|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On July 22 2016 13:17 ragz_gt wrote:Why does anyone care what Moore has to say??!
I've thought Trump would win for a while now but Michael Moore saying it is meaningless.
To answer your question - no one does lol.
|
On July 22 2016 13:04 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 12:59 Vin{MBL} wrote:On July 22 2016 12:53 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 12:40 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 12:37 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 12:26 Plansix wrote:http://www.apnews.com/518de8f555b64357b2501c2ed2469314Despite promising "the truth, and nothing else" in his convention speech, Donald Trump presented the nation with a series of previously debunked claims and some new ones Thursday night — about the U.S. tax burden, the perils facing police, Hillary Clinton's record and more.
A look at some of the Republican presidential candidate's claims and how they compare with the facts:
___
TRUMP: "Decades of progress made in bringing down crime are now being reversed by this administration's rollback of criminal enforcement. Homicides last year increased by 17 percent in America's 50 largest cities. That's the largest increase in 25 years."
THE FACTS: A rollback? President Barack Obama has actually achieved some big increases in spending for state and local law enforcement, including billions in grants provided through the 2009 stimulus. While FBI crime statistics for 2015 are not yet available, Trump's claim about rising homicides appears to come from a Washington Post analysis published in January. While Trump accurately quotes part of the analysis, he omits that the statistical jump was so large because homicides are still very low by historical standards. In the 50 cities cited by the Post, for example, half as many people were killed last year as in 1991.
___
TRUMP: "The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015. They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources."
THE FACTS: The pace of releasing immigrants is driven not by the Obama administration, but by a court ruling. A federal judge ruled last year that the government couldn't hold parents and children in jail for more than 20 days. An appeals court partially rolled that back earlier this month, saying that parents could be detained but children must be released.
By the standard used by the government to estimate illegal border crossings - the number of arrests — Trump is right that the number in this budget year has already exceeded last year's total. But it's down from 2014.
___
TRUMP: "When a secretary of state illegally stores her emails on a private server, deletes 33,000 of them so the authorities can't see her crime, puts our country at risk, lies about it in every different form and faces no consequence - I know that corruption has reached a level like never before."
THE FACTS: Clinton's use of a private server to store her emails was not illegal under federal law. Her actions were not established as a crime. The FBI investigated the matter and its role was to advise the Justice Department whether to bring charges against her based on what it found. FBI Director James Comey declined to refer the case for criminal prosecution to the Justice Department, instead accusing Clinton of extreme carelessness.
As for Trump's claim that Clinton faces no consequence, that may be true in a legal sense. But the matter has been a distraction to her campaign and fed into public perceptions that she can't be trusted. The election will test whether she has paid a price politically.
___
TRUMP: "The number of police officers killed in the line of duty has risen by almost 50 percent compared to this point last year."
THE FACTS: Not according to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, which tracks police fatalities daily. The group found that the number of police officers who died as of July 20 is up just slightly this year, at 67, compared with 62 through the same period last year. That includes deaths in the line of duty from all causes, including traffic fatalities.
It is true that there has been a spike in police deaths from intentional shootings, 32 this year compared with 18 last year, largely attributable to the recent mass shootings in Dallas and Baton Rouge. But that was not his claim.
And overall, police are statistically safer on America's streets now than at any time in recent decades.
For example, the 109 law enforcement fatalities in 2013 were the lowest since 1956.
___
TRUMP: "Two million more Latinos are in poverty today than when President Obama took his oath of office less than eight years ago. Another 14 million people have left the workforce entirely. ... President Obama has almost doubled our national debt to more than $19 trillion, and growing."
THE FACTS: Trump is playing with numbers to make the economy look worse than it actually is. The sluggish recovery over the past seven years has been frustrating. But with unemployment at 4.9 percent, the situation isn't as bleak as he suggests.
