#Ineedmasculism - Page 3

On February 10 2013 15:22 Ianuus wrote:


Except girls don't have foreskins. I don't see why you're trying to equalise two procedures which apply to different body parts on different people.



If you think drawing unanalogous parallels, making illogical inferences, and bringing up irrelevant points constitute an "intellectual argument", then I have bad news for you son.

On February 10 2013 20:52 sAsImre wrote:
#Ineedtostayon4chan
or learn how to use my brain

On February 11 2013 02:50 GnarlyArbitrage wrote:
Twitter is actively banning accounts the responds to any tweet attacking either #IneedMasculism or #IneedMasculismBecause

So much for equality, huh.

On February 11 2013 03:46 farvacola wrote:
Thank God for Ross Parkas. If it weren't were for his brave tweet "#IneedMasculism, they've moved me to the back of the e-bus", well, I just don't know how men would get to e-work or e-school without discrimination.

On February 11 2013 19:39 Tobberoth wrote:
The problem with feminism is that it usually becomes quite extreme. The name is fitting in this case, because it has sort of the same problem "Yeah we want females to have it better, making them more equal to men... but the ACTUAL GOAL is equality". So the name isn't completely unfitting, but it's "extreme" and misrepresents the actual goal.

Sweden happens to be one of the most gender equal countries in the world... do you think that means we don't have extreme feminists? Nope. It just keeps going, becoming more and more extreme. In Swedish, like in English, we have gender-based pronouns: He and She (Han, Hon). Feminists in Sweden dislike this, because for some reason, indicating someones gender is bad. So they made up a new word, Hen, which is supposed to be gender neutral. It sounds retarded, but these people actually use it to such a degree that it has started to show up in newspapers etc... Fucking ridiculous. It's only a matter of time until people will literally become offended if you use the proper words.

If feminists renamed themselves equalists and became a bit more rational and worked for the goals which actually matter, such as the wage gap, they would get far more followers and have far more impact... instead, they are busy whining about pronouns.

On February 11 2013 19:39 Tobberoth wrote:
The problem with feminism is that it usually becomes quite extreme. The name is fitting in this case, because it has sort of the same problem "Yeah we want females to have it better, making them more equal to men... but the ACTUAL GOAL is equality". So the name isn't completely unfitting, but it's "extreme" and misrepresents the actual goal.

Sweden happens to be one of the most gender equal countries in the world... do you think that means we don't have extreme feminists? Nope. It just keeps going, becoming more and more extreme. In Swedish, like in English, we have gender-based pronouns: He and She (Han, Hon). Feminists in Sweden dislike this, because for some reason, indicating someones gender is bad. So they made up a new word, Hen, which is supposed to be gender neutral. It sounds retarded, but these people actually use it to such a degree that it has started to show up in newspapers etc... Fucking ridiculous. It's only a matter of time until people will literally become offended if you use the proper words.

If feminists renamed themselves equalists and became a bit more rational and worked for the goals which actually matter, such as the wage gap, they would get far more followers and have far more impact... instead, they are busy whining about pronouns.

On February 10 2013 15:53 GnarlyArbitrage wrote:


Men and women have the same genitalia, in a sense. The female equivalent to the male foreskin is the clitoral hood. If you honestly think otherwise, get laid.

On February 11 2013 00:16 GnarlyArbitrage wrote:
Hey, why don't you use your brain to come up with an argument instead of only being able to throw ad hominens? Do you even know what I'm after? Probably not...

On February 11 2013 02:50 GnarlyArbitrage wrote:
Twitter is actively banning accounts the responds to any tweet attacking either #IneedMasculism or #IneedMasculismBecause

So much for equality, huh.

On February 11 2013 03:36 GnarlyArbitrage wrote:


#IneedMasculism because I shouldn't be censored by corporations.
#IneedHumanism because a gender-implied word shouldn't be the standard.

On February 10 2013 15:53 GnarlyArbitrage wrote:


Men and women have the same genitalia, in a sense. The female equivalent to the male foreskin is the clitoral hood. If you honestly think otherwise, get laid.

On February 12 2013 03:03 Mothra wrote:
While I don't like your belligerent tone, OP, I feel strongly that male circumcision is a grievous double standard. A nurse in the UK who killed a boy doing a home circumcision was just set free, despite being charged with manslaughter. Can anyone imagine that happening if the child had been a girl?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2276006/Nurse-Grace-Adeleye-caused-baby-boy-bleed-death-botched-home-circumcision-walks-free-court.html#axzz2KRdoGe56

female human anatomy, the clitoral hood (also called preputium clitoridis and clitoral prepuce) is a fold of skin that surrounds and protects the glans of the clitoris; it also covers the external shaft and develops as part of the labia minora and is homologous with the foreskin (equally called prepuce) in male genitals.

In male human anatomy, the foreskin is a double-layered fold of skin and mucous membrane that covers the glans penis and protects the urinary meatus (pron.: /miːˈeɪtəs/) when the penis is not erect. The foreskin is typically retractable over the glans. It is also described as the prepuce, a technically broader term that also includes the clitoral hood in women, to which the foreskin is embryonically homologous.

Yes, I'm sure that this has nothing to do with all the trolls who are using #IneedMasculism to troll uptight feminists.

Oh god, do you actually think that that is a result of coporate censorship, rather than an algorithm which displays results based on historic search data? Now I'm seriously not sure if you're trolling or not.

P.S. I'm pretty sure you don't know what humanism actually means.

On February 12 2013 03:18 FryBender wrote:


There is no double standard because they are not the same thing. One is something that has been done since antiquity with little to no harm or long term damage. The other is an incredibly invasive body mutilation that usually has life-long repercussions. Yes accidents happen and if you don't need to do it why risk it, but you simply can't compare the two.

As for the nurse going free, that's up to the courts. And you're right if she was doing female circumcisions she would be punished more harshly because female circumsision is not accepted in our society. What's your point?