On May 17 2004 23:39 TeCh)PsylO wrote: What would it take for you to lose respect for this administration? More like what would it take for you to gain it? | ||
|
baal
10541 Posts
why plant a bomb now after so many time, why didnt they do just when irak fell, they planted a few chemial bombs and then they act surprised... I never understood why didnt they plant forbbiden bombs in irak ._.v | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
| ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12237 Posts
On May 17 2004 23:43 Servolisk wrote: Maybe they couldn't do it then (EDIT: and get away with it).. Or maybe if they did it now, people would say "if the planted it, why didn't they just do it right away", which gives them the same credibility (if succesful) after temporary doubt.. Keep stretching, rubberman! | ||
| ||