Trump's figure of 14 million who've stopped working since Obama took office comes from the Labor Department's measure of people not in the workforce. It's misleading for three reasons: The U.S. population has increased in that time; the country has aged and people have retired; and younger people are staying in school longer for college and advanced degrees, so they're not in the labor force, either.
A better figure is labor force participation — the share of people with jobs or who are searching for work. That figure has declined from 65.7 percent when Obama took office to 62.7 percent now. Part of that decrease reflects retirements, but the decline is also a long-term trend.
On national debt, economists say a more meaningful measure than dollars is the share of the overall economy taken up by the debt. By that measure, the debt rose 36 percent under Obama (rather than doubling). That's roughly the same as what occurred under Republican President George W. Bush.
The Hispanic population has risen since Obama while the poverty rate has fallen. The Pew Research Center found that 23.5 percent of the country's 55.3 million Latinos live in poverty, compared with 24.7 percent in 2010. Some of these are not even stretching the truth, they are just wrong. Or lies, depending on how much you think Trump bothers to look into his claims. Do you even read this shit before you post it? Do you? Yep, and it's completely horseshit. It's the kind of thing that gives fact-checkers a bad name. Here's just one example: TRUMP: "The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015. They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources."
THE FACTS: The pace of releasing immigrants is driven not by the Obama administration, but by a court ruling. A federal judge ruled last year that the government couldn't hold parents and children in jail for more than 20 days. An appeals court partially rolled that back earlier this month, saying that parents could be detained but children must be released.
By the standard used by the government to estimate illegal border crossings - the number of arrests — Trump is right that the number in this budget year has already exceeded last year's total. But it's down from 2014. Trump presented neutral statistics. Why the fuck is this idiot author talking about the Obama administration and judges. What's particularly hilarious is that the author ADMITS THAT TRUMP WAS RIGHT. Jesus fucking Christ! This is journalistic bias (and malpractice) on parade. Yet you are more than happy to mindlessly post it. Bravo. This is the real reason why Trump is winning. People can sense the media "elites" looking down on the rest of us and it drives them crazy. It doesn't matter that Trump will be a disaster, just sticking it to the man (similar to the Brexit vote). Someone on my twitter feed just said this was the saddest and most frightening day since 9/11. Like.... seriously? WTF. I have friends that are Muslim that are terrified of Trump. Like no longer go on facebook or watch the news terrified. Not everyone shares your rosy view of him.
I believe that Trump will be a horrible president. Having said that, the Muslim ban will NEVER happen. He just said that to win the primaries. His campaign manager is on CNN right now backtracking on the muslim ban specifically.
|
On July 22 2016 13:18 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:16 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 13:13 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 13:07 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 13:05 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 13:03 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 12:59 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 12:53 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 12:40 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 12:37 xDaunt wrote: [quote] Do you even read this shit before you post it? Do you? Yep, and it's completely horseshit. It's the kind of thing that gives fact-checkers a bad name. Here's just one example: TRUMP: "The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015. They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources."
THE FACTS: The pace of releasing immigrants is driven not by the Obama administration, but by a court ruling. A federal judge ruled last year that the government couldn't hold parents and children in jail for more than 20 days. An appeals court partially rolled that back earlier this month, saying that parents could be detained but children must be released.
By the standard used by the government to estimate illegal border crossings - the number of arrests — Trump is right that the number in this budget year has already exceeded last year's total. But it's down from 2014. Trump presented neutral statistics. Why the fuck is this idiot author talking about the Obama administration and judges. What's particularly hilarious is that the author ADMITS THAT TRUMP WAS RIGHT. Jesus fucking Christ! This is journalistic bias (and malpractice) on parade. Yet you are more than happy to mindlessly post it. Bravo. Been holding that one in for a while huh? That section of the speech seemed to be framed blaming the administration for the release of the immigrants, which is why the section about judges is there. You do know they can provide come context beyond just affirming your boy was right. Wrong again! I guess I have to do everything for you: In the President’s hometown of Chicago, more than 2,000 have been the victims of shootings this year alone. And more than 3,600 have been killed in the Chicago area since he took office.
