EPTOn July 10 2011 16:02 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
^_____________________________^
^_____________________________^
LMAO, bask in your glory, u earned it!
[SPL] KT Rolster vs. STX SouL Playoffs Day 2 - Page 28
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19364 Posts
LMAO, bask in your glory, u earned it! | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States8062 Posts
Anyways, KT has never been consistent but I really hope they can do better in the 3rd match. Most people know they are an extreme dog to win the whole thing, but we can have hope KT fans. | ||
|
Herry
England681 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:02 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: ^_____________________________^ Only quoting half the statement is lame :/ | ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
HTs can storm their way up there though  | ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:02 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: ^_____________________________^ Are you saving quotes for situations like this? Lmao CSheep is having his fun | ||
|
Winechu
Singapore1186 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:04 Vasoline73 wrote: I blame Action if the game was really as bad as people say it was... Anyways, KT has never been consistent but I really hope they can do better in the 3rd match. Most people know they are an extreme dog to win the whole thing, but we can have hope KT fans. It was. In fact, probably more so than what you expected of it. Just read page 15 lol. Mindblowing fail. | ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
lurker defiler can get their way up there too Whats your point? | ||
mustaju
Estonia4505 Posts
GL on monday, KT. I wish you well, and may the better team move on to challenge the evil despots of this land. | ||
|
darktreb
United States3019 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:04 Vasoline73 wrote: I blame Action if the game was really as bad as people say it was... It was, and yes, it really falls on him. | ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:07 Iplaythings wrote: lurker defiler can get their way up there too Whats your point? Huh? HTs up the ramp > lurkers, HTs down the ramp > lurkers. My point is that there is no point in feeling "sorry" for Protoss. Unless it was directed towards Stats not playing the race that well. | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States8062 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:08 mustaju wrote: Even if we lose the series, I'm happy STX showed their strong side today. Who would have guessed we would defeat KT's main team 4-0 without using Bogus, Kal or Calm? GL on monday, KT. I wish you well, and may the better team move on to challenge the evil despots of this land. Yeah agreed. Better team needs to advance and I am rooting against CJ and SKT until the end. | ||
|
Motivate
2860 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + woongjin won though so yeah :D | ||
|
NicksonReyes
Philippines4431 Posts
If he just didn't do.....whatever that was, KT could've had the chance to send out the lefthanded bonjwa. | ||
|
Ecrilon
501 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:10 Lucumo wrote: Huh? HTs up the ramp > lurkers, HTs down the ramp > lurkers. My point is that there is no point in feeling "sorry" for Protoss. Unless it was directed towards Stats not playing the race that well. Are you actually serious or just trolling? | ||
|
mustaju
Estonia4505 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:11 Motivate wrote: dammit, horrible performance from KT. carriers are just so unstoppable in pvt these days o_o + Show Spoiler [The spoilerneeding part.] + woongjin won though so yeah :D Please spoiler this. | ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
Are you referring to the first or second part? Either way, I'm being serious. Or do you really think Zergs have better means to defend a ramp? Put 2 Archons and some HTs there, or DTs when there is no Overlord there. GG. When the Zerg is sitting there with Lurkers, Defilers, whatever, you can storm your way up there without sacrificing any units. And it's not like Stats played well. Storms weren't good, sacrificed his units unnecessarily(his 32 kill DT for example, ran him into overlord+lurker), failed to kill the drones at Zergs third base. | ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:10 Lucumo wrote: Huh? HTs up the ramp > lurkers, HTs down the ramp > lurkers. My point is that there is no point in feeling "sorry" for Protoss. Unless it was directed towards Stats not playing the race that well. I feel sorry towards stats but my arguement was that both races have something for getting up there. And I'd argue lurker / sunken / ling / defiler at ramp being way more robust than zealot / archon / ht / cannon | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States8062 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On July 10 2011 16:22 Iplaythings wrote: I feel sorry towards stats but my arguement was that both races have something for getting up there. And I'd argue lurker / sunken / ling / defiler at ramp being way more robust than zealot / archon / ht / cannon You would need a pylon/creep there though. But regarding static defense, sunkens are certainly better than cannons considering that swarm pretty much negates them. Sunkens would prove useful when you finally march up the ramp. On July 10 2011 16:32 Vasoline73 wrote: How can anyone say protoss can defend better than zerg O_O. Defilers + lurks + sunks + cracklings? Hyvaa obviously very talented v P and Stats lost fair and square but uhhhhhhh... Cracklings don't matter, lol. Archons > Cracklings. Also, on the other side of the ramp isn't unlimited space and when the density of units is too high, then storms would be even more devastating. And the one who is defending has less units there by the way. Otherwise a defense would be useless, right? (Not that it matters, more Zerg units means more Zerg units that die to storms.) And despite Protoss having better options to defend, I think it's fine for both races. So no need to feel sorry for either race which was the initial point of the discussion. | ||
| ||
