|
On January 18 2009 22:06 KrAzYfoOL wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2009 10:53 LemOn wrote:On January 18 2009 10:41 eXigent. wrote: I watched the replay, and there is no way he is a low A- player, he played pretty sloppy-like. Considering you are c- with almost 200 games played, and you took him to a 40min game, im pretty certain he is nowhere near A- level. No offence or anything, just basing my opinion on the replay. You just crushed a little child's dream + Show Spoiler +Edit: The dude barely uses hotkeys for factories, and still has crazy eapm. His mouse speed must be incredible Anyway, I can easily make C rank with 75%, but this season I have actually taken into account all the crap artosis and others have been promoting: Playing the same matchups on same maps all over again with safe Bo's. And its goddamn hard for a 'cheesy foreigner noob' (Idra, 2008) who has 30 different gay strategies up his sleeve ;o Edit: The dude barely uses hotkeys for factories, and still has crazy eapm Even if you were C rank with 75% a Terran near A- level would just dismantle you promptly. Not really. Upsets can happen. Especially if your opponent is greedy and overconfident. I almost won a game vs a B/B- friend whereas i'm D+.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Norway28609 Posts
an a- terran should never ever lose against a c or c+ or even b- player.
|
On January 18 2009 11:02 LemOn wrote:That was what I was talking about. I didn't want to do that, but suddenly a spark in my brain emerges and 'Foregner Noob Gaymode' is engaged, although I have a completely different plan (just because I lose two extra goons -,-). Maybe I am a cheesy foreigner newb afterall 
Don't worry, all foreigners get such urges from time to time. We often want to be cute and creative and then proceed to change our game plan in the midst of the heat. It happens to everyone outside korea and I don't think it's controllable.
|
Im bumping my post because Im actually curious about a good player and not some bullshit like what has been posted in this thread.
|
Silq
62-1 B+
anyone played him?
|
62-1 B+ like serioulsy lol fuck off hahah
|
On January 18 2009 20:26 IdrA wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2009 19:30 Lamentations wrote:On January 18 2009 00:36 IdrA wrote: dont shoot the messenger means you dont blame the person who tells you bad news
this thread does not inform you of bad news, it enables the idiots to spam the progamers. it should be blamed. Bad news, news that leads to bad things. Must we argue semantics? ? thats not semantics a messenger informing you of the bad news is not the cause of the bad news, and so doesnt deserve any blame. a messenger causing the bad news is then responsible and so deserves blame.
Of course it's semantics... It is almost the exact definition of semantics.
I was not the cause of 'bad news', I was just contributing to the thread and even cautioned people that maybe they did it because they got too many messages - we will end up finding out which IDs those progamers are using anyway though replays or something.
I know you might have meant the thread but the canadian poster didn't, and my point about not arguing semantics is that there is no need to nitpick if I don't use the exact literal interpretation of a phrase.
|
Netherlands6142 Posts
I liked it better when it was still Who is Who in Season Two cause it'd rhyme ._.
|
On January 18 2009 23:59 Lamentations wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2009 20:26 IdrA wrote:On January 18 2009 19:30 Lamentations wrote:On January 18 2009 00:36 IdrA wrote: dont shoot the messenger means you dont blame the person who tells you bad news
this thread does not inform you of bad news, it enables the idiots to spam the progamers. it should be blamed. Bad news, news that leads to bad things. Must we argue semantics? ? thats not semantics a messenger informing you of the bad news is not the cause of the bad news, and so doesnt deserve any blame. a messenger causing the bad news is then responsible and so deserves blame. Of course it's semantics... It is almost the exact definition of semantics. I was not the cause of 'bad news', I was just contributing to the thread and even cautioned people that maybe they did it because they got too many messages - we will end up finding out which IDs those progamers are using anyway though replays or something. I know you might have meant the thread but the canadian poster didn't, and my point about not arguing semantics is that there is no need to nitpick if I don't use the exact literal interpretation of a phrase. it doesnt matter if i was talking about the posters or the thread itself, both serve to inform people of progamers akas. these people then spam and annoy them. so the thread and the people that post akas are enabling the idiots and so should be blamed.
