On February 06 2011 01:23 Liquid`Drone wrote: obviously barcelona
I really don't get why they would be called that ... ? :O What exactly would be pretentious about them? I could see RM being called Elitist i guess, i was seriously confused ._.;
On February 06 2011 01:23 Liquid`Drone wrote: obviously barcelona
I really don't get why they would be called that ... ? :O What exactly would be pretentious about them? I could see RM being called Elitist i guess, i was seriously confused ._.;
Well i love barca i really do but they are on the brink of bancrupcy. They have a fantastic youth system but they still spent around 75 million on ibra if you count etoo into the deal. And that at a time when it was absolutly clear they could not afford it. Some even say that the days of football this beautiful will be counted in barca cause they are simply not able to afford it anymore
what a bunch of blind fanboys here jesus.. (ok actually its mostly just one..) these complaints about the referee are just retarded. I mean, yes, newcastle's second penalty wasn't one for sure and the first one was slightly rough, and barton or whomever was supposed to have gotten a yellow card.
fair enough. but the red card was perfectly fine by the referee - you should direct your anger towards diaby here. van persie was offside. and newcastle got one goal wrongly disallowed, and this was even the one decision that was easiest for the referee to get right because roscisky was cancelling the offside by like 2 meters.
arsenal completely lacks defensive cynicsm ,and after they were down to 10 guys (correctly) and conceded the first goal, they completely fell together. blaming this on the referee is just stupid as hell: arsenal went from 4:0 to 4:4 in a 20 minute timespan. one wrongly given penalty (cancelled out by wrongly disallowed goal) and one penalty which was on the slightly strict side doesn't excuse that arsenal lost a won game.