• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:44
CEST 16:44
KST 23:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202538RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 745 users

Philosophy - Page 23

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 Next All
kzn
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States1218 Posts
July 24 2010 03:18 GMT
#441
On July 24 2010 00:44 Scorcher2k wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 12:27 Hidden_MotiveS wrote:
On July 23 2010 12:10 Scorcher2k wrote:
On July 21 2010 17:27 Telcontar wrote:
its a painful thing when you wake up one day and realise you're a nihilist and how empty everything in this universe seems. maybe im just going through a rough patch but i just cant shake off the idea that all of this is nothing.

I quit thinking about things for a while when I did this lol. It did get better for me so I hope it does for you too.

Nihilism is by its very nature sad, but its sort of countered by existentialism. Try reading about this.

I just went on to read Searle and then everything surrounding consciousness. Lots of links to great papers here.
http://consc.net/online/1/all#general


Searle is a bit of an idiot :x
Like a G6
catamorphist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States297 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-24 03:53:41
July 24 2010 03:52 GMT
#442
On July 24 2010 11:15 Hidden_MotiveS wrote:
Lol maji, always an interesting take on things.

I'm still having a hard time believing that a particle would behave differently if it were collided with once, then you went back in time, and it were collided with again. If this is the case then the universe is still deterministic and my explanation was merely a simplification. Everything in my argument still holds.


In a quantum system, the fundamental problem with this idea is that the current observable position and velocity of particles is not sufficient to represent the current quantum state; it's just a consequence of the state. The state itself consists of probability amplitudes for each particle, not positions and velocities. So even if somehow you obtained "perfect information" about the state at a point in time (which isn't possible, anyway) and you were able to revert the whole world back to that state and start again, the result would probably not be the same from your perspective.

Sorry if this is unclear, I might not be explaining it very well, and anyway, it belongs more in a textbook than in a paragraph. I also don't understand it very well myself; I've studied the actual math very little.
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/281144/1/catamorphist/
Maji
Profile Joined June 2010
Australia82 Posts
July 24 2010 04:06 GMT
#443
On July 24 2010 12:52 catamorphist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2010 11:15 Hidden_MotiveS wrote:
Lol maji, always an interesting take on things.

I'm still having a hard time believing that a particle would behave differently if it were collided with once, then you went back in time, and it were collided with again. If this is the case then the universe is still deterministic and my explanation was merely a simplification. Everything in my argument still holds.


In a quantum system, the fundamental problem with this idea is that the current observable position and velocity of particles is not sufficient to represent the current quantum state; it's just a consequence of the state. The state itself consists of probability amplitudes for each particle, not positions and velocities. So even if somehow you obtained "perfect information" about the state at a point in time (which isn't possible, anyway) and you were able to revert the whole world back to that state and start again, the result would probably not be the same from your perspective.

Sorry if this is unclear, I might not be explaining it very well, and anyway, it belongs more in a textbook than in a paragraph. I also don't understand it very well myself; I've studied the actual math very little.


humanitys asumption is the problem you presume physics is the same in all realms but it isnt hence to travel interdimensionally and across the density thresholds you have to be able to adjust your technology based on location, hence when humanity finally realizes that physics is a variable not a constant but that gravity is the only constant then you will unlock the doors which have remained closed all this time.

Life is alll Lessons
killa_robot
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada1884 Posts
July 24 2010 04:17 GMT
#444

What is the point of life ?

What can bring you lasting happiness ?

What are your most important values ?

What is good and what is evil ?

What is Wisdom ?



Point of life is to live life.

Nothing can bring you LASTING happiness, everything will make you angry at some point.

Respect and Truth.

Good is everything I hold dear to myself, values or people, evil is everything that threatens those.

Wisdom is knowledge gained by personal experience.


I think the good and evil question is probably the most interesting one.

kzn
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States1218 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-24 04:56:53
July 24 2010 04:56 GMT
#445
On July 24 2010 13:06 Maji wrote:
humanitys asumption is the problem you presume physics is the same in all realms but it isnt hence to travel interdimensionally and across the density thresholds you have to be able to adjust your technology based on location, hence when humanity finally realizes that physics is a variable not a constant but that gravity is the only constant then you will unlock the doors which have remained closed all this time.


Because gravity isn't a conjecture of physics.

Are you ever going to make an actual argument?
Like a G6
catamorphist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States297 Posts
July 24 2010 04:59 GMT
#446
On July 24 2010 13:06 Maji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2010 12:52 catamorphist wrote:
On July 24 2010 11:15 Hidden_MotiveS wrote:
Lol maji, always an interesting take on things.