The number of police officers killed in the line of duty has risen by almost 50% compared to this point last year. Nearly 180,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records, ordered deported from our country, are tonight roaming free to threaten peaceful citizens.
The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015. They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources.
One such border-crosser was released and made his way to Nebraska. There, he ended the life of an innocent young girl named Sarah Root. She was 21 years-old, and was killed the day after graduating from college with a 4.0 Grade Point Average. Her killer was then released a second time, and he is now a fugitive from the law.
I’ve met Sarah’s beautiful family. But to this Administration, their amazing daughter was just one more American life that wasn’t worth protecting. One more child to sacrifice on the altar of open borders. What about our economy?
Again, I will tell you the plain facts that have been edited out of your nightly news and your morning newspaper: Nearly Four in 10 African-American children are living in poverty, while 58% of African American youth are not employed. 2 million more Latinos are in poverty today than when the President took his oath of office less than eight years ago. Another 14 million people have left the workforce entirely. There's an extended excerpt from the speech from where the subject quote was taken. Still want to defend that hack article that you posted? Got a link for that son? Keep digging, dude. You're almost to China. That literally starts with a paragraph that says "since he took office". And frames it with "But to this Administration." The entire section is framing every single one of those things to be Obama's fault. Which is why the article points out that the releases are beyond his offices control, when the court ruled how long they could be held. I have enjoyed your little section of selective interpenetration of the speech, but that entire thing was Trump blaming the other side for the fictional version of America in his mind. And this is why "fact-checking" is horseshit. The fact-checker can't say that the statistics that Trump used are wrong. Instead, he has to "explain them away" by providing needless justification and context. You're doing the exact same thing that he is. Thanks for proving my point. Sorry the fact checker hurt your feelings by provided context to Trump's states, rather than just rattling off some yes/no stats. How dare the AP publish something that provides more information than Trump did. Big mean liberal media not just telling you that your boy did great and he was right.
Fact checking is bullshit and employment is at 25 percent, or 30 percent, some say it may be as high as 40 percent, maybe even 45. America needs to work fuck the liberal media and their lies.
On July 22 2016 13:21 Vin{MBL} wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:04 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 12:59 Vin{MBL} wrote:On July 22 2016 12:53 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 12:40 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 12:37 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 12:26 Plansix wrote:http://www.apnews.com/518de8f555b64357b2501c2ed2469314Despite promising "the truth, and nothing else" in his convention speech, Donald Trump presented the nation with a series of previously debunked claims and some new ones Thursday night — about the U.S. tax burden, the perils facing police, Hillary Clinton's record and more.
A look at some of the Republican presidential candidate's claims and how they compare with the facts:
___
TRUMP: "Decades of progress made in bringing down crime are now being reversed by this administration's rollback of criminal enforcement. Homicides last year increased by 17 percent in America's 50 largest cities. That's the largest increase in 25 years."
THE FACTS: A rollback? President Barack Obama has actually achieved some big increases in spending for state and local law enforcement, including billions in grants provided through the 2009 stimulus. While FBI crime statistics for 2015 are not yet available, Trump's claim about rising homicides appears to come from a Washington Post analysis published in January. While Trump accurately quotes part of the analysis, he omits that the statistical jump was so large because homicides are still very low by historical standards. In the 50 cities cited by the Post, for example, half as many people were killed last year as in 1991.
___
TRUMP: "The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015. They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources."
THE FACTS: The pace of releasing immigrants is driven not by the Obama administration, but by a court ruling. A federal judge ruled last year that the government couldn't hold parents and children in jail for more than 20 days. An appeals court partially rolled that back earlier this month, saying that parents could be detained but children must be released.
By the standard used by the government to estimate illegal border crossings - the number of arrests — Trump is right that the number in this budget year has already exceeded last year's total. But it's down from 2014.
