| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
If you come in here looking for "anime recommendations" then please refer to this chart before posting: Anime Recommendations (as of may 2014). We also have an IRC channel called #tladt where we all hang out. The channel is on Rizon, not QuakeNet! Feel free to check it out. TLADT discord is Discord.gg For currently airing anime, please see Anichart.net | ||
|
XenOmega
Canada2822 Posts
On April 24 2014 06:24 Spazer wrote: Never underestimate the power of a mangaka trying to pander to his audience. IIRC, there was some stupid bullshit like "the king hasn't even touched her" or something. Good guy king, keeping Sigyn's virginity safe | ||
Spazer
Canada8036 Posts
| ||
|
XenOmega
Canada2822 Posts
On April 24 2014 08:00 Spazer wrote: I largely ignored it because it's barely plot relevant, but the fact that he's even putting shit like this in the manga (along with sigyn's stupid fantasy dream) just makes me roll my eyes. Hey guys (girls), just wanted to remind you that Sigyn is a woman in needs? luls | ||
|
Spazer
Canada8036 Posts
| ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51379 Posts
does this include the anime only episodes? lol i'll never get over the retardedness of Shoyo amakusa arc. "We'll see how my Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki fares versus your Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki" "No, MY Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki is better than your Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki" "OMG they're gonna fight! Kenshin's Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki versus Amakusa's Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki" fucking everyone keeps saying Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki....not to mention the plot itself was stupid. | ||
|
Frolossus
United States4779 Posts
On April 24 2014 10:38 BLinD-RawR wrote: does this include the anime only episodes? lol i'll never get over the retardedness of Shoyo amakusa arc. "We'll see how my Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki fares versus your Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki" "No, MY Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki is better than your Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki" "OMG they're gonna fight! Kenshin's Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki versus Amakusa's Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki" fucking everyone keeps saying Amakakeru Ryū no Hirameki....not to mention the plot itself was stupid. i think that is what he was getting at the episodes that weren't related to the manga kinda sucked | ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10666 Posts
On April 24 2014 05:18 Toadesstern wrote: Watch Episode 3 of Kanojo ga flag wo oraretara Emnjay. You'll love loli Houki. Also at 21:20 is the phrase you've been trying to say lately. Might help a little. She is way more houki-like than the other houkiclone from SYD despite being a loli. Not even Kayano Ai can make me continue watching that show =/ | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51379 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On April 24 2014 11:15 Frolossus wrote: i think that is what he was getting at the episodes that weren't related to the manga kinda sucked Which is a rule that holds up in like 90% of anime adaptations. | ||
|
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
On April 24 2014 12:00 Requizen wrote: Which is a rule that holds up in like 90% of anime adaptations. Yep. Like for example, the first FMA anime. Sometimes the evaluations people give these anime in question confuses me. Like since this topic started with Death Note, lets go with that. People will say that Death Note is really good (other than the second half). But doesn't that mean that Death Note is 50% shit, then? Its like people really liked one part (because the first half was good), but then they just pretend like the second half doesn't actually exist when evaluating the anime. | ||
|
Spazer
Canada8036 Posts
Take Berserk. The Golden Age stuff was pretty well done, and is classic/iconic enough that it's been adapted multiple times. But the stuff after that is rather lackluster in comparison. It loses a lot of the elements that made Berserk memorable in the first place. So is Berserk iconic or not? | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51379 Posts
On April 24 2014 12:24 Spazer wrote: Just because one part of the work is shit doesn't mean all of it has to be. It's possible for one part to be well done while the rest is lackluster from the author trying to milk the series. Take Berserk. The Golden Age stuff was pretty well done, and is classic/iconic enough that it's been adapted multiple times. But the stuff after that is rather lackluster in comparison. It loses a lot of the elements that made Berserk memorable in the first place. So is Berserk iconic or not? everything about berserk was awesome up until the boat. now things are getting awesome again. | ||
|
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
On April 24 2014 12:10 Sentenal wrote: Pretending one part doesnt exist is a bit silly indeed. When differences between arcs or seasons are big, nuanced opinions are needed. What people probably mean when they say that nothing comes close to death note is that there is no anime known to them with parts as brilliant as death note. The larger the difference in quality of parts of the anime, the larger the difference between the 2 sentences.Yep. Like for example, the first FMA anime. Sometimes the evaluations people give these anime in question confuses me. Like since this topic started with Death Note, lets go with that. People will say that Death Note is really good (other than the second half). But doesn't that mean that Death Note is 50% shit, then? Its like people really liked one part (because the first half was good), but then they just pretend like the second half doesn't actually exist when evaluating the anime. Computing an average doesnt cut it when quality varies, you lose too much information. Compare it with paintings, i'd rather look at 1 van Gogh and 1 of my own, then 2 mediocre paintings, because the van Gogh is way more interesting than any of the mediocre paintings. So yeah, disregarding parts is silly, but i can understand highlighting the good parts, cause they're the potentially interesting ones. In the case of Death Note, i'd recommend watching it, but note that the second half is worse than the first. | ||
|
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
On April 24 2014 12:24 Spazer wrote: Just because one part of the work is shit doesn't mean all of it has to be. It's possible for one part to be well done while the rest is lackluster from the author trying to milk the series. Take Berserk. The Golden Age stuff was pretty well done, and is classic/iconic enough that it's been adapted multiple times. But the stuff after that is rather lackluster in comparison. It loses a lot of the elements that made Berserk memorable in the first place. So is Berserk iconic or not? Whether or not something is iconic or not is a completely different question/discussion. Not sure how its relevant here. And I'm not sure if you are intentionally misrepresenting what I said or not. I didn't say "Because one part is shit, the whole thing is shit". I never even implied in the least that the quality of a series has to be uniform throughout, so I'm not sure why you are even going in that direction. I'm saying is half of the work is shit, then when evaluating how good the overall series is, then its 50% shit. Its like if someone was evaluating how good Bleach is, and then judge it based only on everything up to the Soul Society arc. If they do that, they are kind of ignoring large portions of the anime/manga, and not judging it as a whole. Its perfectly okay to say "this part was good", but "this part is good" doesn't mean the entire thing is. | ||
|
Zergneedsfood
United States10671 Posts
On April 24 2014 12:00 Requizen wrote: Which is a rule that holds up in like 90% of anime adaptations. 90% is a stretch, and one would be surprised at how many good anime adaptations there are out there that don't necessarily follow the source very faithfully. This goes beyond manga too. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but the iconic Ghost in the Shell movie was an adaptation of a manga series that is quite different from what the movie turned out to be. Not to mention there are a lot of adaptations in anime that people don't know is an adaptation. | ||
|
goody153
44298 Posts
On April 24 2014 07:02 XenOmega wrote: Good guy king, keeping Sigyn's virginity safe Maybe not good guy but Homo king. Putting the puns aside. I don't think Sigyn's still virgin. They are married so you know they would do it later in the marriage. When did this part got mentioned ? | ||
|
goody153
44298 Posts
On April 24 2014 12:36 Zergneedsfood wrote: 90% is a stretch, and one would be surprised at how many good anime adaptations there are out there that don't necessarily follow the source very faithfully. This goes beyond manga too. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but the iconic Ghost in the Shell movie was an adaptation of a manga series that is quite different from what the movie turned out to be. Not to mention there are a lot of adaptations in anime that people don't know is an adaptation. I don't read a lot of light novels. Are most of them well adapted ? | ||
|
Ecael
United States6703 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
