EPTPost your Rig [Will it run SC2? - Page 28
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
mahnini
United States6862 Posts
| ||
|
anderoo
Canada1876 Posts
i thought there was some problem, and I already ordered the gts250 today XD | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On September 03 2009 04:33 anderoo wrote: oh, alright. i thought there was some problem, and I already ordered the gts250 today XD [That's too bad.] The new ATI 5xxx series are getting ready to launch next month and are competitively priced and are going to be much better than last gen based on the current specs. | ||
|
ghermination
United States2851 Posts
On September 03 2009 02:10 anderoo wrote: perfect, that's exactly my max resolution yeah that is true, but what difference does it make? from what i've seen on tiger direct a gts250 is way cheaper than a 9800gtx+ Fail, the 9800gtx+ is on the G92 processor step, like the 8800gts. And the 8800gts is a bit faster than the 9800gt, which is what i recommended. A 9800gtx+ is like about the price of an 8800gts (~$130) whereas a 9800gt is ~$99 Realize that EVGA is actually a pretty expensive manufacturer (the items can be found with the same amount of VRAM for like $10-15 cheaper in other items on the list. EVGA 9800GTX+ http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130339 $134.99 EVGA 9800GT http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130450 $109.99 EVGA GTS 250 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130450 $149.99 The GTS250 is slightly rebranded, although the only different about it is a SLIGHTLY different cooling scheme and stock fan, as well as a bit of a chassis change. $109.99 | ||
|
Ogyusuh
United States52 Posts
Cpu: Intel (R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU @ 2.34GHz Mobo: good enough??? (I have no idea Memory: 4GB DDR3 Graphics: intel g45/g43 express Hard Drives: No idea PSU: No Idea I'm pretty sure my computer can run SC2. I bought this computer as it is but I am not sure if my graphics card is good enough if anyone could help that would be great | ||
|
ghermination
United States2851 Posts
On September 03 2009 09:40 Ogyusuh wrote: OS: Windows Vista Home Premium 64 bit Cpu: Intel (R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU @ 2.34GHz Mobo: good enough??? (I have no idea Memory: 4GB DDR3 Graphics: intel g45/g43 express Hard Drives: No idea PSU: No Idea I'm pretty sure my computer can run SC2. I bought this computer as it is but I am not sure if my graphics card is good enough if anyone could help that would be great Onboard is bad news. You should buy a video card, they're cheap nowadays. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320 $54.99 and it'll close to max out SC at 1280x1024 and down. | ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
i7 2.66 6 gig ddr3 9800GT -> probably will upgrade to current gen later on. | ||
|
ghermination
United States2851 Posts
On September 03 2009 10:02 Kennigit wrote: Just got new rig today i7 2.66 6 gig ddr3 9800GT -> probably will upgrade to current gen later on. There will be a huge price drop in the 2xx cards when the 3xx cards come out, and considering how soon the 5 series is coming from ATI i expect we will have the 3xx series soon. | ||
|
Ecael
United States6703 Posts
On September 03 2009 10:02 Kennigit wrote: Just got new rig today i7 2.66 6 gig ddr3 9800GT -> probably will upgrade to current gen later on. What do you mean i7 at 2.66, we are required by law to OC all i7s. | ||
|
lazz
Australia3119 Posts
intel core duo 1.66ghz 1gb ram ati x1400 i have faith in blizzard that this little toaster will be able to run it at an acceptable frame rate | ||
|
BloodDrunK
Bangladesh2767 Posts
On September 03 2009 17:58 lazz wrote: windows xp intel core duo 1.66ghz 1gb ram ati x1400 i have faith in blizzard that this little toaster will be able to run it at an acceptable frame rate i think you might just barely make it.but your ram won't probably give you acceptable frame rates with only one gb.you'd best add another gb to that if you need acceptable frame rates. btw my rig, Intel core 2 quad q6600 4 gb ddr2 ram nvidia geforce 8600 gt 1gb | ||
|
Kabel
Sweden1746 Posts
