|
|
Northern Ireland22203 Posts
On December 03 2014 06:35 TheEmulator wrote:tbh none of those things listed are of any interest to me, so whatever ye but slippery slope man, today its no fisting, tomorrow its no penising
|
On December 03 2014 06:35 Qbek wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2014 06:34 Plansix wrote: Yeah, I heard about that last year. The target appears to be most the whole "Abuse Porn" section of the internet that rose to prominence in the last like 2-3 years, which is super creepy. With the whole anti-feminist circle jerk also being a "big internet issue", I can see what they are trying to do. The problem is they banned things that are directly related to female DOMINATION. That's like, anti feminist. Yeah, don't get me wrong, its a shitty law written by people who are shitty at writing laws. Also laws about what is ok "media content" generally suck.
|
Let me know if it's not something you wanna discussed in this thread, but why the fuck is female ejaculation on that list. Is there something extremely counter intuitive going on there or is this law literally against women enjoying it?
|
and i thought this thread couldn't get any worse
|
We can always get worse, have faith. Consider this a test to see if everyone can be adults and not make this terrible(I have limited hopes).
I would need to read the law itself, rather than some piece that has interpreted the law(possibly incorrectly). Also it will depend on how it is enforced.
|
Its about producing porn in the UK, not viewing. So it doesnt even change anything for most people. Unless you are into that very specific british fisting fetish.
|
That law sounds ridiculously easy to challenge on constitutional grounds but i aint no legal expert, especially not regarding UK law.
|
It would get mauled in the US for being overly broad. But Britain is not the US and they have very different ideas about what the Government can do.
Really this is the wrong way to go about it. The folks that make the sort of abusive pornography they are attempting to deal are not the most upstanding people in the world. Its not like it is a sprawling industry across all of the UK that is beyond their ability to police or look into.
|
On December 03 2014 06:54 Sn0_Man wrote: That law sounds ridiculously easy to challenge on constitutional grounds but i aint no legal expert, especially not regarding UK law.
there is no such thing "constitutional grounds" in the UK
|
On December 03 2014 07:05 tehh4ck3r wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2014 06:54 Sn0_Man wrote: That law sounds ridiculously easy to challenge on constitutional grounds but i aint no legal expert, especially not regarding UK law. there is no such thing "constitutional grounds" in the UK I am no expert, but I am sure the UK has its own version of the bill of rights or similar idea of basic human rights that they can challenge laws based on. The majority of the ideas about the constitution came from the UK, including the basis for our legal system. John Adams was an attorney under the British system before the revolution.
We need someone notoriously British to fill us in. Where is Kollin when we need him? Or TB, he is like an attorney and shit.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
im pretty sure its every english person's right to have access to kinky fisting porn
|
I'd love to read kollin's input on the matter
|
no penising hahahahahahaha kollins not allowed to watch porn, they ask you if ur 18 dude and if ur not u cant go on porn site its against the law
|
On December 03 2014 07:08 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2014 07:05 tehh4ck3r wrote:On December 03 2014 06:54 Sn0_Man wrote: That law sounds ridiculously easy to challenge on constitutional grounds but i aint no legal expert, especially not regarding UK law. there is no such thing "constitutional grounds" in the UK I am no expert, but I am sure the UK has its own version of the bill of rights or similar idea of basic human rights that they can challenge laws based on. The majority of the ideas about the constitution came from the UK, including the basis for our legal system. John Adams was an attorney under the British system before the revolution. We need someone notoriously British to fill us in. Where is Kollin when we need him? Or TB, he is like an attorney and shit. are you referring to common law? That's from like the 800s or something ridiculously old. 1189 I guess.
for the lazy but not so lazy they won't read a wikipedia article- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
there are some outright fuckign dumb laws in place here
|
On December 03 2014 07:50 Targe wrote: there are some outright fuckign dumb laws in place here Sounds like you are just trying to catch up to the US ))
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
i wouldnt be suprised if theyre older than ur country
|
but you are in The Hague...
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
|
|
|
|
|