EPT
)1974-1 are B- or better out of 19000ish players included in our stats (D+ or better players).
So B- is the top 10%.
1100-1 are B or better so about top 6%.
432-1 are B+ or better so about top 2%.
ICCup rank median - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
KwarK
United States43934 Posts
)1974-1 are B- or better out of 19000ish players included in our stats (D+ or better players). So B- is the top 10%. 1100-1 are B or better so about top 6%. 432-1 are B+ or better so about top 2%. | ||
|
hide.X
Australia105 Posts
| ||
|
ActualSteve
United States627 Posts
Too much crap surrounding the important numbers. ... and that B+ thing makes me wonder. | ||
|
xhuwin
United States476 Posts
| ||
|
hide.X
Australia105 Posts
On August 03 2009 11:23 ActualSteve wrote: This post was a good effort, but it must be revised. Too much crap surrounding the important numbers. ... and that B+ thing makes me wonder. fixed. No more crap surrounding numbers anymore =p | ||
|
Commodore
United States97 Posts
On August 03 2009 10:35 stroggos wrote: A+ .05% A .14% A- .36% B+ .48% B .68% B- 1.4% C+ 1.9% C 3.3% C- 7.7% D+ 14.8% D 62% D- 7.1% ![[image loading]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/3xcommodore/iccuprankspie.gif) | ||
|
KwarK
United States43934 Posts
That's not taking into account inactive or unused accounts though. | ||
|
hide.X
Australia105 Posts
On August 03 2009 11:06 Liquid`NonY wrote: it depends on where you want to make the cutoff, but simply divide your rank by the total number of players? that would tell you the percentage your rank occupies in relation to other ranks. This is different: A good demonstration is this: 48.141% of people above D are D+. It doesn't make sense to say that a D+ player is in the top 48.141 percentile of players above D (a D+ player is obviously in the top/bottom 100 percentile of players above D) | ||
|
hide.X
Australia105 Posts
edit: actually nevermind. the one you did is more useful | ||
|
stroggos
New Zealand1543 Posts
On August 03 2009 11:44 Kwark wrote: That's not taking into account inactive or unused accounts though. yeah it is. If it wasn't then D would be about 96.5% of the accounts. there are 550,000 registered iccup users and 63000ish registered this season. about 42,000 D rank this season or something | ||
|
skronch
United States2717 Posts
Across all ranks (using Stroggos's data set) ![[image loading]](http://i26.tinypic.com/1sy0lk.png) D+ and higher (using OP's data set) ![[image loading]](http://i29.tinypic.com/300cwtv.png) basically it's exactly what we expected? | ||
|
KwarK
United States43934 Posts
On August 03 2009 11:51 stroggos wrote: yeah it is. If it wasn't then D would be about 96.5% of the accounts. there are 550,000 registered iccup users and 63000ish registered this season. about 42,000 D rank this season or something jeez, that's pretty sick. | ||
|
stroggos
New Zealand1543 Posts
On August 03 2009 11:16 Kwark wrote: Unless I'm being incompetent I think it's pretty easy to estimate them (provided the stats are provided by a useful op )1974-1 are B- or better out of 19000ish players included in our stats (D+ or better players). So B- is the top 10%. 1100-1 are B or better so about top 6%. 432-1 are B+ or better so about top 2%. assuming that every single D ranked player should be D+ or higher then yes...B- and higher is about 10%. However, using my example posted earlier 50% of D ranked people should be D+ or higher assuming they play a reasonable amount of games. 3.35% are B- and higher if we include D but if only 50% of D rank players are meant to be D+ and higher then B- and higher should be 6.675% roughly | ||
|
stroggos
New Zealand1543 Posts
yeah, but there are about 200 pages of people sitting on 950 or 1050 or 1130 im guessing. | ||
|
stroggos
New Zealand1543 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27172 Posts
| ||
|
rredtooth
5464 Posts
| ||
|
wok
United States504 Posts
| ||
|
Ret.
Brazil33 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong but, wouldn't it be better if you divided the sum of points of every single player with 1+ game and then divided for the total number of players? Following my idea you should be capable of balancing the real ability of players... since a 2500D+ is for sure a better player than a 2000D+... The way you did it, dividing the number of players in half, just considers a A+ equivalent to a D-. Imagine it like a metal bar that you wish to balance in way it wont fall, if one side is heavier than the other, you just can't balance it on the middle. Sry for bad english, hope I helped xD | ||
|
ActualSteve
United States627 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:47 wok wrote: Yes, I'm in the top 99 percentiles. Koreans laugh at such sentiments. | ||
| ||
