EPTeven the plot is not that good,
shutter island is better
and inception is no way the best movie of 2010
[Movie] Inception - Page 37
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
Mutaahh
Netherlands859 Posts
even the plot is not that good, shutter island is better and inception is no way the best movie of 2010 | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
oh and I hate french actors... cotillard.. I mean, at first it seems like a good sf movie, then it shifts towards a dark impossible mission / charlie's angels, then it turns to a urban / corporation thriller, then to some emotional last action hero action movie... I mean .. come on ! | ||
|
Setev
Malaysia390 Posts
On November 08 2010 20:33 crappen wrote: I kind of liked shutter island much better. More emotions, and better story. Inception was so much mindless dream action I was kind of bored. Have you ever dreamed a really boring dream, just hoping the night would end so you can wake up? Kind of feel the same with Inception although it was worth watching. I just dont like so much mindless action. I think it was worth watching Inception for the sole purpose of watching South Park's "Insheeption" episode that was released a few weeks ago, some good moments there (and some bad ofcourse when south park tries too hard to diss the movie). Inception was kinda thought heavy and requires some effort to understand, so it will definitely not appeal to those who just want to unwind after a hard day's work. Its a thinking man's movie, so naturally those who are not as interested, like you, will feel bored. Anyway, I think it was pretty entertaining, and Chris Nolan was quite detailed with his mind twisters. | ||
|
Nyx
Rwanda460 Posts
On November 10 2010 21:33 Boonbag wrote: oh and I hate french actors... cotillard.. What?!?!? Marion Cotillard is fucking hot man! | ||
|
Setev
Malaysia390 Posts
On November 09 2010 05:03 blitzkrieger wrote: This movie was really cool but failed. I don't remember any of the characters names either but the main characters wife committed suicide to wake up. Basically even if she did think she was in a dream she could still WAIT. If she waits she gets a longer life and gets to see her kids. If she kills herself she might be really killnig herself or possibly getting back to her real life earlier. So overall that was a huge problem and plothole which ruined the movie for me. It was still a cool concept with good character/story/graphics but the whole reason the wife killed herself made the entire story stupid. And the resolution was kinda shitty too with "youre just a shade" blah blah blah. I suggest you go watch the movie again and THEN come back to discuss it. You obviously had been sleeping or brain-panned through 90% of the movie. Let me try to help you out a little bit. Leo DiCap (Cobb) and his wife Mal, are two researchers. They were researching the dream state of humans, and during this research, Cobb and Mal ventured too deep into their subconscious, hence landing in the dream world of Limbo. Over time, Mal began to despair and deluded herself into thinking that limbo is the real world, and refuses to wake up. (Waking up is done by dying n the dream). So Cobb performs an Inception on her (hence the movie's name), and what he did was basically convinced her that the limbo world is not real, and finally got her to commit suicide with him on the train tracks. The inception was done by Cobb spinning the top in the safe in limbo. However, even after they woke up, Mal continued to believe the incepted idea that the world is a dream world. So, she committed suicide to try to "wake" from the real world. Obviously, that got her killed for good. Hence, Cobb's guilt throughout the movie. | ||
|
bokeevboke
Singapore1674 Posts
On November 10 2010 23:19 Setev wrote: I suggest you go watch the movie again and THEN come back to discuss it. You obviously had been sleeping or brain-panned through 90% of the movie. Let me try to help you out a little bit. Leo DiCap (Cobb) and his wife Mal, are two researchers. They were researching the dream state of humans, and during this research, Cobb and Mal ventured too deep into their subconscious, hence landing in the dream world of Limbo. Over time, Mal began to despair and deluded herself into thinking that limbo is the real world, and refuses to wake up. (Waking up is done by dying n the dream). So Cobb performs an Inception on her (hence the movie's name), and what he did was basically convinced her that the limbo world is not real, and finally got her to commit suicide with him on the train tracks. The inception was done by Cobb spinning the top in the safe in limbo. However, even after they woke up, Mal continued to believe the incepted idea that the world is a dream world. So, she committed suicide to try to "wake" from the real world. Obviously, that got her killed for good. Hence, Cobb's guilt throughout the movie. Thanks, I never understood the movie evebthough I watched it both in english and in my native language. I just was too lazy to think. They should've make it a bit easier imo | ||
|
heishe
Germany2284 Posts
I really liked the plot, also had no trouble understanding it at all, don't know why people say it's confusing. I loved the concept of performing an inception. The fact that it has to be a subtle idea planted into the subjects mind, which has to be interpreted by the subject instead of forced upon it. The scoring and sound effects in this film were absolutely awesome. Cinematography was great as well (With many things I asked myself: How the fuck did they shoot that?) As a matter of fact I'm going to watch it again right now. | ||
|
cyberspace
Canada955 Posts
On November 10 2010 23:00 Setev wrote: Inception was kinda thought heavy and requires some effort to understand, so it will definitely not appeal to those who just want to unwind after a hard day's work. Its a thinking man's movie, so naturally those who are not as interested, like you, will feel bored. Anyway, I think it was pretty entertaining, and Chris Nolan was quite detailed with his mind twisters. A "thinking man's" movie? Really? Every little detail was given to you, there was little to no thinking needed. If you couldn't understand what was happening then I don't know what to say. The movie was pretty much straight forward in every aspect. | ||