___
TRUMP: "When a secretary of state illegally stores her emails on a private server, deletes 33,000 of them so the authorities can't see her crime, puts our country at risk, lies about it in every different form and faces no consequence - I know that corruption has reached a level like never before."
THE FACTS: Clinton's use of a private server to store her emails was not illegal under federal law. Her actions were not established as a crime. The FBI investigated the matter and its role was to advise the Justice Department whether to bring charges against her based on what it found. FBI Director James Comey declined to refer the case for criminal prosecution to the Justice Department, instead accusing Clinton of extreme carelessness.
As for Trump's claim that Clinton faces no consequence, that may be true in a legal sense. But the matter has been a distraction to her campaign and fed into public perceptions that she can't be trusted. The election will test whether she has paid a price politically.
___
TRUMP: "The number of police officers killed in the line of duty has risen by almost 50 percent compared to this point last year."
THE FACTS: Not according to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, which tracks police fatalities daily. The group found that the number of police officers who died as of July 20 is up just slightly this year, at 67, compared with 62 through the same period last year. That includes deaths in the line of duty from all causes, including traffic fatalities.
It is true that there has been a spike in police deaths from intentional shootings, 32 this year compared with 18 last year, largely attributable to the recent mass shootings in Dallas and Baton Rouge. But that was not his claim.
And overall, police are statistically safer on America's streets now than at any time in recent decades.
For example, the 109 law enforcement fatalities in 2013 were the lowest since 1956.
___
TRUMP: "Two million more Latinos are in poverty today than when President Obama took his oath of office less than eight years ago. Another 14 million people have left the workforce entirely. ... President Obama has almost doubled our national debt to more than $19 trillion, and growing."
THE FACTS: Trump is playing with numbers to make the economy look worse than it actually is. The sluggish recovery over the past seven years has been frustrating. But with unemployment at 4.9 percent, the situation isn't as bleak as he suggests.
Trump's figure of 14 million who've stopped working since Obama took office comes from the Labor Department's measure of people not in the workforce. It's misleading for three reasons: The U.S. population has increased in that time; the country has aged and people have retired; and younger people are staying in school longer for college and advanced degrees, so they're not in the labor force, either.
A better figure is labor force participation — the share of people with jobs or who are searching for work. That figure has declined from 65.7 percent when Obama took office to 62.7 percent now. Part of that decrease reflects retirements, but the decline is also a long-term trend.
On national debt, economists say a more meaningful measure than dollars is the share of the overall economy taken up by the debt. By that measure, the debt rose 36 percent under Obama (rather than doubling). That's roughly the same as what occurred under Republican President George W. Bush.
The Hispanic population has risen since Obama while the poverty rate has fallen. The Pew Research Center found that 23.5 percent of the country's 55.3 million Latinos live in poverty, compared with 24.7 percent in 2010. Some of these are not even stretching the truth, they are just wrong. Or lies, depending on how much you think Trump bothers to look into his claims. Do you even read this shit before you post it? Do you? Yep, and it's completely horseshit. It's the kind of thing that gives fact-checkers a bad name. Here's just one example: TRUMP: "The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015. They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources."
THE FACTS: The pace of releasing immigrants is driven not by the Obama administration, but by a court ruling. A federal judge ruled last year that the government couldn't hold parents and children in jail for more than 20 days. An appeals court partially rolled that back earlier this month, saying that parents could be detained but children must be released.
By the standard used by the government to estimate illegal border crossings - the number of arrests — Trump is right that the number in this budget year has already exceeded last year's total. But it's down from 2014. Trump presented neutral statistics. Why the fuck is this idiot author talking about the Obama administration and judges. What's particularly hilarious is that the author ADMITS THAT TRUMP WAS RIGHT. Jesus fucking Christ! This is journalistic bias (and malpractice) on parade. Yet you are more than happy to mindlessly post it. Bravo. This is the real reason why Trump is winning. People can sense the media "elites" looking down on the rest of us and it drives them crazy. It doesn't matter that Trump will be a disaster, just sticking it to the man (similar to the Brexit vote). Someone on my twitter feed just said this was the saddest and most frightening day since 9/11. Like.... seriously? WTF. I have friends that are Muslim that are terrified of Trump. Like no longer go on facebook or watch the news terrified. Not everyone shares your rosy view of him. I believe that Trump will be a horrible president. Having said that, the Muslim ban will NEVER happen. He just said that to win the primaries. His campaign manager is on CNN right now backtracking on the muslim ban specifically.
