EPT[P]Women In The Infantry - Page 12
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
StarBrift
Sweden1761 Posts
| ||
|
Tenryu
United States565 Posts
On November 12 2009 18:40 KwarK wrote: It doesn't cost that much to train one soldier and if they were incapable they would be weeded out early in the training. Plus that ignores the fact that you let men try and fail. The military can't afford to waste that money giving men a chance. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_cost_of_training_a_soldier_in_the_military The chances of a male soldier passing basic training and the additional training required will be much higher then that of a female. Infact, the chances of a male soldier passing basic alone, infantry or not, is much higher then that of a female. And the sad thing is that the requirments and the state of training in basic training has been dumbed down immensley in the past couple of years. You can argue all you want but unless you have experience in the situation, i dont wanna hear it =\ | ||
|
Railxp
Hong Kong1313 Posts
| ||
|
2b-Rigtheous
Korea (South)50 Posts
Feminist: "but women and men are the same, it's only our culture that has shaped women's roles" lol!!!! Nature, look it up in the dictionary... | ||
|
Ghardo
Germany1685 Posts
| ||
|
Brett
Australia3820 Posts
I know, I know. Serious discussion and all... But I couldn't help it. It just popped in there. | ||
|
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On November 12 2009 13:27 EniraM(CA) wrote: Wrong. You still fail to see the big picture. And by posting me 1 picture of some body builder (lol) you prove how little you understand. She may have muscles and upper body strength. But all other points are still valid. She doesn't have the cold blooded-ness to be in the infantry. haha Have you ever watched high level women judo/wrestling/mma/boxing ? Sure they are not on the same level than their top male counterparts but they will RAPE your average grunt. Ktfo-ed, ippon-ed or subbed. | ||
|
JFKWT
Singapore1442 Posts
On November 12 2009 19:26 Railxp wrote: Your life, do whatever you want with it. Women are allowed to get themselves killed just as much as men are. By all means go ahead. I agree with that. P.S. 1 more post to 666 =p | ||
|
SlobodanMilosevic
Serbia7 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i37.tinypic.com/15x9xep.jpg) Sorry, but I just had to sign up just to post this | ||
|
oN_Silva
197 Posts
man always will belief Two things of a woman, 1. that she is weak 2. that she is attracted to him i think its rather a issue of the man, they should work on their professionalism to handle their teammates just a teammates. | ||
|
Cloud
Sexico5880 Posts
Theres the physical tests which both should pass and even if a male soldier that passed them is still stronger than a woman, grunts and such get usually pumped with steroids or get blood doped or get high on extasis or whatever other shit before combat or various other stuff that can bridge the difference a little. The issue about equality and all that crap about everyone having a right to fight (I wouldn't fight if I was forced to and fuck it) is bigger anyway. However the main deterrent would be psychological capabilities, and I believe men are genetically more aggressive and colder. And well even for average male grunts, one war is already too many. | ||
|
yooh
China223 Posts
How about women who get their period and stuff in trenches... ugh.. I don't believe in equality... | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On November 13 2009 00:35 yooh wrote: I dont think boobs belong in trenches.. How about women who get their period and stuff in trenches... ugh.. I don't believe in equality... Good god. | ||
|
Ganfei
Taiwan1439 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
| ||
|
A3iL3r0n
United States2196 Posts
If you have a lot of women passing the test, then I think the test is not hard enough. It is only nature, that in general, men are more athletically gifted than women and so the tests should bear that out. Obviously, some women will be able to also pass the hypothetical "more difficult" test, and they should be allowed to join. | ||
|
AnWh
Sweden220 Posts
On November 12 2009 07:26 CharlieMurphy wrote: yea, now imagine how much worse that situation would be for a woman. I'm pretty sure sexual humiliation feels pretty much the same regardless of gender. Other than that it's pretty amazing how some people believe, in the year of 2009, that men by nature are born more cold-minded and focused than women. That's like 50 years ago to me. Women should be allowed to participate. If you pass the physical test you're in. Maybe talk to a shrink as well to make sure these oh so fragile beings have the balls to fire a gun and keep calm in combat. | ||
|
iloveHieu
United States1919 Posts
| ||
|
DreaM)XeRO
Korea (South)4667 Posts
NO | ||
micronesia
United States24680 Posts
On November 13 2009 01:28 iloveHieu wrote: I've seen so many threads on the internet about this topic jesus. Despite how many fools say women should be allowed it won't happen and there's many good reasons for it. Front line of fire is for men, leave it to them. The same exact post you made could be used for pretty much every issue ever that women have since gained access to. ex On November 13 2009 01:28 iloveHieu wrote: I've seen so many threads on the internet about this topic jesus. Despite how many fools say women should be allowed to vote won't happen and there's many good reasons for it. Politics/voting is for men, leave it to them. Calling someone a fool without any legit justification is rather foolish, don't you think? | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://www.bodybuildingweekly.com/thumbnail.php?file=KristyHawkins1a_801545083.jpg&size=article_medium)
