|
On December 20 2009 08:09 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2009 08:04 Turbovolver wrote:On December 20 2009 02:29 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 01:45 LaughingTulkas wrote:Probably the only one like this on here, but I'm engaged and we're waiting till we're married. The honeymoon is something to look forward to eh? Sometimes delayed gratification is better  Ha, not when it only lasts for 30 seconds. No amount of masturbation can prepare you for it either. I... I don't think this is what happens the first time. 30 seconds is hyperbole. But sex isn't all that amazing for the girl the first time a guy has sex, because he's most likely bad at it (and so is a girl having sex for the first time).
The idea that people are "bad" at sex if they haven't had it before is such a bunch of shit. The first time I had sex it lasted 30+ minutes and was amazing. I don't know if it's the media or what that keeps perpetuating this stupid idea that the first time you do it you'll be bad at it. It's pretty hard to be bad at sex, honestly.
Also, anyone who says they wouldn't turn down sex ever has never been in a long term relationship. I doubt that anyone who has been having sex with someone for more than a year and/or is living with the person hasn't turned down sex at least once.
|
Only if they had an STD, I really don't care what she looks like.
|
United States22883 Posts
On December 21 2009 11:33 baal wrote:Im a little bitch that gets emotionally involved too but i dont turn down sex , my penis is stronger, however, my lazyness is stronger than my penis like this good looking girl asks me in the middle of the night to pay her a visit, ive declined many times cuz i need to take a shower, get dressed, drive to her house etc... yawns.
It's not about the penis, it's about the <3. I have no problem with one night stands, I just don't do them.
|
United States22883 Posts
On December 21 2009 12:22 PJA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2009 08:09 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 08:04 Turbovolver wrote:On December 20 2009 02:29 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 01:45 LaughingTulkas wrote:Probably the only one like this on here, but I'm engaged and we're waiting till we're married. The honeymoon is something to look forward to eh? Sometimes delayed gratification is better Ha, not when it only lasts for 30 seconds. No amount of masturbation can prepare you for it either. I... I don't think this is what happens the first time. 30 seconds is hyperbole. But sex isn't all that amazing for the girl the first time a guy has sex, because he's most likely bad at it (and so is a girl having sex for the first time). The idea that people are "bad" at sex if they haven't had it before is such a bunch of shit. The first time I had sex it lasted 30+ minutes and was amazing. I don't know if it's the media or what that keeps perpetuating this stupid idea that the first time you do it you'll be bad at it. It's pretty hard to be bad at sex, honestly.
The idea is that most people lose their virginity around 16~ and 16 year olds are fucking terrible at sex.
|
So basically Jibba, you're saying you have sex with 16 year olds.
np brah, welcome to da club.
|
I don't see the problem for either situation. Sounds like my dreams
|
On December 21 2009 12:22 PJA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2009 08:09 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 08:04 Turbovolver wrote:On December 20 2009 02:29 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 01:45 LaughingTulkas wrote:Probably the only one like this on here, but I'm engaged and we're waiting till we're married. The honeymoon is something to look forward to eh? Sometimes delayed gratification is better Ha, not when it only lasts for 30 seconds. No amount of masturbation can prepare you for it either. I... I don't think this is what happens the first time. 30 seconds is hyperbole. But sex isn't all that amazing for the girl the first time a guy has sex, because he's most likely bad at it (and so is a girl having sex for the first time). The idea that people are "bad" at sex if they haven't had it before is such a bunch of shit. The first time I had sex it lasted 30+ minutes and was amazing. I don't know if it's the media or what that keeps perpetuating this stupid idea that the first time you do it you'll be bad at it. It's pretty hard to be bad at sex, honestly.
ROFL this is absolutely wrong and even irrational.
Ofcourse you will suck at sex as a novice, it doesnt mean a 50yo guy is amazing, same as a Taxi driver wont beat Schumacher just because he has driven more Kilometers.
However if you take interest in sex, dont have a narrow mind like to experiment and educate yourself, your skill will increase greatly, but you are probably still very young so you dont know this yet.
|
On December 20 2009 18:19 MaReK wrote:Fat chicks need love too. But they gotta pay.
Giggity Giggity Giggity... Awllllllright
|
On December 19 2009 06:58 Emon_ wrote:
Reading another topic here on TL got me thinking about attitudes towards sex. I've written out two situations bellow of typical circumstances when saying no to sex would be an option. I would love to hear if anyone would turn down sex in either one of them, and for what reasons.
Situation 1
Say you were looking for a relationship and could date a different girl every day of the week. After a few dates, you and the girl would get to know each other better and become intimate. Since you are dating several girls at once and aren't really committed to any one of them, you have a lot of sex with different girls. Would you at some point decide that you've had too many partners and start saying no to sex?
Situation 2
Once a week for a year, a hot girl would come into your life and start flirting with you. You didn't sign up for this, but she's ready to go. There are no strings attached and a new one would take her place the next week. Would you turn it down and continue going about your day, or would you sleep with her?
#1 ... No? Only if a girl that I could see myself getting married to came along.
#2 ..........Never, unless htey had STD;s otherwise id be tapping it weekly.
|
The day9 daily is in an hour, and there hasn't been one for a while. i was so hyped for last night's, but then there were software issues. there is NO WAY im missing it tonight (lol)
|
See my sig 
|
On December 21 2009 12:22 PJA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2009 08:09 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 08:04 Turbovolver wrote:On December 20 2009 02:29 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 01:45 LaughingTulkas wrote:Probably the only one like this on here, but I'm engaged and we're waiting till we're married. The honeymoon is something to look forward to eh? Sometimes delayed gratification is better Ha, not when it only lasts for 30 seconds. No amount of masturbation can prepare you for it either. I... I don't think this is what happens the first time. 30 seconds is hyperbole. But sex isn't all that amazing for the girl the first time a guy has sex, because he's most likely bad at it (and so is a girl having sex for the first time). The idea that people are "bad" at sex if they haven't had it before is such a bunch of shit. The first time I had sex it lasted 30+ minutes and was amazing. I don't know if it's the media or what that keeps perpetuating this stupid idea that the first time you do it you'll be bad at it. It's pretty hard to be bad at sex, honestly. Also, anyone who says they wouldn't turn down sex ever has never been in a long term relationship. I doubt that anyone who has been having sex with someone for more than a year and/or is living with the person hasn't turned down sex at least once.
