|
On August 28 2011 08:24 cellblock wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 07:50 zimz wrote: if cocaine and crystal meth ever become legal, then the cartels have won. The politicans need to swallow their pride and legalize drugs. But you think its better that thousands of people die every year?
People will die nevertheless. Cartels will be killing those who are in their territory and those who are selling stuff or who are in debts.
|
On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas.
Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try.
|
On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap.
|
On August 28 2011 09:17 zimz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap.
Too much Starcraft there kiddo.
|
On August 28 2011 09:45 Elegy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 09:17 zimz wrote:On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap. Too much Starcraft there kiddo. Nice well thought out input that talks about the thread topic.
|
On August 28 2011 09:45 Elegy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 09:17 zimz wrote:On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap. Too much Starcraft there kiddo.
He has a point though. But it's all about money in this case, which US really don't have to spend for another war.
|
On August 28 2011 09:53 zimz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 09:45 Elegy wrote:On August 28 2011 09:17 zimz wrote:On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap. Too much Starcraft there kiddo. Nice well thought out input that talks about the thread topic.
I want you to think about a few things.
Go look at how big Mexico is.
Go look at how a great deal of Mexico is poor and underdeveloped.
Go look at how corrupt and inefficient the existing government institutions and infrastructure is.
Think about how many hundreds of thousands of soldiers it would take to occupy that country permanently. And how much money that would cost. Then you should consider how pissed off the American public (and world) would be that a war was being fought to annex a corrupt, drug-ridden corrupt country to get rid of the cartels. Oh, let's not forget that Mexico's war on drugs and organized crime then becomes America's war on drugs and organized crime and we would be operating in a country with a hostile population and little knowledge of the reality on the ground. Add in a war-weary domestic population back in the States and a government debt crisis that only narrowly avoided a major economic disaster.
Or maybe the whole country would welcome our men in arms with a homecooked meal and a nice bottle of tequila...I believe that was roughly the same fantasy people believed would happen in Iraq, no?
Sounds like a plan.
On August 28 2011 10:00 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 09:45 Elegy wrote:On August 28 2011 09:17 zimz wrote:On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap. Too much Starcraft there kiddo. He has a point though. But it's all about money in this case, which US really don't have to spend for another war.
Yes, he does have a point.
He is correct in one thing: the war would certainly be cheaper compared to Iraq and Afghanistan. Because, like he said, it's just a lot closer. Gas adds up, you know?
Invading Mexico would simply make a bad situation worse. Afghan drug production as an example...
|
On August 28 2011 09:17 zimz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 09:11 BlackFlag wrote:On August 28 2011 05:22 zimz wrote: only way to get rid of the cartels, is if a country like the USA decides to invade Mexico and make it part of USA. because the Mexican government is corrupt as hell, basically the cartels own Mexico.
With full on traditional war vs all of Mexico, and permanently increase USA land size.
the Zetas are American trained. we trained the Zetas, so we can destroy the Zetas. Are you seriously insane? You can't even win the war in Iraq or Afghanistan and you really wanna invade Mexico? This is seriously the worst idea I've ever heard when it comes to the war on drugs. The USA would break apart in this try. Invading Mexico is alot easier actually. since Mexico is next door, reinforcements, supplies, equipment, and transportation can be done overnight. Since its close to the USA, it will be a way cheaper war then even Afghanistan or any country. Reinforcements, artillery, tanks and permanent towns came be transported quick and cheap.
yes please save us...
i cant stan living here anymore, one of my ex classmates in college was kidnapped a few months ago and we never see him again, the guy didnt even have any money his family is mid class like mine, he was actually looking for a job
|
Shut up about the idea/logistics of the U.S. invading Mexico this is not the thread for such a discussion go play Civilization V for such an idea/scenario. Stay on topic.
|
reminds me of the wire. "this isn't a war, wars end"
|
It's a war of interests and power above all else. The top parties in Mexico, PRI and PAN, fighting for control of everything, including drug money.
The acting president (PAN) supporting 'El Chapo' Guzman with military forces while the opposition (PRI) defends as best as they can. They know very well PAN will lose the coming elections...which means Chapo is losing the military support. In less than a year the military will now back the PRI's beloved cartels and will hunt Chapo instead. So that's why Chapo has got to get as much as turf as possible before he loses military support...the clock's ticking and time is slipping by.
Hurry boys, your time to shine is running by.
|
I've seen many pictures of the grizzly murder scenes from mexican drug cartels and I thought it resembled a smaller scale holocaust. Those images of 30+ bodies bound and beheaded placed next to a pile of the heads is something I'll never forget and I think if people knew what was going on (saw it with their own eyes) they would realize something needs to be done.
|
With so many interests looming around the subject...it's not that easy to stop it.
|
MONTERREY, Mexico (AP) — Nuevo Leon state launched a new offensive Wednesday against the proliferation of gambling halls as a top politician's brother was videotaped taking wads of cash inside a casino days before a casino fire killed 52 people.
Nuevo Leon Gov. Rodrigo Medina announced initiatives to ban new betting operations and to better regulate existing ones, as well as a corruption probe into Jonas Larrazabal, brother of Monterrey Mayor Fernando Larrazabalwho was caught on videotape visiting several unidentified casinos and being handed large amounts of money.
