|
On March 28 2013 17:00 Birdie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 16:57 Sayle wrote:On March 28 2013 16:54 Birdie wrote:On March 28 2013 16:53 Sayle wrote:
I don't see the point of having two B- players on a team but only being allowed to use one. B- players will for the most part be the most active players in this league and thus should be available to play most weeks. If you're want to make a restriction like that, you should just limit teams to 1 B- player each (and allow a team reshuffle or else some people can't play as much as they want). No reason to think the B- players will be more active than the C+ players... Yeah and if someone proposed a limit of one C+ player per match, I would oppose that too. Your argument is that if there is only 1 B- player they'll be able to play every week, and if there are two they'll both be able to play every week. Not only will this often be false, but in addition there are plenty of active C rank players too, so the B ranks won't necessarily be more active. I like the idea of only one B- player per week because if you have two per team then you have a backup, but still get plenty of matches per B- player. Having 3 or more of them would mean they don't get so many games, and only one means you have no backup if one can't make it (although of course C level players can still play instead).
This makes no sense, i dunno if ur arguing that often B- players will be busy on saturdays or what, but sayle's point is perfectly valid. Please stop trying to restrict stuff, just let the team play who they want. And ofc the B- ranks will be more active. It's gonna go like this in activity most likely B->C+>C>C- obviously.
|
I don't get why people would leave a league just because they can't play every week. Just be on the team and play every other week or something, not like you are dedicating so much time to the league that only 1 game every other week makes it not worth your while.
Someone like me who is C rank is probably only going to get to play every other week as well, And if both B- got to play each week I might never get to play.
EDIT: Basically some people on each team aren't going to get any play time at all and a lot of people on each team are only going to get to play rarely. Leaving because you cant play every single week and have a higher rank than others is kinda a douchy perspective. Is your silver rank free time worth more than my yellow rank time?
|
It should still be up to the captain of each team to decide the rosters for each match. There were rules for creating a roster and now there will be rules of how to use the roster. I know TL is sometimes reffered to as "very strict" but in this case I think it's silly to add more and more rules... The league starts in a few days and still there are new rules coming in?
Playing BW is about having fun, sometimes what's fun is what we cannot control. Learn to let go, just this once. A.k.a: Chill out!
Note: This is coming from a participating player with the rank of B- max.
|
All the lineups are now released
|
On March 29 2013 06:32 Boundz(DarKo) wrote:
It should still be up to the captain of each team to decide the rosters for each match. There were rules for creating a roster and now there will be rules of how to use the roster. I know TL is sometimes reffered to as "very strict" but in this case I think it's silly to add more and more rules... The league starts in a few days and still there are new rules coming in?
Playing BW is about having fun, sometimes what's fun is what we cannot control. Learn to let go, just this once. A.k.a: Chill out!
Note: This is coming from a participating player with the rank of B- max.
Well that's why they make polls, to see what the majority wants.
I don't really know anyone on Team 8, but gotta cheer for them cuz I love Jaedong :D
|
|
|
On March 30 2013 10:22 NrG.Bamboo wrote:
darko hates democracy!
More like I hate the idea of democracy.
|
|
|
Are teams allowed to switch an X amount of the lineup players with *reserves* if they don't show.
I think a rule should be made about that. It should allow a team to switch 1-2 players if they don't show up and other should be WOs
|
Canada4481 Posts
5. Substitutions: Teams will be allowed up to 3 2 substitutions in the event of a no show for the regular season and 0 for the playoffs, no questions asked. The subbed out player will still receive a penalty and the subbed in player will not earn any points. After that subs are not allowed and any no shows are forfeit loses. The subbed in player can't be one of the players already playing a game that week and must be subbed in before the 20min grace period is up.
|
^changed to 2 subs for a 7 week season. Will be 4 if we go with 14 weeks which looks likely. Players should try and reschedule first and use the sub only as a last resort.
|
excited. gl hf guys later :D
|
Matches start in less than 3 hours from now. Channel is op CRTL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I made some changes to the liqudpedia score,
not every score was posted in the thread so they are incomplete.
|
On April 01 2013 04:56 Birdie wrote:sB vs CoV results ( incomplete) + Show Spoiler +
Results are now complete, I edited the quoted message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
sB.Sero <
sB.Toka <
sB.Darko <![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/w4IONQJ.png)
sas.LuMiX <