Well, you either masturbated already or you got lucky or you have natural talent. Not every guy has those options on the first time. Girls is a different story. It's literally impossible to suck at sex the first time for girls - because of the whole v-card thing.
|
On December 19 2009 06:58 Emon_ wrote:
Reading another topic here on TL got me thinking about attitudes towards sex. I've written out two situations bellow of typical circumstances when saying no to sex would be an option. I would love to hear if anyone would turn down sex in either one of them, and for what reasons.
Situation 1
Say you were looking for a relationship and could date a different girl every day of the week. After a few dates, you and the girl would get to know each other better and become intimate. Since you are dating several girls at once and aren't really committed to any one of them, you have a lot of sex with different girls. Would you at some point decide that you've had too many partners and start saying no to sex?
Situation 2
Once a week for a year, a hot girl would come into your life and start flirting with you. You didn't sign up for this, but she's ready to go. There are no strings attached and a new one would take her place the next week. Would you turn it down and continue going about your day, or would you sleep with her?
edit: whoops.
Situation 1:
I would be choosey, as I am now. Once your game is on a certain level, you have the right to be choosey like a stuck up girl. Think about it, generally men are the ones trying to woo girls and get rejected and all that, but when you are good with women and dating, the roles reverse and you become the man to please. I just make my standards higher and make her work more for everything she gets out of me.
Situation 2.
Shes hot, why not. If you are attracted to her, and she wants it, then stick it to her. Wrap it up. Dont seem like you are putting the pussy on a pedastal. I would fuck her and continue my day like normal.
|
On December 23 2009 11:07 BearJamon wrote:
Well, you either masturbated already or you got lucky or you have natural talent. Not every guy has those options on the first time. Girls is a different story. It's literally impossible to suck at sex the first time for girls - because of the whole v-card thing.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh'
Some girls suck at sex. Wether they are virgins or not, I don't know what the fuck went wrong. Some women just don't know how to do it, and it is seriously a turn off. I would rather talk to her about SC.
edit: I would rather talk to her mom.
|
I'd only turn it down for the live OSL/MSL Jaedong vs S-Class gamer to watch !
|
If they had a STD or are ugly.
|
On December 23 2009 11:13 larjarse wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2009 11:07 BearJamon wrote:
Well, you either masturbated already or you got lucky or you have natural talent. Not every guy has those options on the first time. Girls is a different story. It's literally impossible to suck at sex the first time for girls - because of the whole v-card thing. Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh' Some girls suck at sex. Wether they are virgins or not, I don't know what the fuck went wrong. Some women just don't know how to do it, and it is seriously a turn off. I would rather talk to her about SC. edit: I would rather talk to her mom.
That's ridiculous.
What would her mom know about Starcraft?
|
On December 23 2009 10:41 baal wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2009 12:22 PJA wrote:On December 20 2009 08:09 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 08:04 Turbovolver wrote:On December 20 2009 02:29 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On December 20 2009 01:45 LaughingTulkas wrote:Probably the only one like this on here, but I'm engaged and we're waiting till we're married. The honeymoon is something to look forward to eh? Sometimes delayed gratification is better Ha, not when it only lasts for 30 seconds. No amount of masturbation can prepare you for it either. I... I don't think this is what happens the first time. 30 seconds is hyperbole. But sex isn't all that amazing for the girl the first time a guy has sex, because he's most likely bad at it (and so is a girl having sex for the first time). The idea that people are "bad" at sex if they haven't had it before is such a bunch of shit. The first time I had sex it lasted 30+ minutes and was amazing. I don't know if it's the media or what that keeps perpetuating this stupid idea that the first time you do it you'll be bad at it. It's pretty hard to be bad at sex, honestly. ROFL this is absolutely wrong and even irrational. Ofcourse you will suck at sex as a novice, it doesnt mean a 50yo guy is amazing, same as a Taxi driver wont beat Schumacher just because he has driven more Kilometers. However if you take interest in sex, dont have a narrow mind like to experiment and educate yourself, your skill will increase greatly, but you are probably still very young so you dont know this yet.
Just to reply to the couple of people on here who've replied to my post. I'm sure I'll have a lot to learn about sex, as will she, but that's kinda the point. We'll be getting good at having sex with each other, and each other only. I'll be learning what she likes, and her the same. There aren't going to be any comparisons, any "well so-and-so did this" or "so-and-so liked this." We'll both be learning each other only. And I'll be willing to bet after a while we'll get pretty good at it. I think it's going to be a fun process, and I'm looking forward to it! She's the only one I want to spend my life with, and want to share sex with.
As for the person who suggested we should be enjoying it now, again, I think delayed gratification isn't a bad thing, but also, if you want the sort of thing I described above, the commitment of marriage is a good thing to wait for. It kinda solidifies the whole "just each other" thing.
But I'm also the kinda person who never likes to see their gifts before Christmas, I like to wait and have the surprise be better. And I'm old-school romantic, I'll wait for the honeymoon :D
|
I would turn down sex to go camping
|
On December 27 2009 19:00 MassArbiterFTW wrote:
I would turn down sex to go camping
who wouldn't? camping is awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
