EPTIf feminists were for equality, they would call themselves "equalists", yet, they don't. Feminism implies femininity, not equality.
I think there should be a #Ineedequality hashtag, instead of either fem or masc..
#Ineedmasculism
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
If feminists were for equality, they would call themselves "equalists", yet, they don't. Feminism implies femininity, not equality. I think there should be a #Ineedequality hashtag, instead of either fem or masc.. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18825 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
The wage gap isn't mythical lol. Feminism is a large political area, there are a lot of varieties of feminists; some radical, some not so much. You represent neither equality of genders nor that of masculine pride. This topic screams "misunderstood person" that both genders want to distance themselves from being relative to at all. | ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On February 10 2013 02:35 farvacola wrote: "Are you only capable of shitposting?" Oohhh harsh | ||
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
Protip: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair_Pay_Act_of_2009 | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18825 Posts
Protip: Linking a single act that actually helps men as much as women is not a cogent indictment. | ||
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 10 2013 02:51 GnarlyArbitrage wrote: Hey, I just proved the mythical pay wage is is in fact, a myth. Can't deal with it? That doesn't make it fucking mythical, that legitimizes it as a real and current problem IN AMERICA AS WELL AS OTHER COUNTRIES So real that they had to sign a bill to abolish parts of it and surrounding problems (Only in the USA). Weak ass troll. 2. Imaginary; fictitious. Read a fucking book. You don't sign bills to sign imaginary problems lol | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
The wage gap isn't a myth, it's just becoming less and less relevant. It's a bad statistic because it's just an aggregate without controlling for job types, conditions, experience, etc. but the reason it exists is because there were such societal problems decades ago. Today, aside from in some specific industries, equally qualified employees of different sexes won't receive different pay. What they will receive is different treatment, which extends back to their days in education where young women are directed away from math and science fields, and young men are directed away from things like education. In the off-chance they do make it into those fields, they both receive unfairly discriminatory treatment in different ways. The difference is that it happens to men in low paying fields, it happens to women in high paying fields. Regardless, I don't think that's what you're actually after. I think you're a young boy in search of an enemy, and feminism is an easy target because it sounds like it speaks directly against you (even though it doesn't.) | ||
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 10 2013 03:25 GnarlyArbitrage wrote: The first wave of feminism is okay, I'm cool with that. The 3rd wave is something new. Do you agree that mothers can only be biological and fathers can be only societal? Because that's how it is in France, right now. (The fact that it's illegal for fathers to get a paternity test should say something.) Tell me. Which branch of feminism supports that viewpoint and which don't? | ||
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080731140123.htm | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 10 2013 03:38 GnarlyArbitrage wrote: The first wave, I don't think would support, but the 3rd does. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080731140123.htm http://womenshistory.about.com/od/Types-of-Feminism/Types-Of-Feminism.htm Waves are political movements, not types of political branches within. I provided you a list of types of feminism and those are just the major ones. Take a class. Try masculine literature and a course in introduction to sociology, political science and then anything related to women's rights or even gender studies. I'm going to leave you with that and just move on because you learned to talk through your ass more so than with your mouth and consideration. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
Second, do you read any of the things you link? | ||
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
On February 10 2013 03:47 Jibba wrote: The third wave is partially defined by being difficult to define. Anyone making overarching claims for third wave feminism is going to run into trouble, whereas you can for first and second. Second, do you read any of the things you link? I scan and then get tripped up by cognitive bias a lot. | ||
|
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
| ||
|
Beorning
United States243 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/S2gKwep.jpg) | ||
|
Elsid
Ireland318 Posts
| ||
|
GnarlyArbitrage
575 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/nxeffJv.jpg) Take this image. What do you think of it? Those ladies look a little too old to be touching that boy in his private parts. (This picture is trending hard, at the moment) Now, imagine that the picture was a little different. Instead of two women and a little boy, picture two men and a little girl. What do you think of that situation? If you think the kid is lucky, and the girl is unlucky, you are sexist. If you think both the girl and boy are unlucky, you're a humanist. If you think they are both lucky, well... | ||
| ||