You will see alot of backtracking of this nature as he molds himself to become more appealing for the general election.
His base voluntary pretends to have the memory of a goldfish and the double down is even stronger with them than with Trump so him moving more center is a natural move.
|
On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here.
Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there.
|
On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there.
I don't agree but I think it would have been a lot closer than Trump Clinton will be.
|
On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there.
Sometimes people just cant math.
How is Sanders going to beat Trump when he cant beat Hillary even by popular vote metrics. And if someone points out independants and dems who would rather vote Trump over Hillary in the absence of Sanders as a defining factor needs to get their head checked honestly.
|
On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there.
Hillary just had her worst week recently. Trump is having his best.
Something has to change for him to win. But he's a 70 year old narcissist, so nothing will.
|
On July 22 2016 13:25 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there. Sometimes people just cant math. How is Sanders going to beat Trump when he cant beat Hillary even by popular vote metrics. And if someone points out independants and dems who would rather vote Trump over Hillary in the absence of Sanders as a defining factor needs to get their head checked honestly. Sanders had better favourability ratings than either trump or clinton.Plus his similar views to Trump in opposing free trade deals would have seen him win back many of the blue collar dems who have gone to Trump.
Thats how i see it anyway.
|
On July 22 2016 13:26 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there. Hillary just had her worst week recently. Trump is having his best. Something has to change for him to win. But he's a 70 year old narcissist, so nothing will. When the televised debates kick off Clinton will have far worse weeks than recently.
|
On July 22 2016 13:29 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:25 Rebs wrote:On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there. Sometimes people just cant math. How is Sanders going to beat Trump when he cant beat Hillary even by popular vote metrics. And if someone points out independants and dems who would rather vote Trump over Hillary in the absence of Sanders as a defining factor needs to get their head checked honestly. Sanders had better favourability ratings than either trump or clinton.Plus his similar views to Trump in opposing free trade deals would have seen him win back many of the blue collar dems who have gone to Trump. Thats how i see it anyway.
Sanders doesn't have the insider/establishment problem that Clinton has. That alone plus not being Trump is enough for him to easily win.
Unfortunately, Clinton has no charisma and just seems like a puppet. She really needs Obama to help her campaign.
|
On July 22 2016 13:19 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Im not going to vote in the poll but it should have included 3rd party candidates Stein and Johnson.
Johnson is polling at 10%, I'll bet you my sig that the Greens and Libertarians won't get more than 3% come elections. I wanted a more representative poll.
|
On July 22 2016 13:31 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:26 Introvert wrote:On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there. Hillary just had her worst week recently. Trump is having his best. Something has to change for him to win. But he's a 70 year old narcissist, so nothing will. When the televised debates kick off Clinton will have far worse weeks than recently. Yeah, cause trump is good off the cuff and Clinton has zero debate experience.
|
Canada11363 Posts
Oh wow. Is this a Southern Baptist preacher?
