• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:09
CEST 18:09
KST 01:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver4[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down0StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon98Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?178Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Remastered crash fix suggestions Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8794 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 766

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 764 765 766 767 768 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 17:25:19
September 23 2016 17:23 GMT
#15301
Thats a constructor which creates an instance of 'class' and initializes 'variable' with whatever value it was passed in the constructor call.

rereading im not sure what your qeustion is, but if you're wondering, that will compile and work correctly. In fact, its a common style.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 17:53:26
September 23 2016 17:25 GMT
#15302
On September 24 2016 02:21 travis wrote:
What happens if my class has a variable:

class {

int variable;

//and then the constructor takes a parameter with the same variable name and does this:

class(int variable){

this.variable = variable;


It sets the field in the class to value of the parameter passed to the method. You're calling this.variable to specify that you want the variable in a different scope than the method. The variable without this declaration is assumed to be in the method scope.

** I'll try to go a bit deeper and explain this better:

public class Box {

private int id;
private String name;

private static int boxId;

static {
boxId = 0;
}

public Box(String name) {
id = Box.getBoxId();
this.name = name;
}

public static int getBoxId() {
int ret = Box.boxId;
boxId++;
return ret;
}

public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
}


So given the previous bit of code, I have a class with a couple fields. In the constructor for my box object, I have a variable called id. There is not an id variable in the scope of the constructor so its assumed that I am referencing the id field of the object. In the setId method you'll notice that I have a parameter called id so I call this.id to specify to the compiler that I want the id variable in this objects scope instead of the method.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 23 2016 17:34 GMT
#15303
I guess my question was kind of like

when I do this.variable = variable;

how does it know that I am talking about the parameter that was passed, or if I was talking about the uninitialized variable.

I guess the answer is, "it just does" ?

(so mainly I was making sure this does in fact work)
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
September 23 2016 17:41 GMT
#15304
On September 24 2016 02:34 travis wrote:
I guess my question was kind of like

when I do this.variable = variable;

how does it know that I am talking about the parameter that was passed, or if I was talking about the uninitialized variable.

I guess the answer is, "it just does" ?

(so mainly I was making sure this does in fact work)

It's not "it just does". It's about scope, as the answer explained. If you don't understand scopes, it's something you have to read up on. It's a very important part of almost all programming languages.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 23 2016 17:48 GMT
#15305
ok, I didn't answer the question in a way that really gets to the root of what I am wondering about, since I used the this keyword


I understand scope. I don't think my question is about scope

if this was my program

public class myclass {

int number = 7;
int number2;

myclass(int number){

this.number2 = number;

}


then what happens
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
September 23 2016 17:52 GMT
#15306
I edited my previous post with a better explanation of scope if that helps.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 17:57:37
September 23 2016 17:54 GMT
#15307
On September 24 2016 02:34 travis wrote:
I guess my question was kind of like

when I do this.variable = variable;

how does it know that I am talking about the parameter that was passed, or if I was talking about the uninitialized variable.

I guess the answer is, "it just does" ?

(so mainly I was making sure this does in fact work)

The field "variable" is in object scope, the constructor parameter "variable" is in method scope. Relative to each other, the field is in the outer scope and the parameter is in the inner scope (think Matryoshka doll). Variables with the same name in an inner scope "hide" or "shadow" variables in outer scopes. So whenever you write just "variable", you will use the one closest to your current scope. That's the parameter if you're inside the constructor. If you write "this.variable", it will always look for a variable at object scope. This allows you to access the otherwise hidden field.

Remember that part recently where we couldn't find the reason for the null reference exception and then it turned out you just had to delete the type declaration "ArrayList<FoundTerm>"? That was exactly because with the type in front of the variable name you were declaring a new variable that hid one with the same name at object scope that you actually wanted to use instead.