I'm still having a hard time believing that a particle would behave differently if it were collided with once, then you went back in time, and it were collided with again. If this is the case then the universe is still deterministic and my explanation was merely a simplification. Everything in my argument still holds.


In a quantum system, the fundamental problem with this idea is that the current observable position and velocity of particles is not sufficient to represent the current quantum state; it's just a consequence of the state. The state itself consists of probability amplitudes for each particle, not positions and velocities. So even if somehow you obtained "perfect information" about the state at a point in time (which isn't possible, anyway) and you were able to revert the whole world back to that state and start again, the result would probably not be the same from your perspective.

Sorry if this is unclear, I might not be explaining it very well, and anyway, it belongs more in a textbook than in a paragraph. I also don't understand it very well myself; I've studied the actual math very little.


humanitys asumption is the problem you presume physics is the same in all realms but it isnt hence to travel interdimensionally and across the density thresholds you have to be able to adjust your technology based on location, hence when humanity finally realizes that physics is a variable not a constant but that gravity is the only constant then you will unlock the doors which have remained closed all this time.



OK, you convinced me.
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/281144/1/catamorphist/
Maji
Profile Joined June 2010
Australia82 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-24 05:36:32
July 24 2010 05:33 GMT
#447
On July 24 2010 13:56 kzn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2010 13:06 Maji wrote:
humanitys asumption is the problem you presume physics is the same in all realms but it isnt hence to travel interdimensionally and across the density thresholds you have to be able to adjust your technology based on location, hence when humanity finally realizes that physics is a variable not a constant but that gravity is the only constant then you will unlock the doors which have remained closed all this time.


Because gravity isn't a conjecture of physics.

Are you ever going to make an actual argument?



Gravity is the begining and the end of all things, all else is a expression create through gravity form through intelligent energy, question is what is designing the form answer is simply consciousness.

Hence the physical laws you follow in physics are simply just ideas. So physics is varied between different realms of exsistance but is created in it construct through what is known to humanity as gravity but gravity is much more than humanity understand it and gravity is the key to entire universe.

User was banned for this post.
Life is alll Lessons
Coagulation
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States9633 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-24 06:56:37
July 24 2010 06:49 GMT
#448
On July 24 2010 14:33 Maji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2010 13:56 kzn wrote:
On July 24 2010 13:06 Maji wrote:
humanitys asumption is the problem you presume physics is the same in all realms but it isnt hence to travel interdimensionally and across the density thresholds you have to be able to adjust your technology based on location, hence when humanity finally realizes that physics is a variable not a constant but that gravity is the only constant then you will unlock the doors which have remained closed all this time.


Because gravity isn't a conjecture of physics.

Are you ever going to make an actual argument?



Gravity is the begining and the end of all things, all else is a expression create through gravity form through intelligent energy, question is what is designing the form answer is simply consciousness.

Hence the physical laws you follow in physics are simply just ideas. So physics is varied between different realms of exsistance but is created in it construct through what is known to humanity as gravity but gravity is much more than humanity understand it and gravity is the key to entire universe.

User was banned for this post.



sorry
H
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
New Zealand6138 Posts
July 24 2010 06:51 GMT
#449
It was less for that post and more about his entire posting history. If you want to protest it, you can PM me instead of posting here. That is to say, don't post here to ask why Maji got banned.
[iHs]HCO | のヮの | pachi & plexa ownz | RIP _
shammythefox
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom286 Posts
July 24 2010 09:33 GMT
#450
On July 23 2010 11:07 kzn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 06:41 shammythefox wrote:
Please go on. I would love to see some guy on the internets prove the pursuits of thousands of years of the world's most intelligent minds futile


You can't know anything via perception except that you have perceived X.

You might be able to prove that, had we been present at the time of the big bang (or whatever) we would have perceived a big bang, but that doesn't get you any closer to proving what actually happened.

Doesn't prove anything futile unless you insist on clinging to beliefs about an objective reality.