The newspaper Reforma, which published the images Wednesday, estimated that one wad of cash passed in a cell phone box was 400,000 pesos ($32,000). Mayor Fernando Larrazabal said that he supports the probe.
"First of all, the people voted for Fernando Larrazabal, and I'm not responsible for my brother's actions," he said. "I will ask the prosecutor to investigate and bring whoever is responsible to justice."
Gunmen entered the Casino Royale in Monterrey last Thursday, spread gasoline and set the building on fire, trapping and asphyxiating dozens of gamblers and employees in what's believed to be a case of extortion. Most of the victims were women playing bingo and slots or lunching that afternoon.
The five suspects arrested so far confessed to being part of the Zetas drug cartel. Authorities says they are searching for seven others, as well as the owner of the casino, who is believed to be in the United States.
Source
|
This thread is such a depressive read. Something needs to be done, and sending in army doesn't seem to be working. Something new. Sadly, what needs to be done cannot be done by the mexicans themselves to a large degree, as the market for their product and the main supplier of guns and munitions doesn't seem to care about it's neighbour country except for random acts of publicity stunts like mexican/usa partnership drug busts. That's not going to help at all in the long run except get new politicians elected and old ones in their former positions. Does the violence have to spill over the border before someone in the right position can come with a radical "new" approach?
But the whole situation is just a horrible one, and condolences to the many many families who have been affected.
edit: Also, if you want a story that is eerily similar, look up "Cocaine Cowboys". History seems to be repeating itself.
|
the main supplier of guns and munitions
the main supplier of guns and munitions to the Mexican cartels is the Mexican government thanks to Mexico's epidemic of corruption
the US accounts for less than 10% of cartel guns and ammo
this "blame the US" mentality is annoying as hell, it's not our fault that you have a better than 50-50 chance of bribing or threatening any mexican official into doing whatever the hell you want.
|
On September 03 2011 10:12 DeepElemBlues wrote:the main supplier of guns and munitions to the Mexican cartels is the Mexican government thanks to Mexico's epidemic of corruption the US accounts for less than 10% of cartel guns and ammo this "blame the US" mentality is annoying as hell, it's not our fault that you have a better than 50-50 chance of bribing or threatening any mexican official into doing whatever the hell you want.
You have got to be kidding me. Even if your baseless claim that US only accounts for 10% of Mexicos' drug cartels arms was true, how are the drug cartels so powerful and rich? Who do you think buys their drugs?
It IS our fault the drug cartels are both rich and powerful.
|
You have got to be kidding me. Even if your baseless claim that US only accounts for 10% of Mexicos' drug cartels arms was true,
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110209-mexicos-gun-supply-and-90-percent-myth
Shut up and don't open your mouth without thinking next time.
how are the drug cartels so powerful and rich? Who do you think buys their drugs?
US, Europe, Canada, Mexicans themselves, etc.
And they're so powerful and rich because Mexico has a shitty government and always has, drug cartels in the US don't exist on the Mexican scale because the government would call in the US Army and beat the shit out of them, which is why they are on the other side of the border.
It IS our fault the drug cartels are both rich and powerful.
Nope, not our fault that drugs are illegal, government's fault. Definitely not our fault that they are so powerful in Mexico.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On September 03 2011 10:12 DeepElemBlues wrote:the main supplier of guns and munitions to the Mexican cartels is the Mexican government thanks to Mexico's epidemic of corruption the US accounts for less than 10% of cartel guns and ammo this "blame the US" mentality is annoying as hell, it's not our fault that you have a better than 50-50 chance of bribing or threatening any mexican official into doing whatever the hell you want.
Well, the US consumes a big part of the drugs grown in here, hence why cities in the frontier are being withheld by cartels (Ciudad Juárez, Monterrey)
|
On September 03 2011 10:49 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +You have got to be kidding me. Even if your baseless claim that US only accounts for 10% of Mexicos' drug cartels arms was true, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110209-mexicos-gun-supply-and-90-percent-mythShut up and don't open your mouth without thinking next time. Show nested quote +how are the drug cartels so powerful and rich? Who do you think buys their drugs? US, Europe, Canada, Mexicans themselves, etc. And they're so powerful and rich because Mexico has a shitty government and always has, drug cartels in the US don't exist on the Mexican scale because the government would call in the US Army and beat the shit out of them, which is why they are on the other side of the border. Nope, not our fault that drugs are illegal, government's fault. Definitely not our fault that they are so powerful in Mexico.
Sorry to tell you this, but as a republic, our government is supposed to represent its people.. which it clearly doesnt.
Mexico's government doesn't have endless pockets like that of the united states.. They dont have billions of dollars they can spend on a military police state like we do here at home.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_drug_trade
A UN report said the global drug trade generated an estimated US$321.6 billion in 2003.
In the late 1990s in the United States, for example, the Federal Bureau of Investigation estimated that 5% of murders were drug-related.[6] However, after a crackdown by U.S. and Mexican authorities in the first decade of the 21st century (part of tightened borders security in the wake of the September 11 attacks), border violence inside Mexico surged, with the Mexican government estimating that 90% of the killings are drug-related.
In summary: Mexican drug cartels are profitable because they sell the US drugs. With that money the drug cartels buy weapons. They use those weapons to terrorize their own people. The result of which is the existence of this thread..
|
|
|
|