EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 4393
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:29 LegalLord wrote: If the Republican party became Trump's version of it after the end of this election... I think that would be a net positive for the US as a whole. You do realize he hijacked the party as a virtual non-Republican right | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:31 Doodsmack wrote: You do realize he hijacked the party as a virtual non-Republican right Absolutely. But he found enough support to push him ahead of the normal Republican candidates so it might happen. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:22 Plansix wrote: Won't matter. Ivanka's going to be able to go around saying whatever she wants, it doesn't have to be congruent with whatever Trump's saying at all. While Trump's appeal is limited to party lines mostly, Ivanka is about to demolish Hillary's male numbers. I guarantee you, by tomorrow morning every male chauvinist jerk is going to have the video of Ivanka on their feed knowing what she said is the antithesis to much of what Trump and they purport to support saying "See Trump's better than Hillary!" A bunch of low information voters are going to believe that so long as she keeps selling it. She knows how invaluable she is to Trump winning, and it wouldn't surprise me one bit to find out she's been leveraging her full campaign support for more power/responsibility instead of Jr. I don't know how the cognitive dissonance won't cause mass cranial ruptures across the country but man, Hillary is going to have absolutely nothing to run on other than "I'm not Trump", to which his response will be "You sure the hell aren't, you're more of the same status quo political bullshit we all hate" and that's going to kill. So far this speech gives me the impression he just might be able to keep the facade of capability up (for the low information/loyal supporters) long enough to really f'in do this. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:34 LegalLord wrote: Ohhhh shit he's going after Hillary's actual FP record and not just Benghazi. Of course, everyone around here is well-educated on these points by now given my diligent work.  | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:33 GreenHorizons wrote: Won't matter. Ivanka's going to be able to go around saying whatever she wants, it doesn't have to be congruent with whatever Trump's saying at all. While Trump's appeal is limited to party lines mostly, Ivanka is about to demolish Hillary's male numbers. I guarantee you, by tomorrow morning every male chauvinist jerk is going to have the video of Ivanka on their feed knowing what she said is the antithesis to much of what Trump and they purport to support saying "See Trump's better than Hillary!" A bunch of low information voters are going to believe that so long as she keeps selling it. She knows how invaluable she is to Trump winning, and it wouldn't surprise me one bit to find out she's been leveraging her full campaign support for more power/responsibility instead of Jr. I don't know how the cognitive dissonance won't cause mass cranial ruptures across the country but man, Hillary is going to have absolutely nothing to run on other than "I'm not Trump", to which his response will be "You sure the hell aren't, you're more of the same status quo political bullshit we all hate" and that's going to kill. So far this speech gives me the impression he just might be able to keep the facade of capability up (for the low information/loyal supporters) long enough to really f'in do this. Not sure I would place so much stock in Ivanka. Trump is still a nut with some bad poll numbers. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
If it happens, democrats only have themselves to blame. It is quite embarrassing that they would field a candidate as weak as clinton when so much is at stake. Putting politics before service. It's a disgrace. | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:37 Plansix wrote: https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/756314822866640897 why not just say that yourself instead of posting a random person's twitter | ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:36 Doodsmack wrote: Not sure I would place so much stock in Ivanka. Trump is still a nut with some bad poll numbers. Hes been going up for 2 months (since the judge comments) and the odds have shifted towards Trump noticeably since the last round of betting in this thread. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:38 Vin{MBL} wrote: Oh my god. I think Donald Trump is actually going to win. If it happens, democrats only have themselves to blame. It is quite embarrassing that they would field a candidate as weak is clinton when so much is at stake. Putting politics before service. It's a disgrace. I could see by DNC 2012 that Obama was the best that the Democrats have and will have in the near future. Problem is I hate the Republican party, and it is pretty antithetical to everything that Trump is talking about right now. | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9245 Posts
On July 22 2016 11:39 biology]major wrote: why not just say that yourself instead of posting a random person's twitter Because that would be plagiarism, haven't you seen the news this week | ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
| ||
