EPTIn this TvT, flash won not because of better micro (he did amazing with it) not because of better macro (also pretty much flawless), but he was able to make better decisions overall about when to attack, when to defend, and as importantly, where to defend and where to attack.
[OSL] ro16 2-2 - Page 56
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
In this TvT, flash won not because of better micro (he did amazing with it) not because of better macro (also pretty much flawless), but he was able to make better decisions overall about when to attack, when to defend, and as importantly, where to defend and where to attack. | ||
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
| ||
|
Tyxiquale
Australia424 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:06 NovaTheFeared wrote: Truly sick game from Flash, can't believe he pulled that one out. And with so little practice time with all the games he's been playing recently. I don't think that's a valid argument, considering hwasin is in both leagues and proleague.. AND had to practise against zerg ( for yesterday's MSL) flash only had to practise against 1 race.. but in all honesty, I I don't think lack of practise, practise against different racial opponents, and in different leagues should really be used as an excuse.. if u made it in both starleagues.. u deserve to be there.. and ur expected to be able to have the schedule for it.. hence.. STARleague.. ur not just a pro.. | ||
|
GinNtoniC
Sweden2945 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:08 ssj114 wrote: Not quite (I think). ELO is relative and tends to increase with time (I think). Just look at the chess ELOs nowadays. 10 years ago, above 2700 was considered top few in the world. Now? Well, everyone in the top 50 are just about over 2700. I see your point, but you can't just change a counting system like that  You'd have to revize the entire thing under a new name. Can't just change it to suit your preferences | ||
|
NovaTheFeared
United States7231 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:08 ssj114 wrote: Not quite (I think). ELO is relative and tends to increase with time (I think). Just look at the chess ELOs nowadays. 10 years ago, above 2700 was considered top few in the world. Now? Well, everyone in the top 50 are just about over 2700. ELO is meant to be a measure of skill, not dominance. Of course the ELO peak will rise over time. | ||
|
SimonB
United States1088 Posts
Good comeback by Flash, but he sure cut it close. | ||
disciple
9071 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:08 ssj114 wrote: Not quite (I think). ELO is relative and tends to increase with time (I think). Just look at the chess ELOs nowadays. 10 years ago, above 2700 was considered top few in the world. Now? Well, everyone in the top 50 are just about over 2700. yes, but it took more than 10 years for the inflation to kick in | ||
|
Jaksiel
United States4130 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:09 trollbone wrote: Next week wont be a win-win match If Best beat  Flash, Best and Flash advvanceIf Flash beat Best, Flash adavnce and we look at Hwasin/UpMagiC- if Hwasin win, Hwasin advance- if UpMagiC advance, Tie-Break with UpMagiC, Best, HwasinYou're wrong. They're all 1-1, therefore both matches are win-and-in. Pretty simple. | ||
|
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
| ||
|
darktreb
United States3017 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:09 trollbone wrote: Next week wont be a win-win match If Best beat Flash, Best and Flash advvanceIf Flash beat Best, Flash adavnce and we look at Hwasin/UpMagiC- if Hwasin win, Hwasin advance- if UpMagiC advance, Tie-Break with UpMagiC, Best, HwasinNo, all 4 players are currently 1-1. It's pretty clear that the two winners are going to end up 2-1 and advance. | ||
|
ssj114
Afghanistan461 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:10 GinNtoniC wrote: I see your point, but you can't just change a counting system like that You'd have to revize the entire thing under a new name. Can't just change it to suit your preferences Yeah man. Just breaks my heart to see noobs like Flash and Bisu crushing Nada's peak ELO for example. Hehe. | ||
|
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:08 darktreb wrote: I agree but you can never count out players like Best (just like you can never count out players like Flash). The real issue is just how many games will Flash have to play next week and will he have any TvP left in the tank? He hasn't played any TvP for a long time now and ironically, TvP is now his worst matchup statistically. Of course, we're still talking about the indisputable (see Katrina, Medusa) best TvP player of this generation and possibly of all time here. He played a TvP vs Kal on Medusa this week. From what I saw I don't really think that hes what you would call "Rusty" with that matchup. | ||
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
| ||
|
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
| ||
|
Jaksiel
United States4130 Posts
| ||
|
Crunchums
United States11144 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:09 trollbone wrote: Next week wont be a win-win match If Best beat Flash, Best and Flash advvanceIf Flash beat Best, Flash adavnce and we look at Hwasin/UpMagiC- if Hwasin win, Hwasin advance- if UpMagiC advance, Tie-Break with UpMagiC, Best, HwasinYou are wrong, right now every player is 1 and 1. With 2 games remaining, 2 players will be 2-1 and 2 players will be 1-2. The two players who advance will be the players who win next week. | ||
|
GinNtoniC
Sweden2945 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:11 ssj114 wrote: Yeah man. Just breaks my heart to see noobs like Flash and Bisu crushing Nada's peak ELO for example. Hehe. I know, I know, it will be ok *pats gently on the back* | ||
|
trollbone
France1905 Posts
On February 13 2009 21:10 darktreb wrote: No, all 4 players are currently 1-1. It's pretty clear that the two winners are going to end up 2-1 and advance. aah whoa thought Flash was 2-0.... | ||
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
| ||
|
Jaksiel
United States4130 Posts
| ||
| ||