Intel(R) Core/TM)2 Duo CPU 2.00 GHz 3.00 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS 250 GB Harddrive Windows XP Any thoughts? | ||
|
dyodyo
Philippines578 Posts
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @3.1Ghz 4GB DDR2 800 8400GS (lol) Windows 7 64bit | ||
|
ghermination
United States2851 Posts
On September 03 2009 21:33 dyodyo wrote: Thoughts on running SC2 on my machine? AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @3.1Ghz 4GB DDR2 800 8400GS (lol) Windows 7 64bit Oh wow is that 8400gs AGP or PCI-e? With an upgrade to that you'd probably be fine, i recommend: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320 9600gso, 512mb, only $34.99 (where can you go wrong?) A 9600gso will trample the 8400gs and easily run SC2 well. Of course if you feel like spending more thats up to you. | ||
|
Teejing
Germany1360 Posts
On September 03 2009 23:58 ghermination wrote: Oh wow is that 8400gs AGP or PCI-e? With an upgrade to that you'd probably be fine, i recommend: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320 9600gso, 512mb, only $34.99 (where can you go wrong?) A 9600gso will trample the 8400gs and easily run SC2 well. Of course if you feel like spending more thats up to you. his cpu/ram can easily support a better one. Just wait till you sc2 or sc2 beta comes out then you can get a gtx 250 or hd 4870 for cheap money, beause of newer generations. Also with those cards you can max out everything very easily. | ||
|
dyodyo
Philippines578 Posts
On September 03 2009 23:58 ghermination wrote: Oh wow is that 8400gs AGP or PCI-e? With an upgrade to that you'd probably be fine, i recommend: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320 9600gso, 512mb, only $34.99 (where can you go wrong?) A 9600gso will trample the 8400gs and easily run SC2 well. Of course if you feel like spending more thats up to you. Its PCI-e. I just wish Newegg delivers outside the US. Well Im currently stuck on this video card since I'm sort of cash plus this is primarily a "work" machine. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
HD - 2x Intel X-25M SSD G2 180GB in Raid 0 CPU - Q9550 OC to 4.1GHZ @ 2000FSB 1.47V GPU - 9800GTX+ OC however this is filler until the new 3xx series from Nvidia is released 23' LCD 5mhz 4:3 Widescreen LG RAM - 8GB DDR2 OC @ 1257 MHZ 5-5-5-15 2T 2.1V OS - XP 64x waiting for RTM 7 64x Liquid Cooling - Swiftech/Apogee GTZ with 3x 125MM 280CFM fan (Seriously these things are like leafblowers) | ||
|
v[1.8]c
44 Posts
On September 03 2009 08:08 ghermination wrote: Fail, the 9800gtx+ is on the G92 processor step, like the 8800gts. And the 8800gts is a bit faster than the 9800gt, which is what i recommended. A 9800gtx+ is like about the price of an 8800gts (~$130) whereas a 9800gt is ~$99 Realize that EVGA is actually a pretty expensive manufacturer (the items can be found with the same amount of VRAM for like $10-15 cheaper in other items on the list. EVGA 9800GTX+ http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130339 $134.99 EVGA 9800GT http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130450 $109.99 EVGA GTS 250 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130450 $149.99 The GTS250 is slightly rebranded, although the only different about it is a SLIGHTLY different cooling scheme and stock fan, as well as a bit of a chassis change. $109.99 You know your 98GT and your 250GTS has the exact same link right? (GTS250 linked to 98GT) On September 03 2009 23:58 ghermination wrote: Oh wow is that 8400gs AGP or PCI-e? With an upgrade to that you'd probably be fine, i recommend: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320 9600gso, 512mb, only $34.99 (where can you go wrong?) A 9600gso will trample the 8400gs and easily run SC2 well. Of course if you feel like spending more thats up to you. There are no nVidia card with AGP slots after the 7xxx series. | ||
Sentient66
United States651 Posts
| ||
|
Dalmation
21 Posts
Intel Pentium 4 3.00 Ghz XP 64-bit Mobo:GA-8I945GZME-RH RAM: 512MB (intend to upgrade 1GB) Intel® Graphic Media Accelerator 950 (stupid onboard) Hardrive: 80 GB Seagate and a lotttt of free space Guess may problem is graphic card and RAM, I think CPU is barely enough for low settings | ||
| ||