I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

EDIT: I wrote "class scope" before when I think it should actually be "object scope". Class scope should be static stuff only, while object scope is variables that are unique to each instance of a class.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
September 23 2016 18:01 GMT
#15308
On September 24 2016 02:48 travis wrote:
ok, I didn't answer the question in a way that really gets to the root of what I am wondering about, since I used the this keyword


I understand scope. I don't think my question is about scope

if this was my program

public class myclass {

int number = 7;
int number2;

myclass(int number){

this.number2 = number;

}


then what happens


You get scolded for using horrid syntax, and told to use proper builder patterns instead. But it's about the order of variable assignment. It works as you'd expect. Upon calling the constructor, the first act is to call the super constructor. If you don't do this explicitly, it is done implicitly. This creates the object you are constructing, and initializes your global variables. After that it runs your constructor, and changes the value of variable "number2" to the parameter you passed.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 23 2016 18:03 GMT
#15309
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17843 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 19:52:27
September 23 2016 19:51 GMT
#15310
On September 24 2016 03:03 travis wrote:
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?


A common mistake I see people make (example is from PHP):


$i = 7;

foreach ($somevar as $i) {
// do stuff
// $i declared before loop is overriden with each iteration
}

// $i is now whatever the last element of the iterable $somevar was


Also, I don't think you should be declaring classes within classes...
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 19:59:37
September 23 2016 19:59 GMT
#15311
On September 24 2016 03:03 travis wrote:
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?


I would say it depends on the language? I wouldn't say "more local" though, I think "closest in scope" is clearer, but maybe "more local" is easier to understand.

See if these make sense to you.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2804880/in-c-what-is-the-scope-resolution-order-of-precedence-for-shadowed-variab

Behind the scenes, a compiler (preprocessor? one of those steps) (usually?) mangles the name of (all?) variables so it doesn't actually see your variable name. They then use the language rules to deduce which ones to call.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22067562/how-c-handles-the-same-variable-name-along-different-scopes
There is no one like you in the universe.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
September 23 2016 22:23 GMT
#15312
On September 24 2016 04:51 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 03:03 travis wrote:
Okay thanks all, so I guess it is a scope issue

and that the lesson is that when variables have the same name, the more local variable takes precedence?


A common mistake I see people make (example is from PHP):


$i = 7;

foreach ($somevar as $i) {
// do stuff
// $i declared before loop is overriden with each iteration
}

// $i is now whatever the last element of the iterable $somevar was


Also, I don't think you should be declaring classes within classes...

Not necessarily wrong to declare nested classes. I agree that it's fairly advanced, though, and as a beginner you are better off not doing that.
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 23:09:09
September 23 2016 23:07 GMT
#15313
On September 24 2016 02:54 spinesheath wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

Although I am not a big fan of naming parameters the same as fields either, it must be noted that todays IDE's are more than capable of detecting these kinds of bugs and generating a warning. I know for a fact that Eclipse will warn you if you assign a parameter to itself.
Birdie
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
New Zealand4438 Posts
September 23 2016 23:08 GMT
#15314
On September 24 2016 08:07 RoomOfMush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 02:54 spinesheath wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

Although I am not a big fan of naming parameters equal to fields either, it must be noted that todays IDE's are more than capable of detecting these kinds of bugs and generating a warning. I know for a fact that Eclipse will warn you if you assign a parameter to itself.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the issue is more the readability of the code, not the compilability. If it's not immediately clear which of two variables is being referenced, then time is wasted on the main work of coding (which is reading).
Red classic | A butterfly dreamed he was Zhuangzi | 4.5k, heading to 5k as support!
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-23 23:11:51
September 23 2016 23:10 GMT
#15315
On September 24 2016 08:08 Birdie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 08:07 RoomOfMush wrote:
On September 24 2016 02:54 spinesheath wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using hiding like that in constructors because it can introduce hard to spot errors. In some languages it is common practice to prefix variables at object scope, for example with an "m" (often in C++) or an underscore (C#). That way you can still use the plain name for stuff at the method scope, most commonly in the constructor.

Although I am not a big fan of naming parameters equal to fields either, it must be noted that todays IDE's are more than capable of detecting these kinds of bugs and generating a warning. I know for a fact that Eclipse will warn you if you assign a parameter to itself.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the issue is more the readability of the code, not the compilability. If it's not immediately clear which of two variables is being referenced, then time is wasted on the main work of coding (which is reading).

Thats a matter of personal taste, but spinesheath was explicitly talking about "hard to spot errors" and I assume he ment missing the "this" operator and assigning a parameter to itself.

