NFL Playoffs 2008-2009 - Page 33
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
| ||
|
Centric
United States1989 Posts
| ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
|
ChezGod
United States590 Posts
On November 11 2008 17:08 zer0das wrote: Their defense is good, their running game is great, and their QB is good enough to punish teams that defend only the run. That's about it. Agreed. They have a deadly running combination, a great O and D line, a good secondary, and a QB that can do the job required of him. Running and defending the run wins games | ||
|
dNo_O
United States233 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
On November 11 2008 17:12 ChezGod wrote: Agreed. They have a deadly running combination, a great O and D line, a good secondary, and a QB that can do the job required of him. Running and defending the run wins games tis true fucking martz, why the fuck would you NOT have gore in there. mrob is nice, but it's FRANK FUCKINGGORE> | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
On November 12 2008 00:09 Hawk wrote: tis true fucking martz, why the fuck would you NOT have gore in there. mrob is nice, but it's FRANK FUCKINGGORE> thank god he didn't put gore in lolsupmartzthxforthewin | ||
|
JudgeMathis
Cuba1286 Posts
Ward, Fitzgerald, Moore, Berrian, T.O. | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On November 12 2008 02:21 JudgeMathis wrote: I don't know if I should start TO or not. :\ My current WR lineup ATM: Ward, Fitzgerald, Moore, Berrian, T.O. Do you start two or three? I would play T.O. over Moore or Berrian. Guys, Frank Gore wouldn't have gotten in the end zone either. The Cardinals were ready for the run, and unless he bounced outside again there was no hope for any running back making it past the goal line. | ||
|
nemY
United States3119 Posts
On November 12 2008 13:32 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: Do you start two or three? I would play T.O. over Moore or Berrian. Guys, Frank Gore wouldn't have gotten in the end zone either. The Cardinals were ready for the run, and unless he bounced outside again there was no hope for any running back making it past the goal line. Yeah it was a bad call by the Martz... the play before that where Shaun Hill took 25? seconds to spike the ball wasn't that hot either. Still, it was probably the best game we played all year ... at least the best 3 quarters we played all year :r | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
| ||
|
Dknight
United States5225 Posts
On November 12 2008 23:17 KOFgokuon wrote: A friend of mine made a very interesting point earlier this week. What happens next year if the Patriots make it to the superbowl this year? what does belichik do about his quarterback situation? You'd think that the choice would be easy brady >> cassell ez, but at the same time, it's a pretty similar situation to what happened back in 99 / 00 whenever it was. long time established pro bowl quarterback upstaged by a relatively unknown low draft pick quarterback. and let's be honest here it isn't like belichik isn't perfectly willing to cut productive and slightly older players Without a doubt Brady is the man. He is one of the best quarterbacks of the past decade. Cassel is just getting by. Look at the Colts game - 5 fieldgoals is not acceptable. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
On November 12 2008 23:17 KOFgokuon wrote: A friend of mine made a very interesting point earlier this week. What happens next year if the Patriots make it to the superbowl this year? what does belichik do about his quarterback situation? You'd think that the choice would be easy brady >> cassell ez, but at the same time, it's a pretty similar situation to what happened back in 99 / 00 whenever it was. long time established pro bowl quarterback upstaged by a relatively unknown low draft pick quarterback. and let's be honest here it isn't like belichik isn't perfectly willing to cut productive and slightly older players Bledsoe took 3 seasons to get the amount of tds Brady had in one. Kinda simple answer ;p | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
brady's not getting any younger, and it's not like he's going to be any more mobile when he comes back from that knee surgery | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
Brady 62 and 68% 24-12 50-8 Bledsoe 57 and 59% 19-21 17-13 Plus, if you take the team records into account, it's not even close. Brady had this team in the playoffs and Bledsoe didnt have. I'd say it's not even a question. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BledDr00.htm http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTo00.htm[/spoiler] | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
interesting to theorycraft....well not theorycraft...theory...ball? theory...gm? whatever btw, i fucking hate andy reid. trades away last year's first rounder to the panthers for their first rounder, and now the panthers have the 3rd or 4th best record in football GOOD JOB. GOD DAMNIT AOJTO#I$JTOI#J$T | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
| ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
favre had a pretty damn good game here's hoping warner crushes the..seahawks? | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On November 15 2008 00:44 KOFgokuon wrote: damn, i started warner instead of favre this week favre had a pretty damn good game here's hoping warner crushes the..seahawks? That is really likely. His stats will probably be similar to last weeks stats. 300+ yds, 2+ TD's. | ||
| ||
... at least the best 3 quarters we played all year :r