keep losing games t.t

oh and geoff, smurf rant irrelevant. posting in and reading this thread without telling all the aka's you know is ridiculous. either tell aka or get out. only exceptions are people like romad who know S-class pro aka's or whatever. tt1 did same thing. ridiculous ~_~

Jrwriter

Canada76 Posts

June 22 2007 23:15 GMT

#325

theres alot of koreans where we dont know their aka's

MorningWood

United States78 Posts

June 22 2007 23:27 GMT

#326

inc u said there were ALOT of hackers on wgt beta...i dont remember that many getting caught and the only one i remember that had a very high ranking getting caught was TheMoon[LighT]. WHo cares about hackers at lower levels cuz a) they suck and b) good players will pass the lower ranks quickly and it will no longer be a problem. saying wgt had ALOT of hackers is bullshit and i think the same thing goes for iCCup.

and about ur rant why u would ever bash ppl that smurf just to "explain the logic of it" makes no fucking sense. why u would randomly do that makes no sense to me...theres only one explanation i understand but u say it isnt true....so w/e

iNcontroL

USA29055 Posts

June 23 2007 00:04 GMT

#327

On June 23 2007 08:27 MorningWood wrote:
inc u said there were ALOT of hackers on wgt beta...i dont remember that many getting caught and the only one i remember that had a very high ranking getting caught was TheMoon[LighT]. WHo cares about hackers at lower levels cuz a) they suck and b) good players will pass the lower ranks quickly and it will no longer be a problem. saying wgt had ALOT of hackers is bullshit and i think the same thing goes for iCCup.

and about ur rant why u would ever bash ppl that smurf just to "explain the logic of it" makes no fucking sense. why u would randomly do that makes no sense to me...theres only one explanation i understand but u say it isnt true....so w/e

All these answers and more can be found on the actual rant you havent read.

nony: I am not holding back on akas. I have been sidetracked because a couple of people decided to argue the ethics of making a public complaint about hacking on a ladder with no hack protection and now evidently, the ethics of my rant from a few weeks ago.

Fosken

Poland12 Posts

June 23 2007 00:10 GMT

#328

i posted there 2 replays vs itscool http://www.netwars.pl/replay.php
he's nal_keke ?

iNcontroL

USA29055 Posts

June 23 2007 00:14 GMT

#329

On June 23 2007 09:10 Fosken wrote:
i posted there 2 replays vs itscool http://www.netwars.pl/replay.php
he's nal_keke ?

Yes itscool is Nal_Keke

MorningWood

United States78 Posts

June 23 2007 01:06 GMT

#330

a) ive already read the rant that may or may not have been posted because u lost to a smurf
b) tell me the names of high ranked hackers in wgt beta...plz tell me how they were TONS AND TONS of hackers in beta

oh yea, and posting that rant because u hate hearing ppl say, "omg i 3-0ed u on my smurf" just makes me think even more that this exact thing happened to u. and also posting because ppl feel free to BM u after u win/lose makes me think someone beat u and called u noob or something stupid like that.

tehsex

296 Posts

June 23 2007 01:11 GMT

#331

accussing no names of hacking is the perfect excuse nowadays. pseudo-gosus excuse this way all the times.

iNcontroL

USA29055 Posts

June 23 2007 01:31 GMT

#332

On June 23 2007 10:06 MorningWood wrote:
a) ive already read the rant that may or may not have been posted because u lost to a smurf
b) tell me the names of high ranked hackers in wgt beta...plz tell me how they were TONS AND TONS of hackers in beta

oh yea, and posting that rant because u hate hearing ppl say, "omg i 3-0ed u on my smurf" just makes me think even more that this exact thing happened to u. and also posting because ppl feel free to BM u after u win/lose makes me think someone beat u and called u noob or something stupid like that.

A.) as I said earlier, and even made very clear in my rant + the rant thread, I didnt lose to the smurf. I think you should go ahead and shut the fuck up now.

B.) The names are Peter Paul and Mary. If you are going to sit there and tell me people didnt hack, that is fine. I really dont have some agenda to prove you wrong.

The rant was just that, a fucking rant. It was on situations others have experienced and it is not all that odd for me to find them displeasurable, so much so that OH NOES i ranted on it!

Anyways, fuck off and stop derailing the thread. I made peace with one other individual, why can you not let that stand?

Jrwriter

Canada76 Posts

June 23 2007 01:54 GMT

#333

Ya lol

MorningWood

United States78 Posts

June 23 2007 02:37 GMT

#334

fine. but i still think ur wrong in both A) and B). or at least u are exaggerating. but ill stop now

ShoutAbout

Brazil177 Posts

June 23 2007 04:44 GMT

#335

itscool -> Nal_keke

merz

Sweden2760 Posts

June 23 2007 04:58 GMT

#336

oh rly?

ShoutAbout

Brazil177 Posts

June 23 2007 04:59 GMT

#337

iG.Jussi -> iG.KaaZ

merz

Sweden2760 Posts

June 23 2007 05:20 GMT

#338

not so sure kaaz would have an amazing 58% at C ranks.

sOra

Canada29 Posts

June 23 2007 06:39 GMT

#339

i can see progamers trying new things on iccup but who knows, if testie says they dont it must be trueO_O;;

MoNKeYSpanKeR

United States2869 Posts

June 23 2007 06:54 GMT

#340

MerZ ICCup is actually pretty hard, most of the players are good korean players and the overall skill level is pretty high and even gosu people who would be like B-A range on old PGT standard are in the C-/D range. It's a hard ladder. I know a few people who got B+ who are going like 60% winning (One was a 69-5 on PGT) So the skill level is actually pretty high and isn't so surprising that the best players outside of korea have trouble breaking 75%. As for the hacking, the admin staff is working very hard to stomp it out and they are working on a launcher if i am not mistaken, they are also fair about hacking bans. If your not 100% obvious like live2win's hacker you get put under observation. If you show a steady pattern of hacking you will get banned. If you play 60 games theres probably a 95% chance of you getting caught.