General Discussion - Page 2287

On March 05 2013 08:27 maru~ wrote:

He has 2 (arguably 3). Fatal Bonds is completely sick.

On March 05 2013 08:28 crms wrote:
you guys suck, me and comeh would have had a better argument about whether warlock is as 'all in' as other team fight heroes or not.

instead you muddled the thread with a pointless semantics debate. Nerds.

On March 05 2013 08:30 cecek wrote:

Dude... farming support. farming. support. You expect us not to be nerdbaited by THAT?

On March 05 2013 08:28 SKC wrote:
It's amazing when every single person disagrees with you and you still can choose to blame their lack of inteligence on why they don't understand you. Perhaps when everybody disagrees with you, you are the one that is doing something wrong. You are clearly smarter than every single TL poster so far.



You said the exact opposite some time before. You said being a support is intrinsic to the hero. So a farm priority necro would still be a support. Unless you are saying he is both, you make no sense.

On March 05 2013 08:30 crms wrote:

nah, while it's without a doubt his second best ability and has some merit, you can count on one hand the number of times fatal bonds actually made a big play, especially in comparsion with the ability of the other team fight heroes: gale, gush, fissure, enchant totem, malefice, eidolons. It's a better skill in theory than in practice.

On March 05 2013 08:34 Itsmedudeman wrote:
Valve plan buff warlock to sell skins gg bli$$ard

On March 05 2013 08:39 Mataza wrote:


Here is a list of 5 methods, we all pick one so everyone knows what we mean when we say support. Stop misunderstanding each other and then stop having a hissy fit about which of these naming conventions is the best. I personally like naming heroes by their power peaks, but that's about the least used of all of these.
Warlock is an early and mid game hero, and sucks lategame.

On March 05 2013 08:41 Kraznaya wrote:


but thats not even true at all massive aoe stun that goes through bkb (with potential of it being a double w/ refresher orb)

plus ridic team damage with fatal bonds

+ all of this is best while fighting @ rax

On March 05 2013 08:39 Mataza wrote:
This is imho a word issue, nothing else.

On March 05 2013 08:39 Itsmedudeman wrote:
Well, it's one thing to get a good fatal bonds off, it's another thing to make use of it with the right follow up without your ultimate.

On March 05 2013 08:45 BurningSera wrote:

Otherwise Carry Necro for example is on po1 so he is a carry rather than an underleveled/undergeared po4/5 support BUT he looks exactly like one because he would be having a Mek/Pipe/Arcane and probably can help to buy some wards too.

On March 05 2013 08:37 maru~ wrote:

Not sure what you're talking about, but it's not hard to get off a decent Bond on multiple heroes (on a regular basis), and they'll melt. Ever seen what happens if you get a good Bond off and your SK jumps in with ult?
It's kind of like Maledict, but with insane range and aoe.

On March 05 2013 08:49 PrinceXizor wrote:

this is literally what i consider a farming support. a character who is not intrinsically about dealing damage, that when played standard gets high farm priority and chooses to spend it on utility items for his team this meaning farm priority above offlaning. you would be playing necrolyte when doing the above, carry necrolyte would be like radiance aghs heart treads or something mean to deal damage. support necrolyte would be running him as a 4 or 5 position.

On March 05 2013 08:50 crms wrote:
using pub scenarios to support fatal bonds being 'completely sick'. Just use pro games where Warlock was actually picked, fatal bonds rarely, if ever, made any difference. Is it a nice skill that can sometimes synergize greatly? Sure, is it a 'completely sick' skill? Nah. If that skill is 'completely sick' I wonder what a skill like gale, or the rock itself is, super mega sick? Fatal bonds is usually just a nuisance that's countered in lane by a tango or two.