A concept itself derived from perception. The idea that one cannot put too much faith in our tools is useful to a certain level, that level being when the tool is only apparent in one scenario, when the tool itself is the very manifestation of reality it ceases to become a perception and becomes the reality. Part of our understanding of gravity derived from galileo was described without the use of observation, simply thought, and a pristine understanding of logic. Now if you want to say that this thought was governed by the laws that rule the universe and these themselves are already skewed by this perception, then the original unperspected notion infact ceases to have meaning.
kzn
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States1218 Posts
July 24 2010 21:17 GMT
#451
On July 24 2010 18:33 shammythefox wrote:
A concept itself derived from perception. The idea that one cannot put too much faith in our tools is useful to a certain level, that level being when the tool is only apparent in one scenario, when the tool itself is the very manifestation of reality it ceases to become a perception and becomes the reality. Part of our understanding of gravity derived from galileo was described without the use of observation, simply thought, and a pristine understanding of logic. Now if you want to say that this thought was governed by the laws that rule the universe and these themselves are already skewed by this perception, then the original unperspected notion infact ceases to have meaning.


Well yes the "original" before perception pretty much doesn't have meaning, as far as I'm concerned, because it is unknowable.
Like a G6
shammythefox
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom286 Posts
July 24 2010 21:39 GMT
#452
On July 25 2010 06:17 kzn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2010 18:33 shammythefox wrote:
A concept itself derived from perception. The idea that one cannot put too much faith in our tools is useful to a certain level, that level being when the tool is only apparent in one scenario, when the tool itself is the very manifestation of reality it ceases to become a perception and becomes the reality. Part of our understanding of gravity derived from galileo was described without the use of observation, simply thought, and a pristine understanding of logic. Now if you want to say that this thought was governed by the laws that rule the universe and these themselves are already skewed by this perception, then the original unperspected notion infact ceases to have meaning.


Well yes the "original" before perception pretty much doesn't have meaning, as far as I'm concerned, because it is unknowable.


What i'm saying is not only does it not have meaning, in the fact that some laws of physics are derived without observation and thus directly from the universe, if perception does indeed skew these laws they must be skewed for the entire universe, and as this is the very object they govern the original was either a) impossible to be skewed or b) ceases to exist
Apolo
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal1259 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-24 22:51:28
July 24 2010 22:43 GMT
#453
On July 17 2010 03:44 Epsilon8 wrote:
Again, you attempted to explain energy as the function of how it works. I.E. kinetic, potential, chemical. Really it is all the same thing doing different things. You did not answer what it is.

Your explanation that science should not be any less more credible even though it has not explained it yet because in the future it will explain it is not a stable ground to be in. It is the same as me saying "Even though you cannot prove God exists he does because you will find out when you die that he is there.".

Other then that I am not trying to provide a definitive explanation for why existence is the way it is, I am merely trying to expose science for not being able to answer the underlying 'deeper' questions upon which it makes its assumptions.


I'll explain again, in another way, so maybe you will understand. There is no such thing in the real world as energy. You can't point and say "Look, here's energy." in the same way you can point to a rock or anything observable. It's a theoretical concept, created by humans. Understand now?

Which deeper questions? Sciences assumptions are tested everyday, and until they fail to represent the real world, they will keep being used.

On July 17 2010 03:44 Epsilon8 wrote:Your explanation that science should not be any less more credible even though it has not explained it yet because in the future it will explain it is not a stable ground to be in. It is the same as me saying "Even though you cannot prove God exists he does because you will find out when you die that he is there.".


No it is not the same. Religion doesn't have any credibility, or past sucesses to have a reputation worth any faith. Science does. All it's theories are constantly tested and put to pressure to see if they hold, and unlike religion, there is more than enough evidence that supports the argument that it is evolving. You seem to be bashing science, because that's the position you want to be, even though the arguments makes no sense.

And you haven't defined reality yet.

Cheers.
treekiller
Profile Joined July 2010
United States236 Posts
July 25 2010 07:51 GMT
#454
One interesting question is the mind-body problem.

Many people hold four beliefs that form an inconsistent tetrad; that is not all can be true, but up to three can be true.

1) The human mind is a spiritual thing
2) The human body is a material thing
3) Mind and body interact
4) Spirit and matter do not interact

Spiritual doesn't necessarily mean God or ghost, etc.; it means not physical or more than physical.

I reject number 1). The physical brain is the mind and there is not need to resort to beliefs in the nonphysical to explain the mind-body interactions.

We could also discuss other philosophical problems, such as theodicity, free will and ethics. I think that would be more interesting than the problems originally suggested. I think these problems have relevance to gaming. For example, if we do not have free will, what is the point of pretending to discuss strategy if our actions are already predetermined?
All good things must come to an end. Therefore, SC2 will last forever
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7684 Posts
July 25 2010 08:07 GMT
#455
What I find most amusing is that the Cult of Science has no knowledge of its own history. They argue as if they have found the final answer when they can't even formulate a decent question.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
ZapRoffo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5544 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-25 08:57:49
July 25 2010 08:57 GMT
#456
On July 25 2010 07:43 Duelist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2010 03:44 Epsilon8 wrote:
Again, you attempted to explain energy as the function of how it works. I.E. kinetic, potential, chemical. Really it is all the same thing doing different things. You did not answer what it is.