|
United States42988 Posts
On July 22 2016 10:59 Lord Tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 10:59 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 10:56 Nyxisto wrote:On July 22 2016 10:53 xDaunt wrote:On July 22 2016 10:49 biology]major wrote:On July 22 2016 10:48 Plansix wrote:On July 22 2016 10:46 acker wrote:On July 22 2016 10:41 biology]major wrote: I disagree, he's employing a bluff or a threat to create a change in the defense spending of countries in NATO who don't put any money towards military and just rely on the USA to protect them. We have all of the control in this pact because we have by far the largest military, so we should negotiate with that in mind and get the rest to step up. By always having leaders of US say they will stand with NATO no matter what, some of the countries have been taking the protection the USA has to offer for granted. I could be wrong but that's how I see it, NATO is a combined effort, but it is basically like 4 countries that even have the capacity to do anything. If it's a bluff, it's a really stupid one. NATO consists of a few countries rich enough to afford first-rate armies and a lot of poor countries geographically situated to serve as ballistic missile platforms, docks, and air bases. Nobody cares if some Eastern European country doesn't give NATO a handful of old MiGs every year. The land is more important. Trump ends our agreement with nato, nato countries evict all our military bases and nukes. You think those countries would really let go of our protection? lmao. This. If there is no definite NATO guarantee there is no protection. That's the point of the alliance. The assurance is the protection No, what would happen is that NATO would be replaced with a new treaty regime that is more favorable to the US. ...and that would be??? They'd all just develop independent nuclear deterrents. Nobody fucks with a nuclear state, Estonia is a match for Russia if they can level St Petersburg. What a time to be alive.
|
On July 22 2016 13:31 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:26 Introvert wrote:On July 22 2016 13:23 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On July 22 2016 13:19 Introvert wrote:First, it wasn't just lefties that were saying that. Second of all, the first was driven by the belief that, despite the polls, he wouldn't win. Remember when Trump cult members were bragging about polls throughout the primaries. Where are they now? They don't really need to say anything at this stage. Clinton has gone from a 14 point lead head to head three months ago to the polls being neck and neck now. Voters trust in Clinton took a huge hit with the email scandal.I agree with Moore, she can't recover from here. Sanders would have beaten Trump easily, I think we are all in agreement there. Hillary just had her worst week recently. Trump is having his best. Something has to change for him to win. But he's a 70 year old narcissist, so nothing will. When the televised debates kick off Clinton will have far worse weeks than recently.
They will both sink like rocks, no one wants to hear from them.
|
On July 22 2016 13:12 FiWiFaKi wrote:Poll: Of the two, Trump or Hillary for President?Hillary (33) 52% Trump (30) 48% 63 total votes Your vote: Of the two, Trump or Hillary for President? (Vote): Trump (Vote): Hillary
Well that's fascinating. I mean it's a tiny sample, but still.
|
On July 22 2016 13:36 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:12 FiWiFaKi wrote:Poll: Of the two, Trump or Hillary for President?Hillary (33) 52% Trump (30) 48% 63 total votes Your vote: Of the two, Trump or Hillary for President? (Vote): Trump (Vote): Hillary
Well that's fascinating. I mean it's a tiny sample, but still.
Normally it's like 20 to 5 all the Clinton supporters must be asleep
|
On July 22 2016 12:57 GGTeMpLaR wrote: So I was unable to watch today's RNC. How did Day 4 compare to the other days?
And if anyone watched it in twitchchat, how did it take Ivanka and Trump's speeches? Best day yet. Twitch chat reaction to Ivanka went as expected.
|
On July 22 2016 13:41 CorsairHero wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 12:57 GGTeMpLaR wrote: So I was unable to watch today's RNC. How did Day 4 compare to the other days?
And if anyone watched it in twitchchat, how did it take Ivanka and Trump's speeches? Best day yet. Twitch chat reaction to Ivanka went as expected.
So it was just kreygasm spam? xD
|
On July 22 2016 13:43 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 13:41 CorsairHero wrote:On July 22 2016 12:57 GGTeMpLaR wrote: So I was unable to watch today's RNC. How did Day 4 compare to the other days?
And if anyone watched it in twitchchat, how did it take Ivanka and Trump's speeches? Best day yet. Twitch chat reaction to Ivanka went as expected. So it was just kreygasm spam? xD Yes haha. Ivanka came out to hear comes the sun xD You should check out the speakers from Thiel onwards.
Also infowars vs TYT altercation happened lol
|
|
|
|