• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:11
CEST 12:11
KST 19:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall11HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL78
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 771 users

first post

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 26 2009 18:45 GMT
#1
journal entry one:

i didn't get hit by a car yesterday.

i won't be hit by a car today.

i'm working on my starcraft site, still renaming and moving things around, and noticed that google doesn't update my site on their search results. it shows the site with three titles, from updates over the year, which is not exactly what i want to show people searching or browsing for my site.

i've got this idea that my site would have a retail location. still kicking that around, computer cafes, as they call them in korea, aren't mainstream and it would be a big risk. i've seen all the big ones around here stick around for a few years and them close up shop. this is odd considering that i'm located in Silicon Valley - HQ of Google, HP, Yahoo, Apple, Sun, Oracle, Cisco, netgear, OCZ, ASUS, and dozens and dozens of other companies.

well, as i said still kicking it around. been posting on teamliquid.net. i have something to say here, and i'm being heard.

rant starts here, skip it if you aren't interested in hearing rants:

being here beats having interviews omitted.

beats having other forums coming down hard on you for being able to lone wolf.

my personal favorite is having the moderator (of another starcraft group - on yahoo i might add) arguing strategy and them removing all my posts after proving my point.

the point that i made that the moderator on yahoo really had an issue with:

a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.
b. the theory that good strategy includes acceptable losses is bad theory.

rant finished

poisonous rant aside, back to the point of this journal entry. i'm still tossing around the idea of a retail location. would that even work in the US model?

your thoughts would be greatly insightful and appreciated.







in the end StarCraft begins.
Jayme
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States5866 Posts
April 26 2009 18:48 GMT
#2
b. the theory that good strategy includes acceptable losses is bad theory.


I really hate people that say this. Even in the context of a game these people have obviously never been in a position where sacrifices are made to win with.

They've also never fought an actual war... but that's usually a given.
Python is garbage, number 1 advocate of getting rid of it.
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 26 2009 19:06 GMT
#3
poisonous rant aside, back to the point of this journal entry. i'm still tossing around the idea of a retail location. would that even work in the US model?


this could use a response.

regarding strategies that include acceptable loss. in more recent memory we have WWII Japanese fighter pilots ordered to take acceptable losses as a winning strategy. we see this strategy in larger use with jumbo planes and fanatics piloting them at the turn of the century.

it's not a new strategy, however history has proven that ultimately it is not a winning one.

there is also the example of the 300 spartans. however, remember in that history lesson a much larger force was held back long enough to halt their momentum, which was the intent of such an action that had a near 100% casualty rate.

going into a battle estimating losses is realistic, however a strategy based on certain losses for your side is a last case scenario, and if you are playing this way i strongly recommend implementing changes so that your strategy has options that make certain losses into potential losses, and even more so a strategy that gives options for overwhelming victory.

so again - i'm still tossing around the idea of a retail location. would that even work in the US model?

in the end StarCraft begins.
freelander
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
Hungary4707 Posts
April 26 2009 19:11 GMT
#4
a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.

does this make sense?

I mean, wasn't it about the opposite? As you don't have stay with 0 unit loss to win?
And all is illuminated.
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
April 26 2009 19:11 GMT
#5
the point that i made that the moderator on yahoo really had an issue with:

a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.
b. the theory that good strategy includes acceptable losses is bad theory.

As much as I wouldn't call Yahoo an authority on StarCraft... You must be trolling, so I won't even bother explaining it.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Kyuukyuu
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada6263 Posts
April 26 2009 20:14 GMT
#6
On April 27 2009 04:11 Chef wrote:
Show nested quote +
the point that i made that the moderator on yahoo really had an issue with:

a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.
b. the theory that good strategy includes acceptable losses is bad theory.

As much as I wouldn't call Yahoo an authority on StarCraft... You must be trolling, so I won't even bother explaining it.


This

At first I misread it and thought that the yahoo moderator was the one who had made those points, but now that I re-read it I realize that you are completely wrong
Wohmfg
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom1292 Posts
April 26 2009 20:15 GMT
#7
On April 27 2009 03:45 Sparkwind wrote:
the point that i made that the moderator on yahoo really had an issue with:

a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.
b. the theory that good strategy includes acceptable losses is bad theory.


Intentionally sacrificing units in order to perform a specific strategy, such as using a small attack as a decoy knowing you will lose the small force, is no different than going into a battle with superior forces knowing you'll come out on top, also knowing that you will lose some units. In both cases you will come out with an advantage if you play well while knowing you will lose some units.

