|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On November 09 2016 13:35 Logo wrote: I'm curious to see how people reconcile Trump being good for the country with the market crashes that are happening & going to happen tomorrow.
When they bounce back and the offshore money comes in Trump's going to revel in the best American economy in years, then it will all come crashing down in 2020.
|
On November 09 2016 13:35 Logo wrote: I'm curious to see how people reconcile Trump being good for the country with the market crashes that are happening & going to happen tomorrow.
"The elites are scared, who cares about wall street, not like they care about me."?
|
On November 09 2016 13:30 travis wrote: things gonna start slowing down as suddenly they lookin for hillary votes in every nook and cranny
"oh shit, we're actually gonna lose"
Don't be surprised if we have a few recounts if she comes up short.
|
On November 09 2016 13:34 xDaunt wrote: How about ever? This is far worse than any other election that I can think of.
The 1860 election broke the country. I think that's worse than this.
|
On November 09 2016 13:36 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 13:31 Toadesstern wrote:On November 09 2016 13:29 BigFan wrote:On November 09 2016 13:28 LegalLord wrote:On November 09 2016 13:26 BigFan wrote:On November 09 2016 13:24 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So Clinton has to win Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Nevada. She down in 3 of the four.
Viva El Presidente Trump. It's really close in Michigan, dunno about Nevada but Clinton leads in Pennsylvania. Wisconsin only has 10 seats, why is it so important? Or is it more for the total seat count to be reached? The point about Wisconsin is that Hillary's firewall is coming apart. She should not be losing in WI and MI at all. oh ok fair enough. Utah called for Trump now. basicly if Clinton wins both Michigan + Wisconsin she's in the game with good chances to take it. If she loses only of those she's out like 99% of the cases. She needs them both badly. She can lose NH or Nevade but losing Michigan or Wisconsin is gg right there You'd better pray with Cenk ![[image loading]](http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1478664685075.png) I don't want Clinton to win, I want the 269!
|
On November 09 2016 13:35 GreenHorizons wrote:Kudos, wish you (and the rest of her supporters) had done that about 8 months ago.
admit defeat before something even happens.why?
|
She didn't campaign in Wisconsin. She didn't even go there this election.
Public polling was off.
WaPo reporting a lot of crying in Clinton party headquarters.
And its the most likely state to put Trump in the white house.
|
On November 09 2016 13:35 CorsairHero wrote: how is p6 doing right now
What about Kwizach? And ticklish?
|
On November 09 2016 13:34 xDaunt wrote:How about ever? This is far worse than any other election that I can think of. 2010 was insanely bad on a local/state level, and that's been reverberating ever since.
|
On November 09 2016 13:35 Logo wrote: I'm curious to see how people reconcile Trump being good for the country with the market crashes that are happening & going to happen tomorrow. it just means people didnt anticipate and price in a trump win. it will recover, mark my words.
|
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On November 09 2016 13:33 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 13:30 LegalLord wrote:On November 09 2016 13:28 Nyxisto wrote: Doesn't Trump win in this case because the house elects the president? Do you think Congress will elect Trump if they have the choice? I don't know, and neither do you. But I do know that it would be a worse bloodbath than either candidate winning. It happened once 200 years ago, and it was one of the most notorious scandals in US history. Can't imagine them going against the popular will though. They did the last time this happened. Trust me, it would be worse outcome than a victory for either candidate. It would taint the entire political atmosphere for the next decade.
|
On November 09 2016 13:36 CorsairHero wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 13:35 Logo wrote: I'm curious to see how people reconcile Trump being good for the country with the market crashes that are happening & going to happen tomorrow. markets are irrational
And so is our likely president; even with the market's irrationality the latter is not good for it.
|
On November 09 2016 13:35 Logo wrote: I'm curious to see how people reconcile Trump being good for the country with the market crashes that are happening & going to happen tomorrow.
Markets are literally just how rich people feel about things. While it'll hurt I wouldn't read much into it.
|
On November 09 2016 13:35 CorsairHero wrote: how is p6 doing right now
We're missing a lot of the liberal regulars, not that I blame them. I'd be half way up a scotch bottle if my candidate had lost to a guy whom I considered to be an utter buffoon and crass joke of a candidate.
|
On November 09 2016 13:37 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 13:34 xDaunt wrote:How about ever? This is far worse than any other election that I can think of. 2010 was insanely bad on a local/state level, and that's been reverberating ever since. and dems will have their version in 2020 if trump is as bad as people say he will be.
|
hey the times are a changing. call of duty starts losing to battlefield. and now this.
|
GG Trump wins. This definitely is a mandate to change things, but I have little faith he can do that. We will see. I hope I'm wrong.
Sufficed to say, we deserve everything that happens to us from this point on. From setting back climate change decades to the collapse in the market to the rising prices of goods and so so and so on. This is one that historians will be talking about for a long long time. I just hope they don't judge us too harshly.
|
On November 09 2016 13:36 Doraemon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 13:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 09 2016 13:33 Mohdoo wrote: GH was right. I admit defeat. Kudos, wish you (and the rest of her supporters) had done that about 8 months ago. admit defeat before something even happens.why? If they had admitted it 8 months ago Sanders would have been the nominee
|
United States42755 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:30 biology]major wrote: Kwark should just admit defeat and not take the ban. I've been afk the last few hours but I don't see how that would be an option. I made a bet, I have to pay out, I'm not FiwiFaki.
|
|
|
|