Your explanation that science should not be any less more credible even though it has not explained it yet because in the future it will explain it is not a stable ground to be in. It is the same as me saying "Even though you cannot prove God exists he does because you will find out when you die that he is there.".

Other then that I am not trying to provide a definitive explanation for why existence is the way it is, I am merely trying to expose science for not being able to answer the underlying 'deeper' questions upon which it makes its assumptions.


I'll explain again, in another way, so maybe you will understand. There is no such thing in the real world as energy. You can't point and say "Look, here's energy." in the same way you can point to a rock or anything observable. It's a theoretical concept, created by humans. Understand now?

Which deeper questions? Sciences assumptions are tested everyday, and until they fail to represent the real world, they will keep being used.

Show nested quote +
On July 17 2010 03:44 Epsilon8 wrote:Your explanation that science should not be any less more credible even though it has not explained it yet because in the future it will explain it is not a stable ground to be in. It is the same as me saying "Even though you cannot prove God exists he does because you will find out when you die that he is there.".


No it is not the same. Religion doesn't have any credibility, or past sucesses to have a reputation worth any faith. Science does. All it's theories are constantly tested and put to pressure to see if they hold, and unlike religion, there is more than enough evidence that supports the argument that it is evolving. You seem to be bashing science, because that's the position you want to be, even though the arguments makes no sense.

And you haven't defined reality yet.

Cheers.


There are enough puzzles that exist in modern science that I believe it's quite valid to say that every aspect of the universe being explainable eventually is a question and not something you can just assume. It's a belief, the same as a belief that there's something outside the natural world and things are not explainable.

We don't know that the supernatural doesn't have past successes, because it's outside what is knowable to us. Same as we don't know if science will always have future successes. The pure scientific world view is built on finding accurate predictions which will be true 100% of the time forever. That is faith, same as the faith leap to believe in something supernatural.

Treating it like a quantum uncertainty/wave-particle duality, that's my stance still. That's our precedent for unobservable states that do have defined possibilities.
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion man
Win.win
Profile Joined March 2010
United States230 Posts
July 25 2010 11:43 GMT
#457
On July 25 2010 17:07 Jerubaal wrote:
What I find most amusing is that the Cult of Science has no knowledge of its own history. They argue as if they have found the final answer when they can't even formulate a decent question.

oh boy. go on then, what's the cult of science?
SC2 Team Inflow: http://inflowgaming.net/
Apolo
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal1259 Posts
July 25 2010 12:27 GMT
#458
On July 25 2010 17:57 ZapRoffo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2010 07:43 Duelist wrote:
On July 17 2010 03:44 Epsilon8 wrote:
Again, you attempted to explain energy as the function of how it works. I.E. kinetic, potential, chemical. Really it is all the same thing doing different things. You did not answer what it is.

Your explanation that science should not be any less more credible even though it has not explained it yet because in the future it will explain it is not a stable ground to be in. It is the same as me saying "Even though you cannot prove God exists he does because you will find out when you die that he is there.".

Other then that I am not trying to provide a definitive explanation for why existence is the way it is, I am merely trying to expose science for not being able to answer the underlying 'deeper' questions upon which it makes its assumptions.


I'll explain again, in another way, so maybe you will understand. There is no such thing in the real world as energy. You can't point and say "Look, here's energy." in the same way you can point to a rock or anything observable. It's a theoretical concept, created by humans. Understand now?

Which deeper questions? Sciences assumptions are tested everyday, and until they fail to represent the real world, they will keep being used.

On July 17 2010 03:44 Epsilon8 wrote:Your explanation that science should not be any less more credible even though it has not explained it yet because in the future it will explain it is not a stable ground to be in. It is the same as me saying "Even though you cannot prove God exists he does because you will find out when you die that he is there.".


No it is not the same. Religion doesn't have any credibility, or past sucesses to have a reputation worth any faith. Science does. All it's theories are constantly tested and put to pressure to see if they hold, and unlike religion, there is more than enough evidence that supports the argument that it is evolving. You seem to be bashing science, because that's the position you want to be, even though the arguments makes no sense.

And you haven't defined reality yet.

Cheers.


