EPTmm broken?
General Discussion - Page 4128
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
mm broken? | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
pedrlz
Brazil5234 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:21 SKC wrote: And I believe each time it was mentioned why it would work much better in a game like LoL with fixed roles. You would have to force a very rigid metagame for it to work in Dota. Like a carry, a mid, two supports and another semicarry/utility hero? Isn't like if pubs went too wild. Although the system would be much better if you didn't have to choose your hero before the game even start lol Anyways, it would sucks at Dota because everybody just play AP. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:37 pedrlz wrote: Like a carry, a mid, two supports and another semicarry/utility hero? Isn't like if pubs went too wild. Although the system would be much better if you didn't have to choose your hero before the game even start lol Anyways, it would sucks at Dota because everybody just play AP. The single fact that pubs at lower level get the most out of 2-1-2 lanes either forces you to kill trilanes or force lower level players into comps they cannot play. Junglers also fuck it up a lot, do they replace a support, so you actually enforce 1 support comps or do they replace offlaners, which makes no sense a lot of the time? | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:37 pedrlz wrote: Anyways, it would sucks at Dota because everybody just play AP. Well thats just wrong lol | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34507 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:37 pedrlz wrote: Like a carry, a mid, two supports and another semicarry/utility hero? Isn't like if pubs went too wild. Although the system would be much better if you didn't have to choose your hero before the game even start lol Anyways, it would sucks at Dota because everybody just play AP. But what if a guy wants to jungle? What if they want to play aggressive support or defensive support? What if you're playing 2-1-2 and don't have an 'offlane' position? Gosh. What about 2-2-1 if you want to dual mid with CK-X? There's no 'mid' position in that! | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:40 Firebolt145 wrote: But what if a guy wants to jungle? What if they want to play aggressive support or defensive support? What if you're playing 2-1-2 and don't have an 'offlane' position? Gosh. What about 2-2-1 if you want to dual mid with CK-X? There's no 'mid' position in that! I wouldn't mind killing Wisp CK mid tbh | ||
|
Jinxed
United States6450 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:37 pedrlz wrote: Like a carry, a mid, two supports and another semicarry/utility hero? Isn't like if pubs went too wild. Although the system would be much better if you didn't have to choose your hero before the game even start lol Anyways, it would sucks at Dota because everybody just play AP. It would suck in Dota because composition synergy matters in not just lanes, but overall. As someone said, there's CM/CD if you want that kind of play. AP will never be a serious mode no matter how hard people try in it. | ||
|
ch33psh33p
7650 Posts
Don't you dare. | ||
|
pedrlz
Brazil5234 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:39 SKC wrote: The single fact that pubs at lower level get the most out of 2-1-2 lanes either forces you to kill trilanes or force lower level players into comps they cannot play. Junglers also fuck it up a lot, do they replace a support, so you actually enforce 1 support comps or do they replace offlaners, which makes no sense a lot of the time? the system could be made just for more experienced players, anyways. Everyone knows at low level your team compositing almost never matter. I see the problems with the system, but I don't think is that bad, with some work could be good in my opinion. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:49 Nevuk wrote: Why do people want to get OoV on Veno so much? I've never seen a compelling argument but people do it all the time. Role playing | ||
|
rabidch
United States20289 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:49 Nevuk wrote: Why do people want to get OoV on Veno so much? I've never seen a compelling argument but people do it all the time. double the poissssson | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
 | ||
|
LuckoftheIrish
United States4791 Posts
| ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10959 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:49 Nevuk wrote: Why do people want to get OoV on Veno so much? I've never seen a compelling argument but people do it all the time. Eye of Skadi is in the standard situational list for AA. Suddenly OOV on Veno looks very, very reasonable... | ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:55 Velr wrote: Eye of Skadi is in the standard situational list for AA. Suddenly OOV on Veno looks very, very reasonable... DK has a very difficult build order: OoV 6-10 Radiance 11-15 Skadi 16+ | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:55 Velr wrote: Eye of Skadi is in the standard situational list for AA. Suddenly OOV on Veno looks very, very reasonable... Naw man with a skadi AA can practically guarantee a cold feet proc Valve have actually completely abdicated all responsibility for item suggestions in favour of the community via the guide system I think. | ||
|
pedrlz
Brazil5234 Posts
On October 16 2013 05:55 Velr wrote: Eye of Skadi is in the standard situational list for AA. Suddenly OOV on Veno looks very, very reasonable... zeus mjollnir akasha blink #dedication wait it is queen of pain, mask of madness should be core | ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
| ||
| ||