|
Bisu-Fan
Russian Federation3339 Posts
Arthur's the best... :D | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
On November 10 2010 23:09 Nyx wrote: What?!?!? Marion Cotillard is fucking hot man! Well, as much as I despise her presence on a screen, she kind of proved to the whole world on the other side of the atlantic how retarded the french "mainstream" gang is, with her famous public tv statement right after beeing decorated by US, claiming 9/11 was domestic conspiracy. I mean, beeing the famest french actress currently in the world, you'd think she thinks before actually talking. But I guess she's no actress and no more than a parrot, only able to repeat what she heard before. | ||
|
Domokan
58 Posts
| ||
|
FecalFrown
215 Posts
On November 11 2010 00:30 Cyberspace1 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 10 2010 23:00 Setev wrote: Inception was kinda thought heavy and requires some effort to understand, so it will definitely not appeal to those who just want to unwind after a hard day's work. Its a thinking man's movie, so naturally those who are not as interested, like you, will feel bored. Anyway, I think it was pretty entertaining, and Chris Nolan was quite detailed with his mind twisters. A "thinking man's" movie? Really? Every little detail was given to you, there was little to no thinking needed. If you couldn't understand what was happening then I don't know what to say. The movie was pretty much straight forward in every aspect. This was obviously coming. "I'm a fucking genius bro I saw 'Primer' and like totally understood it the first run through. Get with it lesser beings." Thats all I saw in your post. | ||
|
Newbistic
China2912 Posts
On November 11 2010 00:30 Cyberspace1 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 10 2010 23:00 Setev wrote: Inception was kinda thought heavy and requires some effort to understand, so it will definitely not appeal to those who just want to unwind after a hard day's work. Its a thinking man's movie, so naturally those who are not as interested, like you, will feel bored. Anyway, I think it was pretty entertaining, and Chris Nolan was quite detailed with his mind twisters. A "thinking man's" movie? Really? Every little detail was given to you, there was little to no thinking needed. If you couldn't understand what was happening then I don't know what to say. The movie was pretty much straight forward in every aspect. There are thinking men, and then there are thinking men. The movie has an incredibly complex plot structure. Bad directing can easily turn it into a confusing shitfest. Nolan worked 10 years to get the movie to be as smooth and easy to comprehend as possible. If you are trying to appreciate and catch all the nuances that went into the design of the story as well as follow the plot, it can be very exhausting. If all you did was follow the plot then of course you don't need to spend much effort thinking. You're just standing in the shallow end of the pool. | ||
|
Chriamon
United States886 Posts
On November 10 2010 21:03 Mutaahh wrote: Bad movie imo. even the plot is not that good, shutter island is better and inception is no way the best movie of 2010 I wonder, how is shutter island better? I watched the movie, and then at the end there is no twist. The plot is just straightforward, it leads you to believe there is a twist, but the twist is the thing that you expect. I'm just wondering how people liked shutter island over inception. | ||
|
FaZe
Canada472 Posts
On November 11 2010 00:30 Cyberspace1 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 10 2010 23:00 Setev wrote: Inception was kinda thought heavy and requires some effort to understand, so it will definitely not appeal to those who just want to unwind after a hard day's work. Its a thinking man's movie, so naturally those who are not as interested, like you, will feel bored. Anyway, I think it was pretty entertaining, and Chris Nolan was quite detailed with his mind twisters. A "thinking man's" movie? Really? Every little detail was given to you, there was little to no thinking needed. If you couldn't understand what was happening then I don't know what to say. The movie was pretty much straight forward in every aspect. I agree man. It's like Buddhism - those monks just sit there all day and try to understand, but it's so easy. When you die you come back to life, and you need to get Karma. Duhhhh! Stupid monks, every detail is given to them, there's little to no thinking needed. If they can't understand what their religion is then I don't know what to say. Religion is pretty much straight forward in every aspect. | ||
disciple
9071 Posts
But you really cant make a "thinking men" movie for the crowds, if its too complex and unpredictable it will confuse the general viewer, hence it wont be liked and it wont get mainstream. Inception is a good movie that is trying really hard to be great, people are giving it too much credit. I liked social network a lot more. But then again, I'm a Fincher fanboy | ||
|
LegendaryZ
United States1583 Posts
Yeah.. South Park explained this movie and my feelings about it pretty well. -_- | ||
|
hmpstr
Norway11 Posts
It's not a great movie. Characters aren't too interesting, not that exiting, and the wannabe "leave it to the viewer" ending is just annoying clichè. A few holes in the story, I think they focused too much on the idea of inception and too little on character development. Thing that stands out the most is the way Ellen Pages' character suddenly is the god of the dreamworld and knows more about it than anyone else, and the viewer get no clues as to why this is. | ||
|
heishe
Germany2284 Posts
On November 11 2010 05:15 hmpstr wrote: Thing that stands out the most is the way Ellen Pages' character suddenly is the god of the dreamworld and knows more about it than anyone else, and the viewer get no clues as to why this is. statements like this pop up a lot. seems like the movie is really too hard to understand for some people. i mean come on. she's the architect of the dreamworlds. she designed every single aspect of it. of course she knows them better than anyone. lol. i gets explained to you in a 5-10 minute sequence. | ||
|
polgas
Canada1786 Posts
| ||
| ||
