In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!
NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
No, we really don't care all that much. It'd be nice if you guys stopped saying things that make me roll my eyes though, my sockets are beginning to ache.
On March 27 2016 05:31 Toadesstern wrote: wasn't there some time ago I think? whatever it's fine now
It wasn't and still isn't on MSNBC
Right there on the front page, second article.
Yeah, because we all know the real top headline from today is this...
But you can see them pay attention to the percentage of vote in like you didn't see them do with Arizona (and still arent' mentioning they have it listed still as "79% in".
Maybe if Ticklish kept his eyes on whats happening instead of trying to divert them into his skull so much they wouldn't be so sore?
UPDATE: Hillary flirting with losing viability in Alaska.
On March 27 2016 05:31 Toadesstern wrote: wasn't there some time ago I think? whatever it's fine now
It wasn't and still isn't on MSNBC
Right there on the front page, second article.
Yeah, because we all know the real top headline from today is this...
But you can see them pay attention to the percentage of vote in like you didn't see them do with Arizona (and still arent' mentioning they have it listed still as "79% in".
Maybe if Ticklish kept his eyes on whats happening instead of trying to divert them into his skull so much they wouldn't be so sore?
UPDATE: Hillary flirting with losing viability in Alaska.
Moving goalposts again? You said it was not on MSNBC.
On March 27 2016 05:31 Toadesstern wrote: wasn't there some time ago I think? whatever it's fine now
It wasn't and still isn't on MSNBC
Right there on the front page, second article.
Yeah, because we all know the real top headline from today is this...
But you can see them pay attention to the percentage of vote in like you didn't see them do with Arizona (and still arent' mentioning they have it listed still as "79% in".
Maybe if Ticklish kept his eyes on whats happening instead of trying to divert them into his skull so much they wouldn't be so sore?
UPDATE: Hillary flirting with losing viability in Alaska.
Moving goalposts again? You said it was not on MSNBC.
It is.
Maybe he was just mistaken? He edited his post after you corrected him.
Well I realized people would confuse the story with the standard graphics (like Gor just did) but I don't have a screen shot of what that typically looks like.
EDIT: Example of what CNN got up about the same time it was brought up about the other sites
The thing in the top left is what I was talking about.
As they watch every tick of % in remember they never talked about what happened with Arizona or that they still only have "79%"
We can't look at any one thing in isolation and expect it to single handedly prove the point though.
EDIT2: Not sure if we won't get any exit polls again but I did my own informal one at my location and Bernie won black voters 2:1 Almost every under 45ish Black person was for Bernie almost all of Hillary's black voters were over 45.
So far WA has had the shortest lines and most efficient caucuses as another fyi.
A top strategist for Ohio Gov. John Kasich accused Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s campaign on Friday of being “disingenuous” about discussions between the two GOP rivals over how best to deny Donald Trump the required 1,237 delegates need to win the Republican presidential nomination.
Cruz has questioned Kasich's motivations for staying in the race, accusing him of playing the role of "spoiler" because it is mathematically impossible for the Ohio governor to win the nomination outright. "A vote for John Kasich is a vote for Donald Trump," Cruz told reporters on Saturday.
The Kasich campaign, meanwhile, is open about its intention to duke it out at the convention in Cleveland, and insists that upcoming contests like Pennsylvania make for favorable terrain.
A detailed analysis published Friday on the prediction website FiveThirtyEight.com supports the case for cooperation, arguing that only by working together can Cruz and Kasich stop Trump.
Bernie cleaning up in washington and alaska with big margins.
Next big state is new york, where I am. An informal poll amongst my "millennial" friends shows Bernie with a lot of strength here. It's exciting as a new yorker to think my vote might make a difference in a national election for once.
Is H expected to win her "home" state? I haven't seen any polls.
On March 27 2016 07:39 LegalLord wrote: Polls say Hillary is strongly favored in NY. Demonizing Wall Street doesn't go over well on Wall Street, obviously.
No doubt she'll clean up on Wall Street. Lucky for us, the natures of concentration of wealth and democracy lean in our favor.
So apparently there is a video of Chelsea Clinton telling a rally that a Clinton administration would undo parts of the ACA... Going so far as bashing Obamacare.
"So Ted Cruz attacked Melania, Trump said he'd spill the beans on Heidi, and this gets spun into the usual narrative that Trump's a huge bully."
pretty much, the media so biased its not even funny anymore. They have an agenda, and that is to make trump look as bad as possible. Now they are on a tirade of how trump hates females. If one realizes who trump is, nobody is off-limits to being attacked (more than 90% its him responding to an attack) , but apparently if its a woman he attacks he will be called sexist.
Remember when he called hillary low energy and doesn't have the stamina for the job?, The cnn ran a story of how that's typical sexist trump with a bunch of pundits. But apparently when he called Jeb bush low energy thats not sexist. The bottom line is, trump will go after you no matter the race or gender. To single him out as a female hater is just the latest narrative. Next week it will be something new and it will go on and on.
it is totally unfair to say something negative about him, because he really has totally normal hands, you could even say that they are bigger than normal since he buys slightly smaller than large gloves. there is nothing wrong with them. seriously, let me show you. and when i meet people they all say that i have really nice hands, wouldn't you agree?