• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:56
CEST 15:56
KST 22:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!7Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)70Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format16[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!18
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" [D] Wireframe Casting Removed
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
HORROR STARCRAFT MOVIE BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Famous was FlaSh before his Debut? BW General Discussion screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Role of Gaming on Mental Hea…
TrAiDoS
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3048 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 766

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 764 765 766 767 768 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 17:25:19
September 23 2016 17:23 GMT
#15301
Thats a constructor which creates an instance of 'class' and initializes 'variable' with whatever value it was passed in the constructor call.

rereading im not sure what your qeustion is, but if you're wondering, that will compile and work correctly. In fact, its a common style.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 17:53:26
September 23 2016 17:25 GMT
#15302
On September 24 2016 02:21 travis wrote:
What happens if my class has a variable:

class {

int variable;

//and then the constructor takes a parameter with the same variable name and does this:

class(int variable){

this.variable = variable;


It sets the field in the class to value of the parameter passed to the method. You're calling this.variable to specify that you want the variable in a different scope than the method. The variable without this declaration is assumed to be in the method scope.

** I'll try to go a bit deeper and explain this better:

public class Box {

private int id;
private String name;

private static int boxId;

static {
boxId = 0;
}

public Box(String name) {
id = Box.getBoxId();
this.name = name;
}

public static int getBoxId() {
int ret = Box.boxId;
boxId++;
return ret;
}

public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
}


So given the previous bit of code, I have a class with a couple fields. In the constructor for my box object, I have a variable called id. There is not an id variable in the scope of the constructor so its assumed that I am referencing the id field of the object. In the setId method you'll notice that I have a parameter called id so I call this.id to specify to the compiler that I want the id variable in this objects scope instead of the method.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 23 2016 17:34 GMT
#15303
I guess my question was kind of like

when I do this.variable = variable;

how does it know that I am talking about the parameter that was passed, or if I was talking about the uninitialized variable.

I guess the answer is, "it just does" ?

(so mainly I was making sure this does in fact work)
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18381 Posts
September 23 2016 17:41 GMT
#15304
On September 24 2016 02:34 travis wrote:
I guess my question was kind of like

when I do this.variable = variable;

how does it know that I am talking about the parameter that was passed, or if I was talking about the uninitialized variable.

I guess the answer is, "it just does" ?

(so mainly I was making sure this does in fact work)

It's not "it just does". It's about scope, as the answer explained. If you don't understand scopes, it's something you have to read up on. It's a very important part of almost all programming languages.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 23 2016 17:48 GMT
#15305
ok, I didn't answer the question in a way that really gets to the root of what I am wondering about, since I used the this keyword


I understand scope. I don't think my question is about scope

if this was my program

public class myclass {

int number = 7;
int number2;

myclass(int number){

this.number2 = number;

}


then what happens
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
September 23 2016 17:52 GMT
#15306
I edited my previous post with a better explanation of scope if that helps.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 17:57:37
September 23 2016 17:54 GMT
#15307
On September 24 2016 02:34 travis wrote:
I guess my question was kind of like

when I do this.variable = variable;

how does it know that I am talking about the parameter that was passed, or if I was talking about the uninitialized variable.

I guess the answer is, "it just does" ?

(so mainly I was making sure this does in fact work)

The field "variable" is in object scope, the constructor parameter "variable" is in method scope. Relative to each other, the field is in the outer scope and the parameter is in the inner scope (think Matryoshka doll). Variables with the same name in an inner scope "hide" or "shadow" variables in outer scopes. So whenever you write just "variable", you will use the one closest to your current scope. That's the parameter if you're inside the constructor. If you write "this.variable", it will always look for a variable at object scope. This allows you to access the otherwise hidden field.

Remember that part recently where we couldn't find the reason for the null reference exception and then it turned out you just had to delete the type declaration "ArrayList<FoundTerm>"? That was exactly because with the type in front of the variable name you were declaring a new variable that hid one with the same name at object scope that you actually wanted to use instead.