If you were to play so conservatively that you tried not to lose one unit, you would get rolled because you would never be able to secure an advantage in economy, unit count or anything else. You have to lose units to win. These are acceptable losses.

Take for example the GOMTV game played today, Jaedong vs Movie,+ Show Spoiler +
Movie managed to take out Jaedong's spire before he could get mutas out in game 2, but he did get 2 scourge hatched in time. An excellent move by Movie at this point would have been to sacrifice his corsair so that his shuttle could harass without fear of scourge. In your eyes, this would be a bad strategy?
BW4Life!
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
April 26 2009 20:22 GMT
#8
On April 27 2009 05:15 Wohmfg wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
Movie managed to take out Jaedong's spire before he could get mutas out in game 2, but he did get 2 scourge hatched in time. An excellent move by Movie at this point would have been to sacrifice his corsair so that his shuttle could harass without fear of scourge. In your eyes, this would be a bad strategy?

+ Show Spoiler +
In his eyes, wouldn't using scourge be a bad strategy because by nature, you have to lose them for them to be effective?
Moderator
Lemonwalrus
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
United States5465 Posts
April 26 2009 20:25 GMT
#9
As far as the starting a new business goes...I wouldn't take a huge risk like that in the current business climate. I mean, assuming your business survives that long I guess your potential benefits will be good once the market corrects, but I would imagine for every guy that gets insanely rich in situations like this 9 go into bankruptcy. I guess that is kinda the way starting a business goes though. GL, if you decide to go through with it though.
Lemonwalrus
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
United States5465 Posts
April 26 2009 20:27 GMT
#10
On April 27 2009 05:22 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2009 05:15 Wohmfg wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
Movie managed to take out Jaedong's spire before he could get mutas out in game 2, but he did get 2 scourge hatched in time. An excellent move by Movie at this point would have been to sacrifice his corsair so that his shuttle could harass without fear of scourge. In your eyes, this would be a bad strategy?

+ Show Spoiler +
In his eyes, wouldn't using scourge be a bad strategy because by nature, you have to lose them for them to be effective?

Not saying I agree with his analysis, (I don't), but from his view scourge are probably considered a weapon rather than a unit. (I mean, if you think about it, scourge are basically just a missle, although you can technically scout with them too.)
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 26 2009 23:01 GMT
#11
On April 27 2009 04:11 freelander wrote:
a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.

does this make sense?

I mean, wasn't it about the opposite? As you don't have stay with 0 unit loss to win?


you've never played a starcraft game where you lose no units?

in the end StarCraft begins.
Xusneb
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Canada612 Posts
April 26 2009 23:18 GMT
#12
On April 27 2009 08:01 Sparkwind wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2009 04:11 freelander wrote:
a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.

does this make sense?

I mean, wasn't it about the opposite? As you don't have stay with 0 unit loss to win?


you've never played a starcraft game where you lose no units?



What the hell kind of question is that. TROLL ???
If you want to be happy, be. - Leo Tolstoy
Fontong
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States6454 Posts
April 26 2009 23:20 GMT
#13
On April 27 2009 08:01 Sparkwind wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2009 04:11 freelander wrote:
a. you don't need to lose units to win at StarCraft.

does this make sense?

I mean, wasn't it about the opposite? As you don't have stay with 0 unit loss to win?


you've never played a starcraft game where you lose no units?


I know Toad has played games like this, and he is a PROGAMER IN KOREA

Clearly sparkwind is correct in every way.

+ Show Spoiler +
What a troll, so basically you trolled a mod until he nuked everything you posted. Then you came here to brag about it? Nice plan.
[SECRET FONT] "Dragoon bunker"
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 26 2009 23:37 GMT
#14
first - this is my blog, please show respect towards that.

how does one troll their own blog? you tell me.
in the end StarCraft begins.
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 27 2009 00:10 GMT
#15
second

after complicated and tortured analysis i would say that the comment earlier about high risk missions, expendables, decoys, and so on. have their merits.

intentional sacrifice is a LAST resort. this is key, i believe, in improving as a strategist.

sure, plenty of players have great hand eye coordination - but they aren't all Boxers. the first step in improving your game is checking your strategy. if your game went from 85% win ratio to 51% win ratio - it's your strategy that needs evaluation, not your mouse skills, your replay tactic database, or any of that other stuff that just sloooows you down.

the strategy that i've seen the most that results in losses is the intentional sacrifice.
it is a strategy, however let's examine it's usefulness.

