General Discussion - Page 1910
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
|
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
| ||
|
duoform
Spain5180 Posts
![]() http://www.teamliquid.net/calendar/2013/01/#event_14511 Why is this tagged as DotA? | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On January 18 2013 06:23 duoform wrote: ![]() http://www.teamliquid.net/calendar/2013/01/#event_14511 Why is this tagged as DotA? There isn't an LoL option for the Calendar. Sometime submissions have the wrong toggles selected. Should be corrected. Sorry to irk any dota fans. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
gniiiiii | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
| ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
ChriseC
Germany440 Posts
some console command or isnt it implented? | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On January 18 2013 06:28 Qbek wrote: What you doin here Neo O.o I lurk here. I have no disdain for Dota. :> Yango messaged me saying people were getting mad because Diamond made a mistake in his SWL submission. Thought I clarify things here. | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
| ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
all problems solved | ||
|
Callandor
Australia57 Posts
| ||
|
duoform
Spain5180 Posts
Tree needs a rework imo. No matter how much you buff him, he feels useless. Incoming Nyovne bitching about he's the best hero in the game. | ||
|
Dattish
Sweden6297 Posts
| ||
|
AkalineMess
249 Posts
On January 18 2013 06:36 duoform wrote: Not mad, just curious. I have no interest in LoL so having it in the calendar is rather annoying. Tree needs a rework imo. No matter how much you buff him, he feels useless. Incoming Nyovne bitching about he's the best hero in the game. When he still has the skill that allow to plant tree for vision, it was useful. When he still has the skill that give armor to teammates, it was useful. The current tree is good at laning phase, but not much offer for mid game. | ||
|
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
Does anyone know how the old 3-carry strat worked in DotA1? In one of the famous ZSMJ videos, 2009 talks about it and mentions that the point was you had 3 carries who were good at clearing creep waves to defend etc. I'm interested how did it work and how did you lane exactly, and why did it work back then? In that ZSMJ game they laned 2/1/2 with some ES/CM roam and it seemed an interesting strat, I'm trying to think of a way to make it work in dota2 but not sure how. | ||
|
AkalineMess
249 Posts
On January 18 2013 08:30 Andr3 wrote: I've been thinking about this for some time and can't really find anything detailed about it... Does anyone know how the old 3-carry strat worked in DotA1? In one of the famous ZSMJ videos, 2009 talks about it and mentions that the point was you had 3 carries who were good at clearing creep waves to defend etc. I'm interested how did it work and how did you lane exactly, and why did it work back then? In that ZSMJ game they laned 2/1/2 with some ES/CM roam and it seemed an interesting strat, I'm trying to think of a way to make it work in dota2 but not sure how. That is the same thing as split push :x. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
superstartran
United States4013 Posts
On January 18 2013 08:40 TheYango wrote: It's less effective nowadays because of various changes to the game that make it far harder to stall out a game in the way that was possible in the time of SMM 2009 (e.g. more expensive buybacks and buyback CD). Wasn't this when TP's were all the same time and not staggered either? There wasn't anything like smoke in the game either, not to mention they were running lame ass stuff like dual midgame carries like SF/Razer and using vanguard/blademail to stall for their carry to farm. | ||
|
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7qlKj.png)