Staring at breasts increases heart health - Page 3
Forum Index > Closed |
MetalMarine
United States1559 Posts
| ||
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On March 07 2011 05:53 Latham wrote: so the meme "tits or gtfo" can now be used as a medical excuse for sexual harassment? Hahaha that's probably the funniest thing to come out of this | ||
JasperGrimm
Canada100 Posts
| ||
OriginalBeast
United States709 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
Everytime I see breasts I feel a bit chipper :3 | ||
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
| ||
Keitzer
United States2509 Posts
On March 07 2011 15:46 JasperGrimm wrote: Gay men probably see more breasts than the average straight man, since women are more comfortable around them. doubt that (the more comment) however, i agree with the comfortable comment, as the homosexual male (general statement) isn't a lot more feminine than the heterosexual male (general). Men and women tend to be more comfortable with people of the same sex (or gender, i forget) where gays typically fall into the feminine category | ||
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
| ||
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
Interesting nonetheless, going to start staring at breasts more. | ||
ShamTao
United States419 Posts
edit: No evidence put forward besides a little bit of a health benefit? Exercising would be a greater benefit. | ||
deathgod6
United States5064 Posts
On March 07 2011 06:06 Chef wrote: What kind of idiot would participate in a study that told him not to look at breasts for five years? I mean hypothetically, since this is obviously not real ![]() hahaha you're right. ESPORTS and SCIENCE to the rescue! | ||
Dr. ROCKZO
New Zealand396 Posts
| ||
![]()
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
| ||
Slago
Canada726 Posts
![]() | ||
HeIios
Sweden2523 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44378 Posts
That being said, I always was a "breast" guy. I guess I was always subconsciously concerned for my health? | ||
Kinetik_Inferno
United States1431 Posts
![]() | ||
DrBoo
Canada1177 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
HULKAMANIA
United States1219 Posts
On March 07 2011 06:02 ProjectVirtue wrote: seen studies like this before. technically not baseless, as long as something is arousing. breasts just happen to be accepted as an automatic stimulant. the study can also be repeated with butts, or what have you so long as among the cohort that gets to ogle them they are all accepted to be excited by it, then its fine. It just acts in accordance to a daily increase of heart rate due to arousal. Likewise, analogous studies to this have been done with minute physical exercise and other forms of stimulants that have lead to the same conclusion. dont get all the "fail science" stuff flying around =\ Threads like this are great for determining who actually reads the threads and who just skims the OP and jumps straight on the "Post" button. Did you not see gogogadetflow's post on the first page? On March 07 2011 05:50 gogogadgetflow wrote: I'm skeptical http://www.snopes.com/humor/iftrue/breasts.asp Sorry guys. If that's not enough, here is a search for "Karen Weatherby" on the website of the New England Journal of Medicine. And here she is under Google Scholar, which contains two actual returns! Unfortunately both of them discuss the study as a well-known hoax, one of them containing this gem: There was no such a medical research study. Dr Weatherby did not exist. None of us would take such a report seriously and some of us would trash it as a dirty joke. Similarly, we do not take seriously this kind of misinformation as in seen in some advertisements on how to lose weight, how to combat hair loss, and how magical certain medical programs or policies are. So... yeah. I don't know what studies you've heard of that are similar to this. But this is not just "fail science," it's "totally fabricated for the lols" science. | ||
nayumi
Australia6499 Posts
we would still do it even if it killed us right? | ||
| ||