EPTAnyway, cool R1CH.
New Search Engine - Now Live - Page 6
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
Anyway, cool R1CH. | ||
|
Espers
United Kingdom606 Posts
On December 24 2009 10:16 GrandInquisitor wrote: I think the username portion of the search is a little buggy. Putting in username X and query Y makes it search for Y within topics created by X, not Y within posts by X. E.g.: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=static&t=c&f=-1&u=GrandInquisitor&gb=date turns up posts made by others in one of my topics, but not the post earlier in this topic Yeah this is really annoying, like if I want to search Day[9]'s posts including 'zvp' I only get the ones from his Day[9] daily thread. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
On December 30 2009 02:39 Espers wrote: Yeah this is really annoying, like if I want to search Day[9]'s posts including 'zvp' I only get the ones from his Day[9] daily thread. This should be working now. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13918 Posts
| ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
| ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
It didn't work for me, I just tried searching for a user's name in the username search box, but nothing came up. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
If you check the quoted example, http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=static&t=c&f=-1&u=GrandInquisitor&gb=date you will see it works fine. | ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On December 31 2009 05:59 R1CH wrote: Then the user you searched for has never posted anything containing the words you searched for. If you check the quoted example, http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=static&t=c&f=-1&u=GrandInquisitor&gb=date you will see it works fine. Oh I didn't read properly and I didn't search for any words in the query box. I was just looking for all the topics that the user ever made, so I left the top blank and just filled in the box for username, which worked for the previous search function but doesn't seem to be an option anymore. | ||
pheer
5386 Posts
Hype threads and other constantly OP-edited threads will probably be affected the most by the one-time indexing. Cool that you got this setup though. I can only imagine the type of ram a fulltext search on TL would suck up.. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24628 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
On January 02 2010 07:05 micronesia wrote: Do quotation marks serve any purpose? According to my tests they don't restrict how the search narrows results at all... The currently only work if the entire search query is surrounded, individual sub-phrases are not implemented yet. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
On January 02 2010 06:52 pheer wrote: You should keep the mysql search active Nope, MySQL search locks the DB. It's gone and not coming back, indexes are already dropped which saved almost a gig, allowing the other more-useful indexes to stay in RAM. I really doubt people need to search to be able to find a LR thread. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24628 Posts
| ||
|
Asjo
Denmark664 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
"While stopwords are not indexed, they still do affect the keyword positions. For instance, assume that "the" is a stopword, that document 1 contains the line "in office", and that document 2 contains "in the office". Searching for "in office" as for exact phrase will only return the first document, as expected, even though "the" in the second one is stopped. Stopwords currently include common terms like I, a, the. Thus, searching for "I'm a dragoon" will actually search for "m * dragoon" while "I am a dragoon" will search for "* am * dragoon". Both searches will still have goon / dragoon mapping applied. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24628 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
| ||
|
savagepanda
China2 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
| ||
|
pheer
5386 Posts
| ||
| ||
