EPTOn February 12 2016 12:52 IgnE wrote:
Typical Clinton identity politics bullshit.
Typical Clinton identity politics bullshit.
Yeah, I was just about to make a post about devising a drinking game for whenever Clinton uses identity politics.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2900
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Yeah, I was just about to make a post about devising a drinking game for whenever Clinton uses identity politics. | ||
GTR
51692 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46424 Posts
| ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
On February 12 2016 12:49 GreenHorizons wrote: "One of us ran against Obama and it wasn't me" Wrekt BOOM | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
The "ran against him line" was dumb. Come on, she ran against him for president when he was a senator, not when he was an incumbent. Sanders has improved somewhat on foreign policy which is good. Apart from that, I remain unimpressed with his platform. I think in a couple debates where the candidates really grow into their own it's going to be really great debating. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
On the other hand, I thought Bernie shined from about 20 minutes in till the end. Really think it was by FAR his best debate, and made me even more excited for his candidacy. I know i'm biased, but I recognized that his early performances weren't great... this was. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
On February 12 2016 12:59 ticklishmusic wrote: Hillary did pretty good IMO, she's figuring out angles that work. The "ran against him line" was dumb. Come on, she ran against him for president when he was a senator, not when he was an incumbent. Sanders has improved somewhat on foreign policy which is good. Apart from that, I remain unimpressed with his platform. You notice the Hillary camp is already trying to downplay Nevada, claiming it's 80% white (it's not)? Good reason they haven't polled there either. Basically, Hillary's claims in Nevada was mostly bluster. It's generational like the rest of her support. It's going to be close which is not what Hillary needs. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On February 12 2016 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote: You notice the Hillary camp is already trying to downplay Nevada, claiming it's 80% white (it's not)? Good reason they haven't polled there either. Basically, Hillary's claims in Nevada was mostly bluster. It's generational like the rest of her support. It's going to be close which is not what Hillary needs. *shrug* your interpretation different tune from a couple days ago when you seemed convinced bernie would sweep NV and SC | ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
Downplaying expectations is classic politics when you're ahead. It's quite clear what Clinton's campaign is trying to do | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
GH was commenting on "Nevada is gonna be close so Hillary is downplaying it". Maybe I assumed wrongly what he meant, if so my bad. | ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
The 20th is my birthday, so maybe i'll get a nice surprise  | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
I wish you the best of cakedays, but as a bit of good natured ribbing I will say it's too bad you're only 20 because you won't be able to (legally) drink to Hillary's victory.  | ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States44287 Posts
That's the kind of maths people should learn. A calculator can solve the problem, teach the kids to understand the problem. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On February 12 2016 13:41 darthfoley wrote: No i'm actually gonna be 21, so i can drink to Bernie's impending communist revolution ![[image loading]](https://cdn-shop.threadless.com/products/383/636x460design_01.jpg) On February 12 2016 13:49 KwarK wrote: I'm ten pages late because I was out hiking today instead of shitposting in this topic at work but Common Core maths is exactly how maths work in my head. It makes much more sense to teach people how to break up and manipulate numbers so that any numbers, be them decimals, fractions, negatives etc work just as easily as >0 <100 integers. Times tables are a memory exercise and a useful tool but extremely limited in scope. Being able to recite that 12x12 is 144 is all well and good but being able to instantly break 13x13 into 13x10 + 10x3 + 3x3 is way more useful. That's the kind of maths people should learn. A calculator can solve the problem, teach the kids to understand the problem. this is how chinese people learn maths. it was my secret weapon and was better than a calculator. | ||
| ||