There are enough puzzles that exist in modern science that I believe it's quite valid to say that every aspect of the universe being explainable eventually is a question and not something you can just assume. It's a belief, the same as a belief that there's something outside the natural world and things are not explainable.


I didn't assume. I said science, unlike other beliefs, have shown it evolves with time, and is directly tied with reality since it does accurate predictions on it. It's a belief, but a special one. Beliving in unicorns and that when you drop an apple it will go to the ground, is not the same.

On July 25 2010 17:57 ZapRoffo wrote:We don't know that the supernatural doesn't have past successes, because it's outside what is knowable to us. Same as we don't know if science will always have future successes. The pure scientific world view is built on finding accurate predictions which will be true 100% of the time forever. That is faith, same as the faith leap to believe in something supernatural.



Well that depends. What do you mean by supernatural?

And i don't think the faith leap is the same, as i argued above.
treekiller
Profile Joined July 2010
United States236 Posts
July 25 2010 19:50 GMT
#459
Religions have evolved as well, though they will not admit it. Religions are not static; they add beliefs based on the culture around them and may even respond to scientific discovery (such as Galileo and the Catholic church). Evolution doesn't mean "progressively getting better", it means "becoming more adapted to the environment". For example, religious beliefs that discourage rational thought can be said to be more evolved, as such beliefs are more likely to lead to the preservation of the religion as a whole. Many atheists have this intelligent design view of religion; that all religion was created in a top-down manner by some mysterious cabal to control humanity. While individuals have certainly used religion for there own ends, there are larger evolutionary forces at work outside the control of any individual or group (or God). This can also explain the similarity of religions that had no previous contacts. Properties will emerge as they are naturally selected. Beliefs that are not falsifiable, separation from outsiders, concentration in a clerical elite, etc. would tend to naturally come about.
It it true that both science and religion face uncertainty. Were they diverge is science seeks to find methods to quantify this uncertainty, make assumptions as simple and as self-apparent as possible when using deductive reasoning and to have a system for replication and minimizing errors when using inductive reasoning. So called "leap of faith" often denies and attempts to side-step this uncertainty. Both science and religion will hold beliefs of which no one can be certain. That is not where they converge; that is where they diverge.
All good things must come to an end. Therefore, SC2 will last forever
Hidden_MotiveS
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Canada2562 Posts
July 25 2010 21:51 GMT
#460
On July 24 2010 14:33 Maji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2010 13:56 kzn wrote:
On July 24 2010 13:06 Maji wrote:
humanitys asumption is the problem you presume physics is the same in all realms but it isnt hence to travel interdimensionally and across the density thresholds you have to be able to adjust your technology based on location, hence when humanity finally realizes that physics is a variable not a constant but that gravity is the only constant then you will unlock the doors which have remained closed all this time.


Because gravity isn't a conjecture of physics.

Are you ever going to make an actual argument?



Gravity is the begining and the end of all things, all else is a expression create through gravity form through intelligent energy, question is what is designing the form answer is simply consciousness.

Hence the physical laws you follow in physics are simply just ideas. So physics is varied between different realms of exsistance but is created in it construct through what is known to humanity as gravity but gravity is much more than humanity understand it and gravity is the key to entire universe.

User was banned for this post.

He's back isn't he? -_-
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11745
ComeBackTV 2637
TaKeTV 619
Hui .578
3DClanTV 396
Rex262
EnkiAlexander 244
mcanning194
CranKy Ducklings182
Reynor153
UpATreeSC123
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11745
Hui .578
Rex 262
mcanning 194
Reynor 153
UpATreeSC 123
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4146
Barracks 1880
Flash 1807
Jaedong 1449
BeSt 1421
EffOrt 1071
Mini 557
Stork 494
ggaemo 355
Snow 333
[ Show more ]
GuemChi 262
Soma 257
Soulkey 240
ZerO 239
ToSsGirL 185
Rush 118
Hyun 105
TY 49
soO 49
Sacsri 37
scan(afreeca) 23
Terrorterran 14
Movie 12
Yoon 12
ivOry 9
Bale 8
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN434
420jenkins325
XcaliburYe264
Counter-Strike
sgares690
flusha129
edward65
Super Smash Bros
Westballz37
Other Games
singsing2040
hiko1280
B2W.Neo923
crisheroes449
Fuzer 173
ArmadaUGS108
KnowMe56
QueenE50
ZerO(Twitch)20
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH266
• Adnapsc2 3
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1762
• WagamamaTV576
League of Legends
• Nemesis4248
• TFBlade790
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 16m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.