But todays IDE's also have something for your particular problem: Syntax highlighting. Just tell your IDE to highlight fields in a different color to parameters and it will become quite obvious which one is being used.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
September 24 2016 08:03 GMT
#15316
You can just as well read from or write to a variable in inner scope thinking you're working with a field. That doesn't have to involve any self assignment. Obviously IDEs can show a warning for that too, but if you use shadowing in your constructors regularly, then all your constructors will be littered with these warnings. So I suppose that most people who do that have the warning disabled.

Syntax highlighting is not part of your codebase. So if you ever work with others, you better not rely on that.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
September 24 2016 08:38 GMT
#15317
On September 24 2016 17:03 spinesheath wrote:
You can just as well read from or write to a variable in inner scope thinking you're working with a field. That doesn't have to involve any self assignment. Obviously IDEs can show a warning for that too, but if you use shadowing in your constructors regularly, then all your constructors will be littered with these warnings. So I suppose that most people who do that have the warning disabled.

Syntax highlighting is not part of your codebase. So if you ever work with others, you better not rely on that.

Huh? That's not when it shows a warning.


int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) {
this.bar = bar; //fine, no warning
bar = bar; //warning (assigning bar to itself)
this.fizz = fizz; //warning (fizz is only in the outer scope, thus self assignment again.)
}
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
September 24 2016 09:03 GMT
#15318

int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) { // this is where it could show a warning that bar is shadowing this.bar

int fizz; // this is where it could show a warning that fizz is shadowing this.fizz

// ... enough code to make you forget the line above ...

fizz = 5; // here you could mean to assign to this.fizz, introducing a bug

// and if we have some slightly more complex code with say loops, you might not even get a
// "value assigned to variable is never used" warning
}

If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
September 24 2016 09:22 GMT
#15319
On September 24 2016 18:03 spinesheath wrote:

int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) { // this is where it could show a warning that bar is shadowing this.bar

int fizz; // this is where it could show a warning that fizz is shadowing this.fizz

// ... enough code to make you forget the line above ...

fizz = 5; // here you could mean to assign to this.fizz, introducing a bug

// and if we have some slightly more complex code with say loops, you might not even get a
// "value assigned to variable is never used" warning
}


Yeah, ok. That's pretty bad. Anybody using shadowing like that is asking for it, though

I mean, I'm not a fan of shadowing in general and never use it, except in the constructor to initialize fields. And that goes at the bottom of the constructor, so any operations you do before just setting the field aren't affected b the potential bugs you describe.
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
September 24 2016 10:55 GMT
#15320
On September 24 2016 18:03 spinesheath wrote:

int fizz, bar;

public void foo(int bar) { // this is where it could show a warning that bar is shadowing this.bar

int fizz; // this is where it could show a warning that fizz is shadowing this.fizz

// ... enough code to make you forget the line above ...

fizz = 5; // here you could mean to assign to this.fizz, introducing a bug

// and if we have some slightly more complex code with say loops, you might not even get a
// "value assigned to variable is never used" warning
}


One reason why I like the explicit self in python.


def method(self, bar):
... code here ...
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Prev 1 764 765 766 767 768 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 51m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech143
BRAT_OK 66
SHIN 53
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 26519
Bisu 2308
Jaedong 2016
Soulkey 841
BeSt 449
Mini 395
Soma 312
Horang2 304
Rush 264
actioN 251
[ Show more ]
Stork 230
Larva 226
ggaemo 183
firebathero 137
hero 100
Dewaltoss 87
Zeus 65
Barracks 64
Shine 61
soO 44
Killer 40
HiyA 32
sSak 28
PianO 27
Terrorterran 24
ToSsGirL 24
sorry 19
Sexy 18
Trap 17
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
scan(afreeca) 13
Noble 11
Sacsri 4
Dota 2
syndereN681
420jenkins402
Counter-Strike
fl0m800
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King73
Other Games
Grubby10239
singsing2350
Liquid`RaSZi1173
hiko1020
Beastyqt539
FrodaN452
ceh9374
DeMusliM167
Liquid`VortiX132
ArmadaUGS112
QueenE46
XaKoH 46
TKL 45
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1038
WardiTV103
BasetradeTV52
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 54
• mYiSmile144
• Hinosc 17
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV842
League of Legends
• Nemesis2667
• TFBlade904
Other Games
• Shiphtur95
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
7h 51m
The PondCast
17h 51m
Kung Fu Cup
18h 51m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
KCM Race Survival
1d 17h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 18h
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-14
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.