On May 14 2011 06:40 motbob wrote: Oh whoops, I thought you had abandoned the fanclub long ago. If I had known you were still active in updating the OP I wouldn't have made any changes! Sorry about that.
Still, I don't regret the change. No OP should have a header that takes up that much space.
Of course, I don't mind making a poll about it to see how people feel. If it's up to me though, I'd keep it, because especially since a lot of the fanclubs have started using headers that fit well to TL's design, all the OPs look similarly apart from the photos at the top. If anything, the photo in this OP was scaled to fit the page and updated every few months.
Man headers are serious business. Doubly so cause IdrA fans are serious in their own right. This is reminding me of when Trading Spaces goes wrong. I like it. Motbob, see how many times you can edit the OP before xtfftc blows a vein.
Haha. I like how you're trying to take the high ground by putting up a poll and then saying, "well, it's the will of the people, I guess I should edit the picture back in!" after a week.
You'd be able to take the high ground more easily if the poll weren't really biased. Just my opinion, though!
Personally, I think you should stop being passive-aggressive and just edit the photo back in! It's not a big deal.
Can we change it out for a different picture? No offense but as baller as it is the GSL picture isn't that relevant anymore. Lets have a vote after the vote about what picture is up there! YAY DEMOGRACY!
On May 14 2011 07:18 motbob wrote: Haha. I like how you're trying to take the high ground by putting up a poll and then saying, "well, it's the will of the people, I guess I should edit the picture back in!" after a week.
You'd be able to take the high ground more easily if the poll weren't really biased. Just my opinion, though!
Personally, I think you should stop being passive-aggressive and just edit the photo back in! It's not a big deal.
On May 14 2011 07:18 motbob wrote: Haha. I like how you're trying to take the high ground by putting up a poll and then saying, "well, it's the will of the people, I guess I should edit the picture back in!" after a week.
You'd be able to take the high ground more easily if the poll weren't really biased. Just my opinion, though!
Personally, I think you should stop being passive-aggressive and just edit the photo back in! It's not a big deal.
are you implying that IdrA wasn't a baller in that photo?
On May 14 2011 04:37 xtfftc wrote: I'm assuming that their history doesn't start with Idra's "I consider the match a walkover" and Cruncher's in-game BM during TSL - they have probably exchanged pleasentries on ladder before that. It's all blown way out of proportion, as it usually is. Complexity's "disappointment" is hypocritical but they are expected to defend their player, even when he is BM. Similarly, no one expects Liquid to publicly say anything negative about Huk.
It didn't even start publicly at that, actually.
Was the first time I had heard of cruncher too; kinda makes his obsession for trolling idra understandable in a way. The embarrassment from this game and the walkover comment had to have left cruncher with some extremely bitter thoughts to mull over.
Are they not disappointed in cruncher's trollbaiting of idra? Does complexity believe Cruncher really had no part in this? It takes two to tango, guys. While cruncher's approach is more conspicuous than Idra's, he's been trying really hard the past month or two to get a huge rise out of idra, from "" to stream sniping, inevitably resulting in an idra comment and ban.
"Badmannered"?, yes. "Uncalled for"? Really?
Just curious, does any1 actually know why Idra hates cruncher so much? How did it start? Does idra just hate his play style or something? I find it entertaining so I'm not complaining, but yea seems ridiculous if its just based on Idra disliking his play style.
It's also sad how much hate Cruncher gets here on TL just because of Idra. He's not actually that bad of a player, and if it wasn't for Idra fanboyism I think a lot more people would be acknowledging that. Lol I find idra hilarious and he's my favorite zerg outside korea atm, but its odd how so many people adhere to what he says oO
You want to know why IdrA hates CrunCher? Here's why:
that was an great reply from cruncher without offense to Idras interview, where he said that it will be an walkover...
You're defending CrunCher as if I was attacking him, but I wasn't. I was just spitting knowledge about where the CrunCher vs. IdrA beef really kicked off.
Anyway, I can see that you fancy yourself something of a CrunCher apologist. That's cool. Everyone has to have a hobby!
MMh, dont want to defend cruncher, but actually I can understand Crunchers procedure(dont know the right noun :D). Im also not an Cruncher fanboy but I like idra, but I cant understand idras flaming/BM vs cruncher :o generally is BM bad
So cruncher gets BMed by IdrA in a tournament setting, and complexity gets mad, but in that interview cruncher just joined team complexity and BMs IdrA and they're OK with that. Did I get that right, because I'm only kind of skimming the facts here.
EPT
Can we just have the awesome baller pics as we had before?![[image loading]](http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5838/7wymk.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/d020Y.png)
" to stream sniping, inevitably resulting in an idra comment and ban. 
- 