I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

EDIT: I wrote "class scope" before when I think it should actually be "object scope". Class scope should be static stuff only, while object scope is variables that are unique to each instance of a class.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18381 Posts
September 23 2016 18:01 GMT
#15308
On September 24 2016 02:48 travis wrote:
ok, I didn't answer the question in a way that really gets to the root of what I am wondering about, since I used the this keyword


I understand scope. I don't think my question is about scope

if this was my program

public class myclass {

int number = 7;
int number2;

myclass(int number){

this.number2 = number;

}


then what happens


You get scolded for using horrid syntax, and told to use proper builder patterns instead. But it's about the order of variable assignment. It works as you'd expect. Upon calling the constructor, the first act is to call the super constructor. If you don't do this explicitly, it is done implicitly. This creates the object you are constructing, and initializes your global variables. After that it runs your constructor, and changes the value of variable "number2" to the parameter you passed.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 23 2016 18:03 GMT
#15309
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17797 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 19:52:27
September 23 2016 19:51 GMT
#15310
On September 24 2016 03:03 travis wrote:
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?


A common mistake I see people make (example is from PHP):


$i = 7;

foreach ($somevar as $i) {
// do stuff
// $i declared before loop is overriden with each iteration
}

// $i is now whatever the last element of the iterable $somevar was


Also, I don't think you should be declaring classes within classes...
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 19:59:37
September 23 2016 19:59 GMT
#15311
On September 24 2016 03:03 travis wrote:
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?


I would say it depends on the language? I wouldn't say "more local" though, I think "closest in scope" is clearer, but maybe "more local" is easier to understand.

See if these make sense to you.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2804880/in-c-what-is-the-scope-resolution-order-of-precedence-for-shadowed-variab

Behind the scenes, a compiler (preprocessor? one of those steps) (usually?) mangles the name of (all?) variables so it doesn't actually see your variable name. They then use the language rules to deduce which ones to call.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22067562/how-c-handles-the-same-variable-name-along-different-scopes
There is no one like you in the universe.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18381 Posts
September 23 2016 22:23 GMT
#15312
On September 24 2016 04:51 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 03:03 travis wrote:
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?


A common mistake I see people make (example is from PHP):


$i = 7;

foreach ($somevar as $i) {
// do stuff
// $i declared before loop is overriden with each iteration
}

// $i is now whatever the last element of the iterable $somevar was


Also, I don't think you should be declaring classes within classes...

Not necessarily wrong to declare nested classes. I agree that it's fairly advanced, though, and as a beginner you are better off not doing that.
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 23:09:09
September 23 2016 23:07 GMT
#15313
On September 24 2016 02:54 spinesheath wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

Although I am not a big fan of naming parameters the same as fields either, it must be noted that todays IDE's are more than capable of detecting these kinds of bugs and generating a warning. I know for a fact that Eclipse will warn you if you assign a parameter to itself.
Birdie
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
New Zealand4438 Posts
September 23 2016 23:08 GMT
#15314
On September 24 2016 08:07 RoomOfMush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 02:54 spinesheath wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

Although I am not a big fan of naming parameters equal to fields either, it must be noted that todays IDE's are more than capable of detecting these kinds of bugs and generating a warning. I know for a fact that Eclipse will warn you if you assign a parameter to itself.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the issue is more the readability of the code, not the compilability. If it's not immediately clear which of two variables is being referenced, then time is wasted on the main work of coding (which is reading).
Red classic | A butterfly dreamed he was Zhuangzi | 4.5k, heading to 5k as support!
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 23:11:51
September 23 2016 23:10 GMT
#15315
On September 24 2016 08:08 Birdie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 08:07 RoomOfMush wrote:
On September 24 2016 02:54 spinesheath wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

Although I am not a big fan of naming parameters equal to fields either, it must be noted that todays IDE's are more than capable of detecting these kinds of bugs and generating a warning. I know for a fact that Eclipse will warn you if you assign a parameter to itself.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the issue is more the readability of the code, not the compilability. If it's not immediately clear which of two variables is being referenced, then time is wasted on the main work of coding (which is reading).

Thats a matter of personal taste, but spinesheath was explicitly talking about "hard to spot errors" and I assume he ment missing the "this" operator and assigning a parameter to itself.

But todays IDE's also have something for your particular problem: Syntax highlighting. Just tell your IDE to highlight fields in a different color to parameters and it will become quite obvious which one is being used.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
September 24 2016 08:03 GMT
#15316
You can just as well read from or write to a variable in inner scope thinking you're working with a field. That doesn't have to involve any self assignment. Obviously IDEs can show a warning for that too, but if you use shadowing in your constructors regularly, then all your constructors will be littered with these warnings. So I suppose that most people who do that have the warning disabled.

