US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5136
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42008 Posts
| ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
Something else interesting about this, is that Broddrick's hotel roommate at the time, Norma Kelsey, had a father who had been murdered. 2 years later, Clinton commuted his killer's sentence. Coincedence? Years later, when Kelsey spoke out in support of Broddrick, her potential ulterior motive was used by many to cast doubt on the claims. | ||
Acrofales
Spain17852 Posts
On September 24 2016 12:27 KwarK wrote: Sometimes one person is being a dick by doing a shitty thing, sometimes the other person is being a dick by getting way too upset about a thing that wasn't actually shitty, sometimes they're both being a dick. In almost all cases no real line needs drawing because it almost all falls under free expression/speech or shit we already have laws for. Hey, it's a good thing you're so good at self-reflection. | ||
Acrofales
Spain17852 Posts
| ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
http://observer.com/2016/09/breaking-guccifer-2-0-releases-more-dnc-docs-exposing-more-corruption/ | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4315 Posts
On September 24 2016 13:10 CorsairHero wrote: Paying less tax over personal safety Even Kim Kardashian is now supporting Trump. http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/kim-kardashian-is-suddenly-and-disappointingly-considering-voting-for-donald-trump_us_57e44233e4b0e80b1ba118bd | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11932 Posts
| ||
Antyee
Hungary1011 Posts
They aren't even trying to do their job properly... (referring to the (and disappointingly) part) | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11932 Posts
On September 24 2016 20:44 Antyee wrote: I've always thought journalism should be objective and impartial since it's in their code of ethics. They aren't even trying to do their job properly... (referring to the (and disappointingly) part) That's an edito. And Trump is objectively doing all the things that the editor is criticizing him for, so what you're advocating is a neutrality bias. | ||
Godwrath
Spain10109 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On September 24 2016 20:44 Antyee wrote: I've always thought journalism should be objective and impartial since it's in their code of ethics. They aren't even trying to do their job properly... (referring to the (and disappointingly) part) This is a misconception. Journalists are supposed to provide you with the perspective they feel the public should know about. They try to be balanced, but that isn't always possible. Journalists assume the reader will look for more than one perspective. And editorials are pure opinions and can be biased as fuck. | ||
Godwrath
Spain10109 Posts
On September 24 2016 20:51 Plansix wrote: Pretty much.This is a misconception. Journalists are supposed to provide you with the perspective they feel the public should know about. They try to be balanced, but that isn't always possible. Journalists assume the reader will look for more than one perspective. A journalist shall always draw a clear and unmistakable distinction between the facts which he/she tells and what may be opinions, interpretations or surmises, although, in his/her professional activities he/she is not obliged to be neutral. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
Mercy13
United States718 Posts
Waves of immigrants coming into the U.S. in recent decades have helped the economy over the long haul and had little lasting impact on the wages or employment levels of native-born Americans, according to one of the most comprehensive studies yet on the topic. ... “Immigration enlarges the economy while leaving the native population slightly better off on average, but the greatest beneficiaries of immigration are the immigrants themselves as they avail themselves of opportunities not available to them in their home countries,” the report said. Immigration also can lead to more innovation, entrepreneurship and technological change across the economy, the report found. About 53% of immigrants had at least some college, including 16% with a graduate education, as of 2012. While often left out of the debate on immigration, such workers can help lift overall living standards. “The prospects for long run economic growth in the United States would be considerably dimmed without the contributions of high-skilled immigrants,” the report said. The study also found that “over a long time horizon (75 years in our estimates),” the fiscal impacts of immigrants “are generally positive at the federal level and negative at the state and local levels.” Source | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4315 Posts
The study doesn't differentiate between illegal and legal immigration. Total waste of time. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On September 24 2016 21:30 bo1b wrote: I think both candidates are hilariously bad, and whoever wins is barely going to against what should ordinarily be a "free" win. I largely agree. pesky sad realities. hopefully they come up with some fixes to address it; but I rather doubt they will; as that kind of institutional change is hard. | ||
kwizach
3658 Posts
On September 24 2016 22:07 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: The study Total waste of time. FYP. | ||
Sent.
Poland9108 Posts
| ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
Trump's divorce records with Ivana are pretty disturbing too, including quotes from Trump Jr. Guess he might be as filthy as Bill Clinton. | ||
| ||