December Kespa: Rank Name Team Points 1 NaDa Pantech EX 1,456.3 2 2 sAviOr[gm] CJ Entus 1,416.3 1 3 [GsP]JJu+___+ KHAN 1,103.8 1 4 [SouL]ChoJJa KTF MagicNs 1,059.5 2 5 GooDFriend KTF MagicNs 1,033.3 1 6 midas[gm] SK Telecom T1 1,032.8 1 7 AnyTime..[gm] Lecaf OZ 1,026.3 4 8 GoRush SK Telecom T1 906.8 6 9 IriS[gm] CJ Entus 902.0 - 10 Nal_rA KTF MagicNs 846.4 5 11 s.s.m~[SiLvEr] Pantech EX 822.0 2 12 Casy OGN Sparkyz 804.0 4 13 Zergman KHAN 787.0 3 14 YellOw[ArnC] OGN Sparkyz 718.6 3 15 July MBC HERO 709.0 3 16 iloveoov SK Telecom T1 706.1 6 17 Bisu[Shield] MBC HERO 690.8 2 18 GGPlay Hanbitstars 687.3 - 19 Sea[Shield] MBC HERO 674.5 4 20 XellOs[yG] CJ Entus 668.3 1 21 [NC]...YellOw KTF MagicNs 630.0 2 22 PuSan[S.G] MBC HERO 611.1 - 23 Nal_Rock Pantech EX 585.8 3 24 N.Die_Jaedong Lecaf OZ 584.5 NEW 25 Hwansin[S.sir] STX SouL 570.1 NEW 26 Ever)P(TT KHAN 556.8 3 27 Kingdom SK Telecom T1 552.3 3 28 LighT[AlivE] MBC HERO 508.8 NEW 29 sigamari KHAN 506.8 1 30 Stork[gm] KHAN 506.6 4
The following records are from Jan 1st 2006 to Dec 2nd 2006. They include all TV matches (Proleague, OSL, MSL, ODT, Survivor League), preliminaries, and WCG. They do not include WCG matches with foreigners.
1. Hwasin 19-9 67.8% !? we knew he had good TvZ, but to see him at the top of the list still is surprising. During the MSL group selection, several Zergs didn\'t want to meet him (until Savior took him into his group ; )), I understand that much better now. 2. Light 24-12 66.6% !? Same thing as with Hwasin. Particuarly surprising is the number of games, only Nada has played more TvZ than him. 3. Xellos 21-12 63.6% :O When\'s Xellos been this good lately? And from where does he have so many game? 4. iloveoov 14-8 63.6% 5. Midas 20-12 62.5% 6. Casy 17-11 60.7% Sea 17-11 60.7% 8. GoodFriend 13-9 59.0% 9. Nada 24-21 53.3% Seems surprising, but Nada\'s TvZ was by far his weakest until quite recently, he lost alot in proleague. 10. Iris 12-13 48.0%
vs Protoss
1. Light 12-4 75.0% ?!! And I used to think I was following progaming very closely. I guess I need to start memorizing every proleague game now. ; ) 2. GoodFriend 12-5 70.5% GF is underrated. 3. Xellos 8-4 66.6% 4. Iris 13-7 65.0% o_O 5. Nada 24-15 61.5% 6. Midas 14-10 58.3% 7. Sea 12-10 54.5% 8. Hwasin 4-5 44.4% 9. iloveoov 10-13 43.4% 10. Casy 3-11 21.4% lolll
1. Bisu 19-11 63.3% Wow, we all knew he was good, but that he would be first... 2. Anytime 21-14 60.0% 3. Pusan 15-11 57.6% 3. Stork 15-11 57.6% ?! Wow, Pusan and Stork before rA. 5. Nal_Ra 15-13 53.5% 6. TT 10-9 52.6% lolz, what the hell is he doing here 7. Rock 13-12 52.0% I take Rock before Kingdom as a peresonal insult 8. Kingdom 8-9 47.0% 9. Reach 9-12 42.8% 10. IntoTheRainbow 1-7 12.5%
vs Zerg
1. TT 7-4 63.6% Only 11 games, but still what the heck? 2. Bisu 18-12 60.0% 3. Stork 16-14 53.3% 4. Pusan 10-9 52.6% Pusan and Stork before rA in PvZ?!? 5. Nal_Ra 16-16 50.0% 6. Anytime 15-15 50.0% 7. Rock 8-8 50.0% 8. IntoTheRainbow 10-12 45.4% 9. Kingdom 7-9 43.7% 10. Reach 9-13 40.9%
Total
1. Bisu 40-27 59.7% 2. TT 22-17 56.4% asdfjklö what the fuck. Either I\'ve seen all the wrong games of this guy, or he\'s cheesed every game. 3. Anytime 40-32 55.5% 4. Nal_Ra 41-33 55.4% 5. Stork 37-30 55.2% 6. Pusan 30-25 54.5% 7. Rock 21-21 50.0% 8. Reach 24-28 46.1% 9. Kingdom 18-28 39.1% 10. IntoTheRainbow 13-23 36.1% Come back please Rainbow T_T
If 1/3 of the all players are Protoss, the chance that the lack of Protoss players in the top 10 is due to chance rather than imbalance is 1.7% ((1/3)^10). If only 1/4 players are Protoss (as some people say they're less popular anyway), there's still only a 5.6% chance ((3/4)^10) that the lack of Protoss players in the top 10 is due to chance.
