EPTOn October 10 2016 10:49 Hexe wrote:
Negative question number two holy shit you guys
Negative question number two holy shit you guys
what was the first one
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5436
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
what was the first one | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
oBlade
United States5765 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:47 OuchyDathurts wrote: Lets not govern by emotions! But lets elect a child that is driven exclusively by his feels. I'm sorry that Trump's not a Vulcan but pointing to a 4 year old boy is a propaganda trick. | ||
|
blobrus
4297 Posts
They asked about emails I think. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:47 LegalLord wrote: "You can look at the ISIS propaganda websites" Where can I do that exactly? Just Google it! /sarcasm That took me slightly aback as well. Edit: Marked as sarcasm. | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6303 Posts
Poor thing | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:41 Netscape9 wrote: He is right to an extent though, Muslims need to stand up to the radicals in their community. They already are. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:49 GGTeMpLaR wrote: What a softball of a question of course it's okay to have a private and public stance Neither Nettles nor GH seemed to think so when we talked about it earlier... so at least somebody wants this question asked I suppose. I quite agree with you that it's a joke tho | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:49 GGTeMpLaR wrote: What a softball of a question of course it's okay to have a private and public stance This was every liberal in public office 15-20 years ago on gay marriage lol | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
| ||
Hexe
United States332 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:49 LegalLord wrote: The Lincoln movie was terrible, I don't know what Hillary is talking about. didnt you see all the slow tracking shots when lincoln was saying something really, really important. | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
Blisse
Canada3710 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:49 LegalLord wrote: The Lincoln movie was terrible, I don't know what Hillary is talking about. Didn't that guy win an Oscar for his performance of Lincoln? | ||
|
Chris1
44 Posts
| ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10660 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:50 Aquanim wrote: Neither Nettles nor GH seemed to think so when we talked about it earlier... so at least somebody wants this question asked I suppose. I quite agree with you that it's a joke tho I understand why a layman might think it's a bad thing but rationally speaking there's nothing wrong with it | ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
On October 10 2016 10:50 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Just Google it! That took me slightly aback as well. Considering how omnipotent and 1984esque your NSA folks are, I would suggest not doing so actually. | ||
|
Netscape9
United States139 Posts
| ||
| ||