and no, most people would not find out the akas without these kinds of threads because a fairly limited number of people have access to replays of the high ranked players and even fewer of them are competent at hotkey analysis. so yes, once again, this thread and the people providing akas are to blame.
|
once the progamers get into ladder a-b they wont get spammed, its ladder c you have to worry about lol
|
ya...good thing you have to be in the same channel as someone to whisper them..
|
On January 19 2009 01:23 IdrA wrote: ya...good thing you have to be in the same channel as someone to whisper them.. They should implement a more advanced /dnd so you could block off whispers from ranks lower than you or possibly from people who you haven't whispered in the first place.
That would be awesome for the professionals I'd think.
|
Absurd = IdrA
he has USA FLag, then admins gave him Chinese flag some seasons ago, now he have got KOREAN flag.
85-36 B+, pretty good rank and record, congrats
|
On January 19 2009 04:12 ArtOfShow wrote:Absurd = IdrA he has USA FLag, then admins gave him Chinese flag some seasons ago, now he have got KOREAN flag. 85-36 B+, pretty good rank and record, congrats That's your proof it's IdrA?
|
On January 19 2009 04:36 Pioneer wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2009 04:12 ArtOfShow wrote:Absurd = IdrA he has USA FLag, then admins gave him Chinese flag some seasons ago, now he have got KOREAN flag. 85-36 B+, pretty good rank and record, congrats That's your proof it's IdrA?
considering people have been naming flash, savior, and stork without replay proof , I would say his proof is just as good as the rest of the people in here that are assuming things as well lol. 
Anyway, here is the link to the replay between OctzerG, and Stork0804. I guess you could compare hotkeys now, and see if its true.
REPLAY
EDIT: Checked it really quickly, and the hotkeys don't match up at all. Stork always sets his nexus to 4, and his first gate to 5. This toss set his nexus to 1 and probe to 2. Later he sets his gateway to 3, stork doesn't set his to 3 in any of the replays I checked. So as far as I am concerned, either it was not stork playing, or he changed his hotkeys (doubtful)
|
On January 19 2009 04:51 eXigent. wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2009 04:36 Pioneer wrote:On January 19 2009 04:12 ArtOfShow wrote:Absurd = IdrA he has USA FLag, then admins gave him Chinese flag some seasons ago, now he have got KOREAN flag. 85-36 B+, pretty good rank and record, congrats That's your proof it's IdrA? considering people have been naming flash, savior, and stork without replay proof , I would say his proof is just as good as the rest of the people in here that are assuming things as well lol.  Anyway, here is the link to the replay between OctzerG, and Stork0804. I guess you could compare hotkeys now, and see if its true. REPLAY I hate to say ive never seen stork look like that(hotkey wise)
|
On January 19 2009 04:36 Pioneer wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2009 04:12 ArtOfShow wrote:Absurd = IdrA he has USA FLag, then admins gave him Chinese flag some seasons ago, now he have got KOREAN flag. 85-36 B+, pretty good rank and record, congrats That's your proof it's IdrA?
he also played nony but that could prolly be a coincedence
|
he is idra because he used that id in another tourneys, and when he was preparing for the estro tourney with usa players, he is him. he used that id before, and im sure more ppl know, so they'll bring you proofs if thats what u want o.o.
|
how about we stop posting aka's unless we have solid proof
|
On January 19 2009 05:06 jimminy_kriket wrote: how about we stop posting aka's unless we have solid proof
agree 100% seeing as how stork0804 is not actually stork like everyone was lead on to believe. I asked dimaga for his 2 zvz replays against 1wlao (possibly savior) and he is going to give them to me a bit later on today, so I will be sure to post those as well.
|
|
|
|