EPT![[image loading]](http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/9610/thesamean6.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i30.tinypic.com/20gm8pi.png)
![[image loading]](http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m176/jozsefs/grr.jpg)
Dude that is way off, the number of planets don't even match up.
Blizzard.com New game announcement? - Page 31
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
Dude that is way off, the number of planets don't even match up. | ||
|
oovv
366 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/2565/444rp1.jpg) D3 for sure T_T | ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
On June 26 2008 23:24 Chuiu wrote: Dude that is way off, the number of planets don't even match up. .................... the 4 easternmost planets bear a striking resemblance to the blizzard image i really really cannot fathom how you're missing it | ||
|
iNCuBuS_
United States905 Posts
Im not saying I dont think it is a new Diablo game, because it very well could be, just trying to play Devil's advocate. | ||
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
On June 26 2008 23:27 a-game wrote: .................... the 4 easternmost planets bear a striking resemblance to the blizzard image i really really cannot fathom how you're missing it I can't fathom how you are. Try picturing the building as if you're looking directly at it instead of how the image shows it. Now you can see the planets are way off from the ones shown in the image (hell they're off even without doing this). Not only that but there are 2 extra planets unaccounted for. Sorry but that is just completely off. | ||
|
lacau
Hungary2 Posts
On June 26 2008 23:28 iNCuBuS_ wrote: Neither Kerrigan nor Arthas are new. Warcraft 3 has been out for how long? And Kerrigan was in Starcraft... so neither character are new. Granted, they do represent new games/expansions, but what better way to depict Blizzard as a company than by showing their three great game series? And what better character to pick for WC3 and BW than the two main antagonists of their current games? And what better character to pick for Diablo than ... Diablo? Im not saying I dont think it is a new Diablo game, because it very well could be, just trying to play Devil's advocate. Not new characters that way mate ofc, but these are main characters in the NEW games... WWI is a good place to talk about new stuff. Banner shows the new stuff | ||
|
MeriaDoKk
Chile1726 Posts
| ||
Bockit
Sydney2287 Posts
On June 26 2008 23:30 Chuiu wrote: I can't fathom how you are. Try picturing the building as if you're looking directly at it instead of how the image shows it. Now you can see the planets are way off from the ones shown in the image (hell they're off even without doing this). Not only that but there are 2 extra planets unaccounted for. Sorry but that is just completely off. To add to that, the planets spin. The SS of the arcane sanctuary is the equiv of folding the US Dollar bill and then saying it predicted 911. | ||
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
On June 26 2008 23:36 MeriaDoKk wrote: does anyone else see the eyes inside the ice? (center) Yes, and several have posted this: http://xs228.xs.to/xs228/08264/ice4_diablo2849.jpg | ||
|
SIUnit
China288 Posts
On June 26 2008 21:41 humblegar wrote: Hmmm those flames (I have only turned this image), tell me that "3" is by accident: ![[image loading]](http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/7175/wwi08logoturnedur1.jpg) But maybe the vikings will have something to say too, like a new mobile phone game or something? That would not require a huge team either. I don't buy the reference to warcraft 3 from the fourth picture, and not the tyrael is lost theory either :p Can anyone find a picture of the lost viking symbol that looks like the fourth icon? Several mention it but I can't find the source (picture that is). Great, thanks, now whenever I look at that pic even in the right orientation I can't unsee that 3 >_< | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
On June 26 2008 23:30 Chuiu wrote: I can't fathom how you are. Try picturing the building as if you're looking directly at it instead of how the image shows it. Now you can see the planets are way off from the ones shown in the image (hell they're off even without doing this). Not only that but there are 2 extra planets unaccounted for. Sorry but that is just completely off. Hmm I can see your point. The lost Vikings link does fit the pattern better, but it's a bit of a stretch. Considering how close both are it just goes to show how fluke coincidences can easily occur when you're actively looking to connect things. Like many conspiracy theories. | ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
just going off those two images it looked like a pretty convincing case  definitely liking the lost vikings theory - unless that image too has some context to it that was left out by whoever snipped the image! | ||
|
iLjh
United States160 Posts
 | ||
|
aseq
Netherlands4024 Posts
| ||
|
0xDEADBEEF
Germany1235 Posts
 Blizzard wouldn't want it to be revealed before the WWI, so they have to make it an unsolveable mystery. Still, Diablo 3 seems most likely. It could also be a completely new game though. The WoW addon was already announced, there doesn't need to be such a big fuzz about it. | ||
|
aseq
Netherlands4024 Posts
| ||
|
Cpt.Cocaine
Canada299 Posts
If it's from warcraft III, then there could be one rune representing every game that will be showcased at WWI, and the presence of the Diablo rune suggests a D3 announcement. This also means tomorrow's rune would be starcraft related. If it's lost vikings, then they might be representing every blizzard universe, which suggests a new franchise. | ||
|
teks
Norway263 Posts
On June 27 2008 00:43 0xDEADBEEF wrote: I think Blizzard is just toying around with everyone. It's all so unrelated. Yeah. Remember the SC2 Splash hype last year? Same thing. They showcased a different game each day, ending with SC2. It's probably the same thing here. The purple penguin-thingie is probably just a random sketch, and the numbers seem to be the ones from Lost (4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42). It's all probably just to cause suspense and interest, before the announcement at WWI. | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12267 Posts
On June 26 2008 20:51 Plexa wrote: just reading the SC:L coverage on this and o.O; It's spelled "Arctic" not "Artic" so that theory is invalidated immediately. Glacier was also not one of the clues, it was Cavern. That guy gave it a nice try though. | ||
|
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
Its like cloud gazing. | ||
| ||
