EPTTL Chess Match - Page 9
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
huameng
United States1133 Posts
| ||
l10f
United States3241 Posts
| ||
|
Khenra
Netherlands885 Posts
| ||
|
jfazz
Australia672 Posts
| ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
|
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
On October 20 2009 08:33 Slayer91 wrote: b7-b6 | ||
|
O-ops
United States4236 Posts
Queen's Indian is something i probably seen too much, and oftentimes the game will turn into both side jockeying for positional advantages for the endgame. On the other hand, we could stir shit up with a sharp benoni  | ||
|
SnowFantasy
4173 Posts
On October 20 2009 08:33 Slayer91 wrote: b7-b6 | ||
|
l10f
United States3241 Posts
On October 20 2009 11:27 O-ops wrote: I vote c7-c5 Queen's Indian is something i probably seen too much, and oftentimes the game will turn into both side jockeying for positional advantages for the endgame. On the other hand, we could stir shit up with a sharp benoni + Show Spoiler + If we go defensively, we should have the advantage, no? | ||
Spazer
Canada8028 Posts
| ||
|
unknown.sam
Philippines2701 Posts
| ||
|
Khenra
Netherlands885 Posts
On October 20 2009 12:00 l10f wrote: + Show Spoiler + If we go defensively, we should have the advantage, no? + Show Spoiler + I'm afraid you won't ever have the advantage when playing black. Generally, it's better to play sharply as black, as it drastically increases your win chances. On correspondence games like this one however, people have 24 hours to think about their move, so sharp play will often not work out too well. So you're right, defensive play is the way to go for now. | ||
|
O-ops
United States4236 Posts
On October 20 2009 12:00 l10f wrote: + Show Spoiler + If we go defensively, we should have the advantage, no? + Show Spoiler + The thing is, this is suppose to be fun, no? | ||
|
cascades
Singapore6122 Posts
| ||
|
iloveambiguity
United States81 Posts
On October 20 2009 12:00 l10f wrote: + Show Spoiler + If we go defensively, we should have the advantage, no? well, if we d its hard to get an advantage, at some point we need to go for an attack to achieve a win.... | ||
Empyrean
16951 Posts
On October 20 2009 13:57 iloveambiguity wrote: well, if we d its hard to get an advantage, at some point we need to go for an attack to achieve a win.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigran_Petrosian Although I doubt TL could play in a strategic style reminiscent of Petrosian effectively. | ||
|
Athos
United States2484 Posts
| ||
|
anImaru
United States106 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On October 20 2009 13:28 Khenra wrote: + Show Spoiler + I'm afraid you won't ever have the advantage when playing black. Generally, it's better to play sharply as black, as it drastically increases your win chances. On correspondence games like this one however, people have 24 hours to think about their move, so sharp play will often not work out too well. So you're right, defensive play is the way to go for now. + Show Spoiler + your realise that only applies to the super gm level right? Anything less than that really black can and does win all the time, and it doesnt take nearly as much to gain a positional advantage or failing that gaining an advantage from superior tactics when the game transitions from pos>to tactics. | ||
|
Syntax Lost
Finland86 Posts
| ||
| ||
