EPTedit: Oh and in other thread we got another numbers of Terran ( 1 or 2 lol )
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=392537
Every GSL event has had Ro32 terran plurality - Page 9
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Taefox
1533 Posts
edit: Oh and in other thread we got another numbers of Terran ( 1 or 2 lol ) http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=392537 | ||
|
My_Fake_Plastic_Luv
United States257 Posts
| ||
|
S_SienZ
1878 Posts
| ||
|
Jinsho
United Kingdom3101 Posts
CASE CLOSED | ||
|
Qwyn
United States2781 Posts
On January 12 2013 04:47 Jinsho wrote: Yes, because more people play Terran. CASE CLOSED Definitely doesn't feel like it. Maybe because most people don't. | ||
|
derpface
Sweden925 Posts
| ||
|
Swift118
United Kingdom335 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5/Code_S_Statistics | ||
|
NEEDZMOAR
Sweden1277 Posts
On January 12 2013 04:52 derpface wrote: The best players in Korea (aka The game) are Terrans, thats all there is to it. hahahaha I dont even... These threads, no matter how well-writted they might be, always evolve into balance-wining / flaming threads. | ||
|
TeeTS
Germany2762 Posts
On January 11 2013 23:09 exog wrote: Haha so fun to se the terrans squirming trying to undermine the objective numbers to support their view... Cheers with your tears. So you think it's reliable to refer to stats from 1 or 2 years ago, with a total different patch situation and total different maps, to discuss the current balance? Is that what you want to tell us? either way, the thread is totally obsolete, since we now have the first season in GSL history, where terran is not the most dominant race in Code S  | ||
|
NKexquisite
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
DiMano
Korea (South)2066 Posts
On January 12 2013 04:47 Jinsho wrote: Yes, because more people play Terran. CASE CLOSED http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:DiMano You can count how much korean players of every race. Total number ~250  ~76 in GSL 19 ~84 in GSL 13 ~79 in GSL 15 | ||
|
RandomAccount#106470
Lithuania1506 Posts
| ||
|
DiMano
Korea (South)2066 Posts
On January 12 2013 05:10 Huragius wrote: Yep. It prooves that terran is OP despite them winning nothing and zergs dominating the sc2 scene. Legit. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments_Medalists/Race won 36 times won 28 times won 25 timesStop crying and l2p. | ||
|
D_K_night
Canada615 Posts
If we really can't go by the stats presented here - there's no true authority to state where and when the sample size would be deemed "large enough" without accusations of cherry-picking the data to suit a dark agenda. The data can be interpreted in just about any way possible. Let's look at this current GSL season, where T and Z both have healthy representation, with some new and old faces representing each sides. We have P with the lowest representation. No matter what happens this season - people will come to conclusions which line up against what they already pre-condition themselves to believe, which leads to angry balance talk. If we end up with a PvP finals...what does that mean? | ||
|
DiMano
Korea (South)2066 Posts
On January 12 2013 05:12 D_K_night wrote: Specifically with regards to the statistics talk - there's a common thing we're seeing here. "the sample size is too small" - we've been seeing this statement made for the past few years now, whether it be true or false(in the context used). If we really can't go by the stats presented here - there's no true authority to state where and when the sample size would be deemed "large enough" without accusations of cherry-picking the data to suit a dark agenda. The data can be interpreted in just about any way possible. Let's look at this current GSL season, where T and Z both have healthy representation, with some new and old faces representing each sides. We have P with the lowest representation. No matter what happens this season - people will come to conclusions which line up against what they already pre-condition themselves to believe, which leads to angry balance talk. If we end up with a PvP finals...what does that mean? That it will be 2nd PvP final while we had 2 ZvZ and 5 TvT.''The sample size is too small'' buit it is formed by qualifciatons (Code A and Up and Down) where always dominates. | ||
|
Greenei
Germany1754 Posts
On January 12 2013 05:12 DiMano wrote: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments_Medalists/Race won 36 times won 28 times won 25 timesStop crying and l2p. hahahahahahaa. are you seriously quoting 2 year old data right now? :D:D:D | ||
|
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
People figured out that you can force zergs to do anything besides 1a with BL/winfestors. As statistics show, not every zerg player can do anything besides that. | ||
|
mrRoflpwn
United States2618 Posts
On December 02 2012 07:12 peia wrote: this is because earlier, terran WAS the strongest race, ´but until mid 2012 terran has got the weakest (imao) and because earlier there were so many terrans because it was the strongest race, there still is this big MASS of korean terrans, who are still pretty good at the game, they belong into code S, and if you look at EU ladder 10 % terran, 30 % toss 60 % zerg, and also at IPL the race distribution is a big big joke I would say Terran was the strongest race early on only because of the small maps... | ||
|
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
On January 12 2013 05:36 mrRoflpwn wrote: I would say Terran was the strongest race early on only because of the small maps... So they nerfed early game and made maps bigger. | ||
|
DiMano
Korea (South)2066 Posts
On January 12 2013 05:36 mrRoflpwn wrote: I would say Terran was the strongest race early on only because of the small maps... I wonder do you guys watch GSL or only finals? In Code A and Up and Downs always have better results. For example this season PvT:18-30. | ||
| ||