1. buys time - which if you are doing is probably a 80% loss probability. if your a pro, perhaps 60% loss probability.

2. redirects opposing force - this has merit - however, redirection doesn't not equal the loss of your recon team. in fact, if you keep that recon team alive, you will be able to gain significant psychological, tactical, and strategic advantages.

this skill takes SKILL. just sending in a dropship with marines vs an experienced player will not result in instant redirection. perhaps an measured response would result. 6 marines = 12 zerglings (and don't start analyzing the math of 6 vs 12 that is not the point). as we've all seen in countless replays, gettting an opponent to redirect is not as simple as delivering forces.

haven't we all seen the all my units in their base and all their units in my base scenario before?

does that clarify what i'm talking about. intentional sacrifice of your units is a LAST resort, it has it's purpose however the intent is NOT TO SACRIFICE. it is to gain an advantage, and part of that is in keeping your units alive ESPecially in a situation where your units are at a disadvantage.

everyone in the world can win in a 5 vs 1 situation. is an 1vs5 an automatic intentional sacrifice? the players who convert 1v5 most often, you know what are probably winning more often as well.


in the end StarCraft begins.
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-27 00:19:27
April 27 2009 00:19 GMT
#16
third

why is everyone only talking starcraft strategy with me? my strategy is probably not updated after so many years, however that was not the point of my blog post.

why don't i start a strategy post for those of you that want to talk strategy.

look for that in a blog post coming soon.

my question, in retrospect, is probably too early given starcraft 2's delay. it's on the table, answer it anytime if you have the inclination.

in the end StarCraft begins.
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
April 27 2009 00:27 GMT
#17
intentional sacrifice is a LAST resort. this is key, i believe, in improving as a strategist.

Since you worked so hard to troll with all that garbage, I'll respond with a line or two.

Every time a Protoss can send his shuttle in loaded with templars, and do huge damage to economy/infrastructure, it's okay that both the shuttle, and the templars are guaranteed to die. It's not a last resort at all. It happens in every game with harass oriented players. You make the game A LOT easier on your opponent when you don't.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 27 2009 00:49 GMT
#18
garbage is edible - can you eat my blog post right there from the screen? i didn't think so.

easy win. so the strategy for that player is built around making that templar drop?

then that strategy is an intentional sacrifice. if i know that templar drop is coming - guess what it's pretty easy to figure out what to do. sure they might be good at it, but how many times are you going to want to play a player who does the same tactic again and again. sure it might give that player a 90% win ratio - however in the long run, if you are playing right, that player is going to be the templar drop guy. and that's all.

sending units is not the only way to intentionally sacrifice your team. repeating tactics too often, being predictable even if it's a highly advantageous position, are all ways of intentionally sacrificing.



in the end StarCraft begins.
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
April 27 2009 01:14 GMT
#19
All I can say is that if you're serious, don't ever try to run your own business, or build a website... Stick to whatever it is that's paying the bills now.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Sparkwind
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States42 Posts
April 27 2009 01:56 GMT
#20
Chef just wants to ban me from my own blog.

yeah, that's reasonable.

in the end StarCraft begins.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs FINALS
Classic vs ClemLIVE!
Tasteless3964
Crank 772
Rex64
IndyStarCraft 63
IntoTheiNu 36
3DClanTV 32
LiquipediaDiscussion
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #97
CranKy Ducklings46
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 3964
Crank 772
Rex 64
IndyStarCraft 63
MindelVK 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 21367
Jaedong 918
Larva 628
firebathero 489
Pusan 371
PianO 341
BeSt 261
Leta 161
EffOrt 156
Sharp 115
[ Show more ]
Shinee 96
ToSsGirL 73
NaDa 30
Barracks 25
Last 15
GoRush 11
Hm[arnc] 8
yabsab 5
SilentControl 5
HiyA 4
Dota 2
XaKoH 510
XcaliburYe356
League of Legends
JimRising 521
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K523
x6flipin2
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor290
Other Games
tarik_tv14855
gofns9687
shahzam401
Happy320
crisheroes274
DeMusliM229
SortOf167
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 639
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 5
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH347
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2122
Upcoming Events
FEL
4h 49m
Elazer vs Spirit
Gerald vs MaNa
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
7h 49m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
1d
Replay Cast
1d 23h
WardiTV European League
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.