Syntax highlighting is not part of your codebase. So if you ever work with others, you better not rely on that.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18381 Posts
September 24 2016 08:38 GMT
#15317
On September 24 2016 17:03 spinesheath wrote:
You can just as well read from or write to a variable in inner scope thinking you're working with a field. That doesn't have to involve any self assignment. Obviously IDEs can show a warning for that too, but if you use shadowing in your constructors regularly, then all your constructors will be littered with these warnings. So I suppose that most people who do that have the warning disabled.

Syntax highlighting is not part of your codebase. So if you ever work with others, you better not rely on that.

Huh? That's not when it shows a warning.


int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) {
this.bar = bar; //fine, no warning
bar = bar; //warning (assigning bar to itself)
this.fizz = fizz; //warning (fizz is only in the outer scope, thus self assignment again.)
}
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
September 24 2016 09:03 GMT
#15318

int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) { // this is where it could show a warning that bar is shadowing this.bar

int fizz; // this is where it could show a warning that fizz is shadowing this.fizz

// ... enough code to make you forget the line above ...

fizz = 5; // here you could mean to assign to this.fizz, introducing a bug

// and if we have some slightly more complex code with say loops, you might not even get a
// "value assigned to variable is never used" warning
}

If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18381 Posts
September 24 2016 09:22 GMT
#15319
On September 24 2016 18:03 spinesheath wrote:

int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) { // this is where it could show a warning that bar is shadowing this.bar

int fizz; // this is where it could show a warning that fizz is shadowing this.fizz

// ... enough code to make you forget the line above ...

fizz = 5; // here you could mean to assign to this.fizz, introducing a bug

// and if we have some slightly more complex code with say loops, you might not even get a
// "value assigned to variable is never used" warning
}


Yeah, ok. That's pretty bad. Anybody using shadowing like that is asking for it, though

I mean, I'm not a fan of shadowing in general and never use it, except in the constructor to initialize fields. And that goes at the bottom of the constructor, so any operations you do before just setting the field aren't affected b the potential bugs you describe.
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
September 24 2016 10:55 GMT
#15320
On September 24 2016 18:03 spinesheath wrote:

int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) { // this is where it could show a warning that bar is shadowing this.bar

int fizz; // this is where it could show a warning that fizz is shadowing this.fizz

// ... enough code to make you forget the line above ...

fizz = 5; // here you could mean to assign to this.fizz, introducing a bug

// and if we have some slightly more complex code with say loops, you might not even get a
// "value assigned to variable is never used" warning
}


One reason why I like the explicit self in python.


def method(self, bar):
... code here ...
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Prev 1 764 765 766 767 768 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
12:05
Summer Cup Group B
WardiTV777
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech88
SHIN 64
RushiSC 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7044
Shuttle 2666
Bisu 2358
Jaedong 1223
Soma 605
Light 436
Hyuk 360
firebathero 333
Larva 281
Mini 280
[ Show more ]
Stork 278
Soulkey 234
Snow 225
actioN 192
ggaemo 160
hero 144
Hyun 126
Rush 117
Dewaltoss 112
Mong 106
Pusan 81
Sharp 65
soO 43
ToSsGirL 41
Free 40
Killer 38
JYJ 37
910 30
HiyA 29
sorry 27
Movie 20
Hm[arnc] 18
Bale 17
Sacsri 15
Sexy 15
GoRush 14
IntoTheRainbow 14
Barracks 13
zelot 11
Noble 10
Terrorterran 10
Rock 9
Icarus 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Dota 2
qojqva1369
Dendi1292
syndereN398
XaKoH 175
XcaliburYe170
League of Legends
KnowMe42
Counter-Strike
fl0m2861
byalli372
Other Games
FrodaN3825
singsing2559
B2W.Neo897
hiko746
Lowko524
uThermal501
crisheroes291
DeMusliM257
Harstem247
OGKoka 236
Hui .146
Liquid`LucifroN113
Liquid`VortiX85
ArmadaUGS58
Livibee50
CosmosSc2 39
Trikslyr26
Chillindude6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1106
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 68
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1917
• TFBlade892
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
10h 4m
The PondCast
20h 4m
Kung Fu Cup
21h 4m
OSC
1d 10h
CrankTV Team League
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Clem vs ByuN
Serral vs SHIN
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs Solar
Rogue vs Lambo
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.