edit: could someone please delete that space-wasting post above.
Ugh. If that was a joke I couldn't find the funny in it.
Dang, I knew IriS was getting crazy good but I never would have though he would statistically be the best Terran. I still think XellOs is the best. Then NaDa.
I'm pretty sure the 10 or 11 players of each race were chosen by the guy who made the statistics and he didn't necessarily take top 10. Free, Much and Daezang probably have higher stats then Reach and Rainbow for example.
The problem with these stats is that they don't take in count the level of the opponent. Losing 3-2 to Nada is probably harder then beating Casy 3-2 but with these stats the later one score more points. So I'm not suprised to see so many "new" player with high stats (Bisu, Jaedong, Light, TT). They didn't constantly play in the Starleagues, so you could reasonably argue that their stack of opponent was weaker (on a year long basis).
But these are nice stats and are appreciated. Thx !
How does this work? Does every professional sponsored player on there have to play against every other pro and then its kind of like an open season between these guys?
On December 03 2006 16:12 Beamo wrote: I'm pretty sure the 10 or 11 players of each race were chosen by the guy who made the statistics and he didn't necessarily take top 10. Free, Much and Daezang probably have higher stats then Reach and Rainbow for example.
The problem with these stats is that they don't take in count the level of the opponent. Losing 3-2 to Nada is probably harder then beating Casy 3-2 but with these stats the later one score more points. So I'm not suprised to see so many "new" player with high stats (Bisu, Jaedong, Light, TT). They didn't constantly play in the Starleagues, so you could reasonably argue that their stack of opponent was weaker (on a year long basis).
But these are nice stats and are appreciated. Thx !
These are excellent points that I hope everybody keeps in mind when viewing these stats.
Not everybody's level of competition has been equal.
On December 03 2006 17:04 Javelin wrote: How does this work? Does every professional sponsored player on there have to play against every other pro and then its kind of like an open season between these guys?
No, this is an inofficial ranking done by a fan.
Progaming is divided into three (major) leagues. Ongamenet Starleague, MBC Starleague, and Proleague. The two Starleagues are a tourament for the best players (Ongamenet is 24 players, MBC 16 players). There are seperate leagues to qualify for Starleagues. Proleague is a league between the different pro teams.
What this fan did, was collect all the statistics of all the different leagues and compile them to a ranking. It's not necessarily an accurate rating because you don't get more points for winning a Starleague final game than winning in a Survivor League game.
On December 03 2006 16:12 Beamo wrote: I'm pretty sure the 10 or 11 players of each race were chosen by the guy who made the statistics and he didn't necessarily take top 10. Free, Much and Daezang probably have higher stats then Reach and Rainbow for example.
well i'm pretty sure he chose the top 10 or 11 players of each race by taking everyone that was in top 30 kespa
and since there were only like 9 protoss gamers in the top 30 he added the next highest ones (according to kespa) i think....
ironically there were too many zergs so he left off sigamari
thanks a lot for showing us that, nice to see the most recent stats even if it doesn't factor in opponents, maps, league etc.
On December 03 2006 16:12 Beamo wrote: I'm pretty sure the 10 or 11 players of each race were chosen by the guy who made the statistics and he didn't necessarily take top 10. Free, Much and Daezang probably have higher stats then Reach and Rainbow for example.
well i'm pretty sure he chose the top 10 or 11 players of each race by taking everyone that was in top 30 kespa
I was saying that he didn't take the top 10 protoss with the highest winning %
But it looks like you are right on how he chose the players
EPT
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/replay/zerg.gif)
![[image loading]](http://image.fighterforum.com/showImage.asp?realFile=FFPHOT20061202213733011.JPG)
yeah chojja is def #1 zerg 
